![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
kinda slow
|
those that used the GSF crank trigger wheel, did you have to modify the engine mount?
Mine isn't even close to fitting. I have the 36-1 wheel with AC. Car is a US 3.0 SC. Is there a mounting plate that will clear or do I need to modify this one?
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
strange. Mine fit perfect. Is it correct type, especially OD ? I'll see if I can take a picture of mine
__________________
80SC (ex California) |
||
![]() |
|
It's a 914 ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ossining, NY
Posts: 4,690
|
I’ve noticed that GSF makes a 158mm pulley, listed as being for a 965 turbo. That one is substantially larger than the stock one for a 3.2. Did you wind up with one of those?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Lucky you, my buddy showed up today with his 930 which has a two groove GSF pulley on it. No issues at all, the engine carrier to pulley must have had at least 1/2" clearance at the front, more on the sides. They must have sent you the wrong one.
__________________
1986 Targa Guards Red 2021 MT09 SP |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I had to change to the 3.2 engine mount console on my SC to fit the GSF double pulley.
__________________
Rick 1978 911SC |
||
![]() |
|
kinda slow
|
Fun update for future reference. I posted a WTB ad and bought a 3.2 carrier for way more than I wanted (yay Porsche parts!). Little did I realize that there are multiple types (because of course there are
![]() My fault, I guess I didn't research enough and now have two useless mounts. Last edited by shamrok; 07-17-2019 at 08:52 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
kinda slow
|
I checked, it's the stock diameter, just sticks out more. 3.2 carrier has a noticeably lower cut for the pulley from pictures I've seen.
|
||
![]() |
|
kinda slow
|
|||
![]() |
|
kinda slow
|
I think all the 930s I've seen with conversions have been later ones that I assume are similar to 3.2 carriers, and so it's been a non-issue, or else I'm sure I would have seen it. I've e-mailed back and forth with GSF and they really didn't have a good solution other than buy a 3.2 carrier or grind away metal. I chose the former as I thought doing the latter would look ghetto, but now I'm so fed up I just might cut a big hole in the original and live with it for a while. Ugh.
|
||
![]() |
|
scumbag
|
Quote:
Sorry you're having fitment issues. I wish I had something helpful to add.
__________________
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/989493-my-low-budget-dream-car-build.html https://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-cars-sale/1180319-fs-1979-widebody-lightweight-coupe-hotrod.html AchtungKraft #009 - IG: @doktor_b |
||
![]() |
|
kinda slow
|
eBay messages worked for me, but it’s pretty minimal interaction. Very short and not terribly helpful advice. The kit itself is nice but it’d be nice if they disclosed that it may require modifying the engine mounts, which I didn’t plan for and is now holding up everything.
|
||
![]() |
|
kinda slow
|
So, question, does anybody know if a 3.2 coupe carrier plate will absolutely line up with the SC studs? I bought a 3.2 carrier for a Cabriolet but it won't line up, so it's a paperweight and I hate to buy yet another plate that doesn't fit.
After hacking the hell out of my engine carrier plate to see if there was any way to make it work...not a chance. While it now clears the wheel, you can't slip a belt in there. It snags right where the stud bolts to plate (circled in red), and after grinding away up and in towards it, there's just no way without compromising the stud mount. Super frustrating and don't know how to proceed next. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|