![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
275hp at 6500 from a 2.2?
__________________
Gary R. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 870
|
That would be 101ft-lbs torque per liter; not happening from a 2-valve head without a turbo.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk |
||
![]() |
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,517
|
Typo?
![]()
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,199
|
That sounds more realistic. Just not possible with 2.2 liters at 6500 rpm. It would be a very hard task really with a liter more displacement at that RPM.Even then I don't know if it's possible.
I know some Shops have some very "happy" dynos though. One shop in CA (not a Porsche specialist AFAIK) constantly quotes dyno figures yet I've never seen a sheet from them and the stated HP is really impossible for what the motor is. Let alone the camshaft used. They are popular among the Datsun Z guys. And don't even get me started on the games you can play with chassis dynos. Chassis dynos are good for selling parts and that's about it really.
__________________
High quality metal, body and paint work http://www.spiuserforum.com/index.php?threads/are-you-looking-for-a-shop-i-am-available-in-virginia.9030/ |
||
![]() |
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,517
|
Chris,
A 1970 911s 2.2l makes 180hp at 6500tpm.
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,199
|
Matt I was referring to the 275 hp number not being possible. I was agreeing with you. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
__________________
High quality metal, body and paint work http://www.spiuserforum.com/index.php?threads/are-you-looking-for-a-shop-i-am-available-in-virginia.9030/ |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
It's a 914 ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ossining, NY
Posts: 4,685
|
Typo, or just misinformed
|
||
![]() |
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,517
|
Got it now.
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Mine will be on a dyno sometime around May 2025. If I remember I'll post real world numbers. Best guess is 170-190hp.
|
||
![]() |
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,517
|
The ad does say it has bigger bores, so it might be a short stroke 2.5 or something similar. But even then, 2.5l ST engines were “only” 250hp., and at 8000
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 Last edited by Matt Monson; 10-18-2024 at 09:08 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I was young and sorta smart, Have the paperwork for the 2.2's. Not smart enough to know about the cam grinds, probably stock 2.0 s. Dyno is strictly for MFI tuning. Data will be a perk.
Orchard grass is up, rain. That's the reason the car is sitting inside til spring. To bad you are a few states away. I'd trade tractor time for knowledge ![]() |
||
![]() |
|