|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Yes, a company who is paid by NASA to build/invent something, is certainly not a NASA achievement.
Haters gonna hate, Sammy. We all know your position.
__________________
Guy '87 944 (first porsche/project car) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 54,889
|
You equate the CT scanner and the MRI machine?
Okay, how about this list: NASA Technologies Benefit Our Lives |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 8,743
|
Is that really all we got out of this?
Really?
__________________
Mike Bradshaw 1980 911SC sunroof coupe, silver/black Putting the sick back into sycophant! |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 8,743
|
Let's see.
A few crappy pictures. Verification of 4 moons of Pluto that weren't even known about when the project started, 2 of which weren't know about when the craft launched! Study of the solar wind at that distance. Study of ultra long range radar communication. Oh, it cost you $0.18 per year Sammy. You lose more than that between the couch cushions, do you call for the disbanding of couches?
__________________
Mike Bradshaw 1980 911SC sunroof coupe, silver/black Putting the sick back into sycophant! |
||
|
|
|