Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/index.php)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   what is stock 3.2 0-60 time? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=193666)

TRE Cup 11-23-2004 12:33 PM

what is stock 3.2 0-60 time?
 
what do the magazines and porsche say that the 84-89 carrera do 0-60 mph?
thanks

MikeSid 11-23-2004 12:45 PM

I've seen 5.6 and 5.3 reported.

84porsche 11-23-2004 12:59 PM

Dave,

Take a look at this thread. It has the Car and Driver magazine test with 5.3.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=75241&highlight=carrera +magazine

Rot 911 11-23-2004 01:03 PM

You would have to do some serious abuse of a Carrera to get 5.3 out of it.

nhromyak 11-23-2004 01:07 PM

IIRC - my owners manual shows a graph with either 6.0 or 6.1 seconds.

Adam 11-23-2004 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kurt V:
You would have to do some serious abuse of a Carrera to get 5.3 out of it.

Kurt B knows all about this. I really miss his 3.2 Cab smack-down stories. :cool:

Rot 911 11-23-2004 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Adam Chaplin
Kurt B knows all about this. I really miss his 3.2 Cab smack-down stories. :cool:
I've read them, so me too!

84porsche 11-23-2004 01:14 PM

I wonder if they were capable of this brand new in 84. My engine has 180k plus more so I doubt the car would keep to specs after that much wear and tear.

RickM 11-23-2004 01:18 PM

I recall 5.8 ...

RickM 11-23-2004 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 84porsche
I wonder if they were capable of this brand new in 84. My engine has 180k plus more so I doubt the car would keep to specs after that much wear and tear.
At 180k miles I'd think you're right. Another factor would be how the car was broken in.

Eric Coffey 11-23-2004 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nhromyak
IIRC - my owners manual shows a graph with either 6.0 or 6.1 seconds.
Yup. Factory manual says 0-60 in 6.1 seconds. Seems a bit conservative though.

Jim Garfield 11-23-2004 01:28 PM

Car and Driver used to be notorious for brutalizing their test cars, frequently breaking/ blowing them up in the process. I don't doubt that they did 5.3, but the car was probably trashed when they were through with it.:eek:

MOMO3.2 11-23-2004 01:47 PM

Good point about Car and Driver having to really launch the 1984 Carrera 3.2 they tested to get a 5.3 second 0-60. Car and Driver thrashes on EVERY car they test to establish a 0-60 time. Therefore, that time IS valid "RELATIVE" to other cars C/D tests.

DAMN, 0-60 in 5.3 seconds back in 1984!!! The Carrera 3.2 really was ONE BAD MF when it came out!

Mike

targa911man 11-23-2004 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MOMO3.2
DAMN, 0-60 in 5.3 seconds back in 1984!!! The Carrera 3.2 really was ONE BAD MF when it came out!

Mike


Still is, IMO.

MOMO3.2 11-23-2004 02:01 PM

Dan:

I am pretty fond of my 1987 Carrera too.

Mike

dd74 11-23-2004 02:21 PM

Eh - I've read so many reviews of the 3.2. I've seen 0-60 between 5.1 all the way to 6.7. It's just a matter of how much you want to destroy your car, I guess. I'd keep my car living and just say "...under 10 seconds."

Carrera3.5L 11-23-2004 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jim Garfield
Car and Driver used to be notorious for brutalizing their test cars, frequently breaking/ blowing them up in the process. I don't doubt that they did 5.3, but the car was probably trashed when they were through with it.:eek:
It's pretty much every magazine. I have worked with them all. I had my personal '95 Jetta VR6 thrashed for a Motor Trend feature back in '98 at Camarillo Airport. The bigger the publication, the less they care.

They must have done at least 15 0-60 runs with the car, trying to improve on the 6.4 seconds they got with it. I had to put in a new clutch, rotors, brake pads and tires after the test day was over. Fortunately, the tires were free.

Worst part was having to limp it home from Ventura County all the way back to South O.C.:(

Wonder what an '88 Carrera with a 3.5L twin-plug motor will do 0-60 in???

Ralph

masraum 11-23-2004 02:40 PM

Depending upon the magazine, I've seen everything between 5.2 and 6.1, but the most common numbers seem to run between 5.6 and 5.8, so I would consider them mid to high 5 cars.

KFC911 11-23-2004 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MikeSid
I've seen 5.6 and 5.3 reported.
Man...I can't even get mine off of the jack stands that fast :)

bandhawk 11-23-2004 03:07 PM

I know mine will hit mid sixties in 2nd before redlining. Here...on page 111 of my owner's manual is a transmission diagram; it says the RPMs at 60 MPH in 2nd gear are around 5700.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.