Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/index.php)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   FL Retired cop, shoots texting wanker (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=791641)

krichard 01-14-2014 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baz (Post 7857159)
I heard it was texting....then yelling at, throwing stuff at, and basically confronting the shooter. You're saying he was talking also? Not good....

Maybe he should have just apologized.

I mean he could have just said "My bad" - just like you just did.

And once more for the record...I am not justifying nor condoning the shooting.

I'm not saying he was or was not talking. I'm saying that when I go the movies, before the actual movie starts it's ok to talk, txt or whatever. Even after the movie starts, if someone is annoying you let the management deal with the problem. Especially if you're packing....

Rick Lee 01-14-2014 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t-tom (Post 7857169)
Did he just tried to stab you and just missed or did he punch you? Do you defend yourself? Run and hide? You have a split second to decide in the dark. Are you being attacked? How far is this guy going to go? Does he have a gun? A knife? I was not there I do not know what happened. But I understand how it could get the point of someone getting shot.

Anyone who's truly competent to carry a gun wouldn't even clear leather in a dark movie theatre because something might have brushed his face. If you can't see your target or what's behind it, you don't even think about shooting, let alone with such weak justification (or complete lack thereof). I can see his defense lawyer saying exactly what you wrote, but I don't see a jury buying it. Whatever happens to Reeves, he's facing ruinous legal costs and then a phat lawsuit from the texter's wife. If he doesn't die in prison, he'll die in section 8 housing.

t-tom 01-14-2014 07:01 PM

So it's dark you don't defend yourself? Again I was not there and neither was anyone on here. All we have to go by are what's being reported by the media and we all know they only report the truth. All I'm saying is I can see how it got to that point. It should never have gotten that far.

sc_rufctr 01-14-2014 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fintstone (Post 7857134)
Reportedly his wife was shot/hit because she was trying to restrain him and had her arm around him. If he were not attacking the older man or at least threatening him...why would she need to do so?

That there is a very important detail.

techweenie 01-14-2014 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick Lee (Post 7857193)
Anyone who's truly competent to carry a gun wouldn't even clear leather in a dark movie theatre because something might have brushed his face. If you can't see your target or what's behind it, you don't even think about shooting, let alone with such weak justification (or complete lack thereof). I can see his defense lawyer saying exactly what you wrote, but I don't see a jury buying it. Whatever happens to Reeves, he's facing ruinous legal costs and then a phat lawsuit from the texter's wife. If he doesn't die in prison, he'll die in section 8 housing.


^^^ this.

And having been to plenty of movies, I'd have to say that yelling at a guy to stop texting is more disruptive than the texting itself. And don't forget, the movie had not started yet!

AFC-911 01-14-2014 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by techweenie (Post 7857238)
^^^ this.

And having been to plenty of movies, I'd have to say that yelling at a guy to stop texting is more disruptive than the texting itself. And don't forget, the movie had not started yet!

He asked the guy to put his phone away. I'm pretty sure the yelling didn't start right away.

sc_rufctr 01-14-2014 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AFC-911 (Post 7857252)
He asked the guy to put his phone away. I'm pretty sure the yelling didn't start right away.

It has to be asked. Why did the older guy ask him to put his phone away during the "shorts"?

If the movie had started then he would be justified in asking him to put his phone away but during the "shorts"????

t-tom 01-14-2014 07:27 PM

I'm guessing there is more to this story.

Heel n Toe 01-14-2014 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sc_rufctr (Post 7857255)
It has to be asked. Why did the older guy ask him to put his phone away during the "shorts"?

If the movie had started then he would be justified in asking him to put his phone away but during the "shorts"????

My thoughts in post #28:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Heel n Toe (Post 7855539)
To your greater point, the "old man" was smart enough to know that texting during the previews probably meant that it would continue during the movie.

And he was also smart enough to know that he would miss part of the movie if he had to get up and go look for a manager after the movie started... well, hopefully you've thought about that by now.

Of course, it could always be true that "the texter" wouldn't have continued after the movie began, but it could go either way.

And after the movie begins, why should someone have to miss part of the movie to go find a manager? That's another win for the texter... he would probably be chuckling to himself for making the guy miss part of the movie.

Very soon, there will probably be signs on the doors to the rooms housing the individual screens saying:
TURN YOUR CELLPHONE OFF NOW --
BEFORE YOU GO IN --
IF A PATRON HAS TO COME GET A MANAGER
BECAUSE YOUR PHONE IS NOT OFF,
YOU WILL BE ESCORTED OUT OF THE THEATER
AND NO REFUND OR PASS WILL BE ISSUED.


Clear enough?

No, I do not condone the shooting with the info we have now. I'm merely stating that people need to be aware that cellphones and theaters don't mix.

Get up and walk to the hallway if you have to make a call.

HHI944 01-14-2014 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heel n Toe (Post 7857273)
My thoughts in post #28:


Of course, it could always be true that "the texter" wouldn't have continued after the movie began, but it could go either way.

And after the movie begins, why should someone have to miss part of the movie to go find a manager? That's another win for the texter... he would probably be chuckling to himself for making the guy miss part of the movie.

Very soon, there will probably be signs on the doors to the rooms housing the individual screens saying:
TURN YOUR CELLPHONE OFF NOW --
BEFORE YOU GO IN --
IF A PATRON HAS TO COME GET A MANAGER
BECAUSE YOUR PHONE IS NOT OFF,
YOU WILL BE ESCORTED OUT OF THE THEATER
AND NO REFUND OR PASS WILL BE ISSUED.


Clear enough?

No, I do not condone the shooting with the info we have now. I'm merely stating that people need to be aware that cellphones and theaters don't mix.

Get up and walk to the hallway if you have to make a call.

They already have those signs down here.

sc_rufctr 01-14-2014 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heel n Toe (Post 7857273)
My thoughts in post #28:


Of course, it could always be true that "the texter" wouldn't have continued after the movie began, but it could go either way.

And after the movie begins, why should someone have to miss part of the movie to go find a manager? That's another win for the texter... he would probably be chuckling to himself for making the guy miss part of the movie... snip

I get your point but the older guy should have cut him some slack...

To me this whole incident screams "control issues". The retired cop clearly has those issues IMO.

I've seen it before in many people and not just retired, serving cops. It's like YOU WILL DO IT MY WAY...
That attitude just gets my back up. It's like "I can step on you and there's nothing you can do about it".

I personally will not put up with it. I just walk away without saying a word.

Heel n Toe 01-14-2014 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sc_rufctr (Post 7857333)
I get your point but the older guy should have cut him some slack...

To me this whole incident screams "control issues". The retired cop clearly has those issues IMO.

I've seen it before in many people and not just retired, serving cops. It's like YOU WILL DO IT MY WAY...
That attitude just gets my back up. It's like "I can step on you and there's nothing you can do about it".

I personally will not put up with it. I just walk away without saying a word.

So you completely missed the part where "texting guy's" control issues dictated that he not allow anyone to tell him what to do?

Yeah, that'll work.

Both parties contributed to what happened. Texting guy began it all.

One more sign for the door to the theater:

NEVER BRING A
BOX OF POPCORN
TO A GUNFIGHT.

krichard 01-14-2014 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heel n Toe (Post 7857343)
So you completely missed the part where "texting guy's" control issues dictated that he not allow anyone to tell him what to do?

Yeah, that'll work.

Both parties contributed to what happened. Texting guy began it all.

One more sign for the door to the theater:

NEVER BRING A
BOX OF POPCORN
TO A GUNFIGHT.

So if the guy texting had continued to text through the previews and continued though the movie and the old guy never said anything the texting guy would still be dead?

aigel 01-14-2014 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnsjmc (Post 7856914)
No I agree we don,t know everything I said I am suspicious when someone "retires" at 51 .

That's not an uncommon "retirement" age for cops and firefighters in CA. See post #14. It may be different in FL:

Mandatory Retirement


G

Heel n Toe 01-14-2014 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krichard (Post 7857347)
So if the guy texting had continued to text through the previews and continued though the movie and the old guy never said anything the texting guy would still be dead?

I don't know how you could possibly get that from what I said, but by all means please try to explain how you did.

krichard 01-14-2014 09:00 PM

Sorry if I misinterpreted. I thought you were implying that the texter should have just obeyed the old guy and stopped what he was doing without question.



Quote:

<div class="pre-quote">
Quote de <strong>krichard</strong>
</div>

<div class="post-quote">
<div style="font-style:italic">So if the guy texting had continued to text through the previews and continued though the movie and the old guy never said anything the texting guy would still be dead?</div>
</div>I don't know how you could possibly get <u>that</u> from what I said, but by all means please try to explain how you did.

Baz 01-14-2014 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krichard (Post 7857347)
So if the guy texting had continued to text through the previews and continued though the movie and the old guy never said anything the texting guy would still be dead?

More like if he had stopped texting........he would still be alive.

krichard 01-14-2014 09:11 PM

Great society we live in... Just kill people that get on our nerves...
Quote:

<div class="pre-quote">
Quote de <strong>krichard</strong>
</div>

<div class="post-quote">
<div style="font-style:italic">So if the guy texting had continued to text through the previews and continued though the movie and the old guy never said anything the texting guy would still be dead?</div>
</div>More like if he had <b>stopped texting</b>........he would still be alive.

Baz 01-14-2014 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krichard (Post 7857370)
Great society we live in... Just kill people that get on our nerves...

Remember....only humans do it. Not animals.

Been going on since the stone age.

Mankind.......:rolleyes:

speeder 01-14-2014 10:47 PM

Most Murder2 cases start as trivial disputes, or at least a lot of them seem to. Usually they involve thuggish or violent types, someone gets "disrespected" and next thing you know, someone is bleeding to death on the ground.

Alcohol is also a common factor. It seems like a lot of M2 cases occur in the parking lot of a bar, scuffle/fight and then someone takes it to the next level with a gun or a knife.

This doesn't seem much different to me. Being a *glass-half-full* kind of guy, the only upside to this tragedy is that maybe some people will be thinking twice about texting or answering a phone in a movie theater. :)

19-911-65 01-15-2014 12:26 AM

Cliff notes after reading CNN report 10:07 PM EST, Tue January 14, 2014:

Bond denied for ex-cop Curtis Reeves who allegedly shot texting dad - CNN.com

1- Curtis Reeves got into an argument with another moviegoer over texting. The two men exchanged words that gradually became more heated

2- Chad Oulson was using his cell phone and Reeves told him to put it away

3- The two men began to argue; Reeves, had gone to seek a manager's help to stop the texting

4- manager was busy with another customer and Reeves never addressed his complaint with a supervisor.

5- "He came back very irritated," Cummings recalled.

6- Voices were raised. Oulson threw a bag of popcorn at Reeves, police said. Then, the former police officer took out a .380 semi-automatic handgun and shot Oulson.

7- Witnesses told police they saw no punches being thrown during the incident;

8- Per Cobb Theatres website: prohibited items-no cell phone use, including texting, in the theater auditorium. And no weapons allowed.

* Atty: Shooter had previous text incident; An attorney says Curtis Reeves had a previous incident with a woman in a movie theater involving text messaging.

<iframe width='416' height='234' src='http://www.cnn.com/video/api/embed.html#/video/us/2014/01/14/fl-movie-theater-shooting-suspect-text-altercation.wfts' frameborder='0'></iframe>

Jim Richards 01-15-2014 01:58 AM

If the shooter got up out of his seat and left to talk to the manager, why couldn't he just move to a different seat away from the texter? That had to be less effort. IMO, he was trying to play cop and enforce the theater's policy against texting. Killing a person over texting? Over popcorn tossed at him? Is this the friggen wild, wild west? WTF?

The victim deserved to be tossed out on his ear by the theater management, and even have the cops called to see if he should be charged for his behavior in the incident. Just not killed.

sc_rufctr 01-15-2014 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 19-911-65 (Post 7857426)
Cliff notes...

* Atty: Shooter had previous text incident; An attorney says Curtis Reeves had a previous incident with a woman in a movie theater involving text messaging.

<iframe width='416' height='234' src='http://www.cnn.com/video/api/embed.html#/video/us/2014/01/14/fl-movie-theater-shooting-suspect-text-altercation.wfts' frameborder='0'></iframe>

What's with this? :eek:

The video is worth watching.

group911@aol.co 01-15-2014 04:57 AM

Probably the most telling sign is how far the local Sheriff is throwing one of his own under the bus.
Officers rarely if ever turn on one of their own.

slakjaw 01-15-2014 05:38 AM

He did stop. The angry old piece of human trash still shot him. If you think the texting dude was in the wrong please stay at the silent movies the talkies aren't for you

Quote:

<div class="pre-quote">
Quote de <strong>krichard</strong>
</div>

<div class="post-quote">
<div style="font-style:italic">So if the guy texting had continued to text through the previews and continued though the movie and the old guy never said anything the texting guy would still be dead?</div>
</div>More like if he had <b>stopped texting</b>........he would still be alive.

AFC-911 01-15-2014 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slakjaw (Post 7857635)
He did stop. The angry old piece of human trash still shot him. If you think the texting dude was in the wrong please stay at the silent movies the talkies aren't for you

Sure, he stopped...But then he started arguing, throwing stuff and was probably hot headed enough to get in the old man's face.

If he would have just let it go after the old guy returned, he might still be alive.

VaSteve 01-15-2014 05:49 AM

What movie was it?


Every movie I have been to lately was so loud you couldn't hear a little text beeping.

AFC-911 01-15-2014 05:50 AM

^ Lone Survivor.

A type of action movies that hot headed guys would be flocking to.

widgeon13 01-15-2014 05:52 AM

I suppose he could have just seen "Gran Torino" at home as well.

fintstone 01-15-2014 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 19-911-65 (Post 7857426)
...* Atty: Shooter had previous text incident; An attorney says Curtis Reeves had a previous incident with a woman in a movie theater involving text messaging...

OMG! The old dude glared at a woman who was texting during a movie! What is his problem? None of us would ever do that. Lock him up!

widgeon13 01-15-2014 06:07 AM

Sounds like they both have some issues.

scottmandue 01-15-2014 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by speeder (Post 7857406)
This doesn't seem much different to me. Being a *glass-half-full* kind of guy, the only upside to this tragedy is that maybe some people will be thinking twice about texting or answering a phone in a movie theater. :)

Or perhaps people will think twice about getting up in someones face over something so trivial.

I used to be a fairly aggressive and agro driver, thought nothing of flipping someone off if I was offended by their driving style (tailgating, cut in front of me with inches to spare).

However, as I have matured I have come to realize that:
A) You never know where the other guy/gal is coming from, i.e. they just got fired, had a big hairy argument with the S.O., just found out someone they love is dieing of cancer or is jacked up on drugs.
B) You never know who is packing.

fintstone 01-15-2014 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Richards (Post 7857452)
If the shooter got up out of his seat and left to talk to the manager, why couldn't he just move to a different seat away from the texter? That had to be less effort. IMO, he was trying to play cop and enforce the theater's policy against texting. Killing a person over texting? Over popcorn tossed at him? Is this the friggen wild, wild west? WTF?

The victim deserved to be tossed out on his ear by the theater management, and even have the cops called to see if he should be charged for his behavior in the incident. Just not killed.

I spend my life accommodating asshats who are disrespectful, don't follow the rules, push and shove their way to the front of the line, cut me off in traffic, steal from me, etc...they think they can do whatever they please. While I don't think anyone should be shot for bad behavior, that is certainly the root cause here. When I was younger, people did not act like this (probably because they would have been punched in the nose. Now, no one wants to get involved and bad behavior rules. Clearly the theater does not enforce its posted policies and many posting here seem to think that calling/texting in a theater is acceptable...as is threatening old men who ask that a little common courtesy be extended.

Again, I hate to see a man shot and killed, but recognize that being an asshat increases ones risks...much as street racing does for a driver. I have more sympathy for the old guy who felt he was being assaulted and the dead guy's family than for the dead guy. He may not have deserved this, but he was certainly asking for it. You can guarantee that if a young 250lb body builder (not an old man) had asked him to stop texting and then went to management...this guy would not have jumped up and got into the older guy's face when he came back into the theater (and the guy's wife would not have been put in the position of having to restrain him from coming after the old dude). Like all "tough guys"... you eventually run into someone that just refuses to take your crap.

slakjaw 01-15-2014 06:41 AM

Old piece of human trash is going to spend the rest of his life locked in a cell getting butt raped. Ex Cop in the slammer is gonna go over really good :) it is true, eventually you do run into someone that refuses to take your crap. This is why society is going to end up locking this old fart up. We are no longer willing to take crap from old farts with big tempers big guns and small dicks.

AFC-911 01-15-2014 06:46 AM

^ Why are you overlooking the fact that if Mr. Texty Text would have just kept his mouth shut, he wouldn't have a hole in his chest?

Are you the type of person that would throw a tantrum if someone asked you to put away your phone? What kind of 43 year old man acts like a little baby?

Jim Richards 01-15-2014 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fintstone (Post 7857691)
I spend my life accommodating asshats who are disrespectful, don't follow the rules, push and shove their way to the front of the line, cut me off in traffic, steal from me, etc...they think they can do whatever they please. While I don't think anyone should be shot for bad behavior, that is certainly the root cause here. When I was younger, people did not act like this (probably because they would have been punched in the nose. Now, no one wants to get involved and bad behavior rules. Clearly the theater does not enforce its posted policies and many posting here seem to think that calling/texting in a theater is acceptable...as is threatening old men who ask that a little common courtesy be extended.

Again, I hate to see a man shot and killed, but recognize that being an asshat increases ones risks...much as street racing does for a driver. I have more sympathy for the old guy who felt he was being assaulted and the dead guy's family than for the dead guy. He may not have deserved this, but he was certainly asking for it. You can guarantee that if a young 250lb body builder (not an old man) had asked him to stop texting and then went to management...this guy would not have jumped up and got into the older guy's face when he came back into the theater (and the guy's wife would not have been put in the position of having to restrain him from coming after the old dude). Like all "tough guys"... you eventually run into someone that just refuses to take your crap.

We certainly could benefit from a lot more civility and courtesy in our populace. I don't know how we can cut down on these bad behaviors, but I personally try to be a reasonably good example. I also leave my guns at home.

johnsjmc 01-15-2014 06:51 AM

The shooter should have changed seats . BUT ego was involved for both men.
Certainly an experienced police officer should know how to defuse a heated situation BUT I think both were probably hot heads and neither was backing down . One was armed (also against the rules in the theartre) Certainly two wrongs don,t make a right but the shooter was just as guilty of breaking rules in the theatre just he felt entitled to correct everybody else,s behavior before examining his own.
I was on a plane returning from Mexico a few years ago I quietly tilted my seat back as I was allowed to do after the seat belt sign went off. The jerk behind me pushed it back up and started arguing with me because he was over 6 ft and needed the room .
I argued back and it was getting a little loud. I or my wife called the stewardess who arrived and told the guy I had every right to tilt my seat. .In this example all seats were full and all were the same size, so neither of us could move. The theatre had plenty of seats with only about 25 people there.
A 3 yr old little girl is an orphan because a guy brought a gun into a theatre .
If he wasn,t armed I,m sure both would have survived. Even if someone was punched.
Makes me think now I could have been shot if the same thing happened on a bus or some other transportation where no weapon screening is done before boarding.

Jim Richards 01-15-2014 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AFC-911 (Post 7857734)
What kind of 43 year old man acts like a little baby?

A dead one.

scottmandue 01-15-2014 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baz (Post 7857379)
Remember....only humans do it. Not animals.

Been going on since the stone age.

Mankind.......:rolleyes:

Um, I saw in a documentary groups of primates (chimpanzee, gorillas) go to 'war' and kill each other for no apparent reason. Also packs of wolfs have been know to take down animals and walk away without eating them... so it is not just a human thing.

slakjaw 01-15-2014 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AFC-911 (Post 7857734)
^ Why are you overlooking the fact that if Mr. Texty Text would have just kept his mouth shut, he wouldn't have a hole in his chest?

Are you the type of person that would throw a tantrum if someone asked you to put away your phone? What kind of 43 year old man acts like a little baby?

Free speech. I can say whatever I want. You may not shoot me for it. I am over looking nothing.

Why is a minor annoyance a justification for murder in your mind. Please seek help you are not normal.

I personally would have said nothing to the old guy. I would have ignored him just like I ignore other human trash everyday. I would not have even acknowledged he existed. You should send him some lube man, maybe someone will do the same for you after you snap and kill someone. :)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.