![]() |
|
|
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,125
|
Have any of you heard about 'quick spool valves'?
I stumbled on this tonight on the webs after riding in my friend's 750 hp S/C'd '06 Viper. After feeling the pull of that beast, I really wanted to achieve quicker spool since mine feels a little anemic now.
When I was searching the webs for a split-scroll housing for my Turbonetics turbo, I discovered 'quick spool valves' and how many have made huge gains regarding spool time creating higher tq/hp at low-RPM's dyno verified. Essentially, it is a valve with a single butterfly that is attached between the turbo and the header or manifold which chokes off one side of the scroll decreasing A/R. Here is the catch; you have to have a split-scroll housing with an open-plenum header or manifold for it to work. At low RPM's, the butterfly is in the closed position cutting the A/R down to roughly half! So, if you have an .84 A/R and the valve is closed, you now have a .42 A/R accelerating turbine speeds! Once you achieve a given boost level, the valve will open and give you roughly 95% of the original A/R. The reason of the ~5% loss is the butterfly and shaft taking up area. I did a search here and found nothing.... I know these cars would gain tremendously from this valve. I would love to play with one. Please discuss. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Cory - turbo'd '87 C3.2 Guards/Blk, 3.4, 7.5:1 CR P & C's, 993SS cams, Borg-Warner S366 turbo @ 1.2-1.5 bar, depending on mood ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Metal Guru
|
That is way cool.
How is the butterfly actuated? Electric or vacuum? I wonder if there would any durability issues with the butterfly operation long-term in such a harsh environment? It would be worth a try, despite any potential drawbacks.
__________________
Paul B. '91 964 3.3 Turbo Port matched, SC cams, K27/K29 turbo, Roush Performance custom headers w/Tial MV-S dual wastegates, Rarlyl8 muffler, LWFW, GT2 clutch & PP, BL wur, factory RS shifter, RS mounts, FVD timing mod, Big Reds, H&R Coilovers, ESB spring plates- 210 lb |
||
![]() |
|
Crotchety Old Bastard
|
I researched that some time ago.
The theory is sound from what I can see, the most immediate problems are: > The valve assembly is 3/4" thick and sits on top the T3 turbo flange on the headers. This would make the turbo sit 3/4" higher which we have no room for. Custom headers would be required. > Longevity of the valve itself. These turbos glow red, how is that valve going to live in that environment long term? The proper valve/housing to do this right would cost huge money. Having said that I do intend to try this out and will make a set of custom headers. The headers cannot be split plenum as mine are. The valve is actuated by boost pressure.
__________________
RarlyL8 Motorsports / M&K Exhaust - 911/930 Exhaust Systems, Turbos, TiAL, CIS Mods/Rebuilds '78 911SC Widebody, 930 engine, 915 Tranny, K27, SC Cams, RL8 Headers & GT3 Muffler. 350whp @ 0.75bar Brian B. (256)536-9977 Service@MKExhaust Brian@RarlyL8 |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,125
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Cory - turbo'd '87 C3.2 Guards/Blk, 3.4, 7.5:1 CR P & C's, 993SS cams, Borg-Warner S366 turbo @ 1.2-1.5 bar, depending on mood ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,125
|
This is obviously geared for drag racing and but it may work on small tracks too if you could really dial in the right transition to fully open.
I read it is better than twin turbos. That's a bold statement I read!
__________________
Cory - turbo'd '87 C3.2 Guards/Blk, 3.4, 7.5:1 CR P & C's, 993SS cams, Borg-Warner S366 turbo @ 1.2-1.5 bar, depending on mood ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
So this is like a variable-vane turbo, then, but not as efficient.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,581
|
Would the enviroment be an better/worse than a turbo with an internal wastegate? Just askin...
__________________
'89 911 M491+Turbo '89 944 Turbo '88 928S4 '18 C63S Coupe |
||
![]() |
|