![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,267
|
2.4 Stroker Engine from a 2.2 ?
I have seen ads as well as postings for "2.4 Stroker engine" where a 2.2 case used in conjunction with at 2.4/2.7 crank and then the 2.4/2.7 rods as well. What are the issues with this setup or rather what needs to be done to make this a "reliable" engine.
Thanks David |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
As far as I know it isn't much different then the stock 2.4. There may be some differences in regards to case version and stuff. But if done right I doubt that the performance would be any different then a stock 2.4.
__________________
John '69 911E "It's a poor craftsman who blames their tools" -- Unknown "Any suspension -- no matter how poorly designed -- can be made to work reasonably well if you just stop it from moving." -- Colin Chapman Last edited by jluetjen; 01-19-2004 at 11:37 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
up-fixing der car(ma)
|
That's what the factory did to get 2.4 liters...
__________________
Scott Kinder kindersport @ gmail.com |
||
![]() |
|
Author of "101 Projects"
|
If you use the 2.2 pistons, it will be a higher compression engine. If you use the 2.4 pistons, then it will be the same as a 2.4...
-Wayne
__________________
Wayne R. Dempsey, Founder, Pelican Parts Inc., and Author of: 101 Projects for Your BMW 3-Series • 101 Projects for Your Porsche 911 • How to Rebuild & Modify Porsche 911 Engines • 101 Projects for Your Porsche Boxster & Cayman • 101 Projects for Your Porsche 996 / 997 • SPEED READ: Porsche 911 Check out our new site: Dempsey Motorsports |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,247
|
Wayne, I saw that engine configuration recommended in a section of your book using E pistons and E cams with 40 webers. Is it fair to say the output would be similar to a stock 2.4E or does the increase in compression buy you more performance? The compression increase seems small.
__________________
"Rust never sleeps" |
||
![]() |
|