|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
1997 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.8 GT2 Clone ( Your Opinions Matter )
Hello All,
Have a real soft spot for the wild ones! Interested in this GT2 clone. Wondering if anyone local to Top Gear Imports had gone in and look it over? Any thoughts or opinions are greatly appreciated. Thank you!
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Seattle
Posts: 376
|
No opinion other than the usual ones. With a build this radical, you need documentation. If there's no documentation, then I would mentally budget in the cost of a rebuild on top of whatever other issues a PPI discovers.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,393
|
Hi
People seem to like these highly modified cars, never got excited about these cars.
Some look great, but a very hard sell in any climate. These cars must be well documented on what they did because it’s personal choices and it’s a small group. Why would a 97 be modified like that? What’s its value? No one knows, for $119,000 unless you do not care, it’s throwing money down a **** hole. For that dough, build your own or get a real GT2 for not much more. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: In Traffic
Posts: 1,801
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I thought the C2S was RWD, why does the ad say 4wd and 2wd?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Need build specifics, documentation, contact info for the person/shop that did the engine build, and lots of pictures of the engine. Not sure if I missed something, but I did not see any pics of the engine.
__________________
1975 911s Restomod, 2005 MV Agusta F4 AGO, 2002 Moto Guzzi V11 Scura, 1983 BMW R100RT, 1978 R100S, 1989 R100RS, 1991 R100 classic (x2), 2023 Ford F150 Lightning SOLD: 93 R100R, 03 R1150GSA, 85 R100S Mono, 03 996 turbo, 16 Norton 961 Commando, 03 R1100s BCR, 77 R100s, 09 S63 AMG, 74 911, 88 R100RS, 78 930, 01 996 C4, 05 Cayenne, 09 Audi TT, 03 Moto Guzzi V11 LeMans, 07 WRX STI, 03 R1150GSA, 78 R100/7, 01 Audi S4, 98 Audi A4, 98 R1200c, 78 GL1000, 92 Accord, 89 KE100 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,649
|
Didn't we discuss the car a couple of years back? If I get some free time after work maybe I'll do some searching to see if I can find it. It may have even been at the same dealer.
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,187
|
Looks cool, but it’s a Protomotive built motor, that’s enough to lose my interest in it.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: mpls
Posts: 9
|
I get squeamish around any naturally aspirated to turbo conversion. Find a factory turbo base for that money
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
This was previously owned by a friend of mine. It was a decent enough build. IIRC it was done by Paul and John at Protosport for the prior owner. It was a bit rough when he picked it up but was putting a lot of TLC into it before he sold it. I don't recall the wheels it current has although I had some pictures of it but can't seem to locate them. I think they offered him a price he couldn't refuse and is now looking for a C2S or C4S so he can take the kids for a ride.
I never heard him complain about the car and he really enjoyed it but wasn't kid friendly. Asking price is a bit lofty IMO but a lot of work to build.
__________________
Anthony PCA affiliate '77 member '83 '90 3.8 RS tribute, 91 C4 converted to C2,'93 964 C2, '93 928 GTS M '94 Turbo 3.6, '15 Boxster GTS M,16 GT4,23 Macan GTS, Gone worth mentioning '71 E '79 SC, '79 built to '74 3.0 RS tribute (2390 # 270 hp), '80 928 euro 5 speed, '74 2.0l 914, '89 944 S2,'04 Cayenne TT '14 boxster, '14 Cayenne GTS 14 Cayman S, 18 Macan GTS many others |
||
|
|
|
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,649
|
Quote:
Pat Williams used to service a real 993 RSR. They pulled the engine and installed one of Pat’s small displacement turbo builds. Races it like that in PCA Club racing for a decade or more. A couple years back the owner decided to sell it. They pulled the old engine off the shelf and converted it back. Last I heard Orbit racing was restoring it for the new owner. These cars are like LEGO.
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Mountain Lakes, NJ
Posts: 332
|
I don't know anything about the Protomotive kit, but a number of guys I go to the track with have Protosport built turbo track cars. (993 RSR, heavily modified widebody 996 and a few more). They all seem happy with them and I haven't noticed them having any issues.
__________________
the third foot™ adjustable heel/toe pedal is back! http://www.wingsaircooled.com https://youtu.be/U0PZbc55gqw Instagram: @wingsaircooled |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
Anthony PCA affiliate '77 member '83 '90 3.8 RS tribute, 91 C4 converted to C2,'93 964 C2, '93 928 GTS M '94 Turbo 3.6, '15 Boxster GTS M,16 GT4,23 Macan GTS, Gone worth mentioning '71 E '79 SC, '79 built to '74 3.0 RS tribute (2390 # 270 hp), '80 928 euro 5 speed, '74 2.0l 914, '89 944 S2,'04 Cayenne TT '14 boxster, '14 Cayenne GTS 14 Cayman S, 18 Macan GTS many others |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3
|
Top Gear is notorious for having cars on the website that are no longer even for sale. I’ve seen cars sit on their website two or three years after they’ve been sold! They are the worst at this! I Don’t trust those guys at all
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 249
|
Quote:
There are pluses and minuses with each engine as a foundation. Having built both to 550-600hp I prefer the NA vs the turbo as a starting point. The transmission ring gear on the turbo is stronger (larger) and seems to be better starting point for modding gears. The NA gear spread is wider and starts being preferable as power goes up. Both have horrible first gears. Turbo 6th is useless. It’s kinda a toss up which is better to start with. Starting with a turbo based car is a safer bet though. The work required to get it right on a NA based build leaves a large margin for error. I see more shoddy fabrication work than good. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: mpls
Posts: 9
|
think that's the gotchas point...inheriting a built car (unknowns) vs. building your own (knowns). two entirely different price points, weight the risks and choose your path forward
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Seattle
Posts: 376
|
Quote:
i was interested in an 88 twin turbo build that started life as a narrow body coupe. it looked like a great build (G50, coilovers, full sized intercooler), but had zero documentation coming with it. i just couldn't trust it so backed out. |
||
|
|
|
|
Turbonut
|
Proper build needs most crucial parts to be replaced anyway so what's the point in starting with real RS/R/Turbo? It is false economy.
__________________
'83 924 (2.6 16v Turbo, 530hp),'67 911 hot-rod /2.4S, '78 924 Carrera GT project (2.0 turbo 340 hp), '84 928 S 4.7 Euro (VEMS PnP, 332 HP), '90 944 S2 Cabriolet http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
A low boost turbo setup can be used on a stock N/A engine and work very nicely without issue if done properly.
__________________
Anthony PCA affiliate '77 member '83 '90 3.8 RS tribute, 91 C4 converted to C2,'93 964 C2, '93 928 GTS M '94 Turbo 3.6, '15 Boxster GTS M,16 GT4,23 Macan GTS, Gone worth mentioning '71 E '79 SC, '79 built to '74 3.0 RS tribute (2390 # 270 hp), '80 928 euro 5 speed, '74 2.0l 914, '89 944 S2,'04 Cayenne TT '14 boxster, '14 Cayenne GTS 14 Cayman S, 18 Macan GTS many others |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 9
|
Any ideas where this car ended up? I was very interested in it, but it sold before I could make it up there to check it out.
|
||
|
|
|