![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 179
|
WHP to engine %?
How much % of lost do you all count with in our 930/965
I heard quite different numbers. For example Larry at cis flowtech claims it has 20% of lost at the wheels. Can it really be that much of lost? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,470
|
As we do not have a driveshaft, universal joints etc, I would estimate 15% loss.
__________________
Ole Skool - wouldn't have it any other way |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
15% is what I’ve heard most but don’t know anyone who’s done a chassis to engine dyno comparison.
__________________
2014 Cayman S (track rat w/GT4 suspension) 1979 930 (475 rwhp at 0.95 bar) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Fla
Posts: 1,864
|
Depending on the mfg of the dyno it varies, we had a DTS and a very good room when I was at JB Racing, we dynoed our engine in the morning same day and conditions back in the car to a 500 hp Dynojet and the loss was 17% on a 350 hp at the crank engine, we did several others from 2.0 to 3.8 and was pretty close with the rest, the mustangs as I understand are a bit stingy but can’t say for sure the dynapac with direct mount to hub are very close and because they remove the tire slip factor make a very smooth curve.
Hope this helps, Mike Bruns |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Glorious Pac NW
Posts: 4,184
|
Quote:
__________________
'77 S with '78 930 power and a few other things. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,855
|
Similar experience going from MODE's engine dyno then onto a Dynapack chassis dyno: 13%
__________________
Chris Carroll TurboKraft, Inc. Tel. 480.969.0911 email: info@turbokraft.com http://www.facebook.com/TurboKraft - http://www.instagram.com/TurboKraft |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |