 
					|   | 
 | 
 | 
| 
 | 
| Registered | 
				
				Torsion Bar Installation Question
			 
			Snagged a new set of torsion bars....22's and 28's for my 89.  I'll be having them installed but I'm just curious....  I see that they are labeled L and R. Which side is L? Depending on your orientation it could be either one. Also, which end of the bar faces out (closest to the perimiter of the car), the end with the label (stamp), or the blank one? Thanks, 
				__________________ Mike 89 Carrera 3.6 V-ram #94 Livin' for Targa time! Want to make God laugh? Tell him your plans! | ||
|  08-14-2002, 03:05 PM | 
 | 
| Irrationally exuberant | 
			The number of splines are different for the inner end and outer end - so no worries about putting them in backwards. As far as left and right, I can't see why there would be a difference - there isn't on Glen Sander's bars IFIK. -Chris | ||
|  08-14-2002, 03:23 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea. 
					Posts: 37,840
				 | 
			I'm really sorry to disagree. The number of splines are the same and the one marked left goes on the driver's side as it is pre-stressed for the usual single driver. I don't believe it make any difference as to the direction of the bar. See top paragraph on p. 162 "101 Projects For Your 911." IMHO left and right are always determined while sitting in the car (facing forward for you contorsionists). Last edited by Zeke; 08-14-2002 at 03:52 PM.. | ||
|  08-14-2002, 03:45 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Santa Clara, CA 
					Posts: 5,668
				 | 
			Left is the drivers side. However, the ends of the tbars do not have the same number of splines. It is the difference in spline count that allows very fine adjustment of the rear ride height (on early cars without adjustable spring plates). You can dial in a rotation of the tbar that is much smaller than a full spline! It is therefor impossible to install them backwards (inside out). I don' t know about the pre-stressed thing. I suspect that they test the spring rate at the manufacturer to be sure it is in spec. The spring rate may not be the same in both directions, therefore they are marked left and right to be sure you install them in the same direction they got tested. So do be sure and keep the correct L/R orientation. 
				__________________ Chuck Moreland - elephantracing.com - vonnen.com | ||
|  08-14-2002, 04:01 PM | 
 | 
| Registered | 
			L=drivers side. R=passengers side.  Chris is right the number of splines on the inside is different than the number of splines on the outside. If there were the same number of splines on both sides then it would be imposible to adjust the ride hieght. edit: Chuck types faster than I so 
				__________________ '94 CMC Firebird Trans Am '86 951 LS1 (C-2) Gone   '77 911 3.2 (C-1) Gone but not forgotten. http://www.pelicanparts.com/MotorCity/marcesq1 http://www.youtube.com/user/958Fan#p/u | ||
|  08-14-2002, 04:05 PM | 
 | 
| Registered | 
			The fronts have the same # of splines on both ends but must still be installed according to L and R. I hear the torsion bar can snap if the L is installed on the R side, and visa versa. 
				__________________ .. | ||
|  08-14-2002, 04:25 PM | 
 | 
|   | 
| Registered | 
			Thanks for clearing that up Paul. I should have mentioned that, but was responding to the rears only based upon the ride hieght adjustment. Cheers 
				__________________ '94 CMC Firebird Trans Am '86 951 LS1 (C-2) Gone   '77 911 3.2 (C-1) Gone but not forgotten. http://www.pelicanparts.com/MotorCity/marcesq1 http://www.youtube.com/user/958Fan#p/u | ||
|  08-14-2002, 04:33 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: So. Calif. 
					Posts: 19,910
				 | 
			Chris, I agree with your assesement of the rear bars. However, L and R might refer to the front torsion bars which (if memory serves me), have the same splines on either end. Used bars take a "set" in their installed postion and should thereafter be used in the same L or R location. Sherwood Lee http://members.rennlist.org/911pcars | ||
|  08-14-2002, 04:47 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: St. Louis, USA 
					Posts: 129
				 | 
			I just put mine in last night.  The Left is the drivers side and I put the stampings to the front or as you reference towards the perimeter of the car.  They seem to fit fine and I was able to set the height to 25.5 inches from the fender well to the ground fairly easily with only a couple of attempts.  I will takle the rears this weekend as the new neatrix are going on.  Then off to the alignment shop. Good Luck... 
				__________________ 78 3.2L CIS 911SC | ||
|  08-14-2002, 04:51 PM | 
 | 
| Registered | 
			Thanks guys.  I just looked at the bars and confirmed that the rears have a larger diameter at one end than the other.  Fronts are the same so I'll follow the L&R-only routine for those. Best, 
				__________________ Mike 89 Carrera 3.6 V-ram #94 Livin' for Targa time! Want to make God laugh? Tell him your plans! | ||
|  08-14-2002, 04:57 PM | 
 | 
| Registered | 
			David: The fun is just about to begin for you. (Bin there done that) Mike: Follow the R & L orientation on the rear as well   
				__________________ '94 CMC Firebird Trans Am '86 951 LS1 (C-2) Gone   '77 911 3.2 (C-1) Gone but not forgotten. http://www.pelicanparts.com/MotorCity/marcesq1 http://www.youtube.com/user/958Fan#p/u | ||
|  08-14-2002, 05:04 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea. 
					Posts: 37,840
				 | Quote: 
 And I don't know where I read up about the pre-stressing, but if I can find it again, I'll post it. I'm always willing to back up any statement or have a big slice of humble pie. UMMMMM..........GOOD. | ||
|  08-14-2002, 06:18 PM | 
 | 
|   | 
| Registered Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: McLean, VA 
					Posts: 1,155
				 | 
				
				Stress? What STRESS??
			 
			Mike, You are going to LUUUUVE it. Just finished upgrading to 31/21 with street hardness polys all round, corner balanced and aligned for dual purpose street/track. First drive tonight, and its beuutiful - radically improved turn in and responsiveness. The biggest surprise is that there is none of the harshness I was expecting - the ride is smoother on this setup, which is certainly due to the fact that every single stock bushing was totally shot [at 150K miles, thats no surprise]. FWIW, I learned a lot about bump steer geometry in the process. Bolting on a kit spacer is a [very] rough approximation. It well worth spending the time to carefully measure the tie rod angles, and make a spacer that gets the tie rods to perfectly level - makes a huge difference. The next step is the very spendy ERP drop link kits, which Jack O has on his car. Perfection, at a price. Should manage to get the new sways on next week [big Smart Racing rear, Weltmeister front]. Now, I think you will find that some after market torsion bar manufacturers DO pre-stress for L and R - if so, the bars will have an identifying mark for the correct side. Chris B is right - the Sanden gun drilled bars are not factory stressed. 
				__________________ Tony K '89 944T 944 SuperCup Champ 2004 & 2005 '85 Carrera - Sold [sob] TrackVision 944Cup The 999 Site | ||
|  08-14-2002, 06:35 PM | 
 | 
| Irrationally exuberant | 
				
				Re: Stress? What STRESS??
			 Quote: 
 Is 31/21 what you meant to write? Chris '86 with 22/29's | ||
|  08-14-2002, 07:53 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: McLean, VA 
					Posts: 1,155
				 | 
			Chris, Yes - 31 drilled [hollow] Sandens rear, 21 solids front. Revalved shocks, street poly bushings, sway bars as above. Beautiful! 
				__________________ Tony K '89 944T 944 SuperCup Champ 2004 & 2005 '85 Carrera - Sold [sob] TrackVision 944Cup The 999 Site | ||
|  08-14-2002, 08:25 PM | 
 | 
| Formerly bb80sc Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Hollywood Beach, CA 
					Posts: 4,361
				 | Quote: 
 thanks -Brad 80SC | ||
|  08-15-2002, 12:59 AM | 
 | 
| Irrationally exuberant | Quote: 
 If the 31 is the measured size of the hollow bars that would make more sense. A hollow 31 would be equivelent to something like a 29 or 30. I think stock sizes in '85 were 18.8 and 24.5 so if your bars were really 21f/31r the fronts would be 1.55 times as stiff as stock but the rears would be 2.56 times as stiff as stock - a pretty weird combination! If you want to play Torsion Bars, the Home Game. Here's how: Stiffness of a torsion bar increases with the 4th power of the diameter i.e. twice as thick is 16 times as stiff (=2x2x2x2). Stiffness increase = (new bar thickness / old bar thickness) ** 4 18.8->21 = 1.55X 24.5->27 = 1,.47 24.5->28 = 1.71X 24.5->29 = 1.96X 24.5->31 = 2.56X Note: '86 cars had 25mm rear bars. If you used that number, a 28mm rear bar (1.57X) would be great match for a 21 front (155X). -Chris | ||
|  08-15-2002, 03:38 AM | 
 |