![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 36
|
![]()
Hi guys. As checking AF ratios follow a good rebuild, I thought this might be a good place to query AF ratios.
I purchased a MoTec PLM (professional lambda meter) today so I can measure AF ratios on my 993tt engine. The MoTec only has one sensor and my engine has two separate, independant exhaust piping. How do I measure each side at the same time?? The easiest way is to purchase TWO MoTecs, but at better than $1,000 each I find it hard to do. Do Porsche owners usually measure one side at a time? Is there a lamda sensor (accurate) that can take two sensors at a time? Jaime |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cheraw, SC
Posts: 811
|
Dang, $1000 each, that's steep. I hope it does alot more than measure AFR's.
For a cheaper alternative check out www.tuneyourengine.com The Innovate LM1 is a good unit.
__________________
Brian Keith Smith |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 36
|
Wow, Brian.....thanks for the tip!! I'll buy two of the stand alone kits and be more or less at the same price!
Thank you SIR!! Jaime |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,313
|
I had a company in Sonoma make me a dual a/f gauge for $170. Looks like the gauge in the picture except it has dual a/f meter.
http://www.westach.com/images/showcase/3DC2-1-Dual_EGT.jpg I mounted a 02 sensor at each collector. I paid about $50 ea. for the 02 sensors. I mounted the gauge in a old clock housing and now resides in the clock hole in my race car. 74 rsr w/3.4 twin plug.
__________________
Harold '79 930/DP935 (sold) '68 VW 3.3 Turbo Crewcab |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,910
|
Quote:
__________________
Thank you for your time, |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,910
|
Re: Using an AF ratio meter on our Porsches
Quote:
__________________
Thank you for your time, Last edited by beepbeep; 09-29-2005 at 11:21 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Port Macquarie Australia
Posts: 510
|
I noticed that www.innovatemotorsports.com now has the LC-1 for under $200 which is flexible enough to even tune individual cylinders by using multiple LC-1 kits (ST-12 Kit). It lacks logging.. but will give you real time data to a laptop and progammable outputs to drive A/F guages.
I just ordered a kit so I can do my bi-annual A/F adjutement on my 930 using my laptop
__________________
2008 BMW 320i 2006 Mercedes ML320 2004 Mercedes ML270 cdi 1998 Porsche Boxter 1988 Porsche 930 Targa (sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Momence, IL 60954
Posts: 1,911
|
I'll vouch for the LM-1. I've tuned a few engines with one to set up custom fuel maps for EFI conversions. It's a lifesaver. Same with carbs, but it's not as fun to change jets as it is to hit a few keys.
__________________
Charles Navarro President, LN Engineering and Bilt Racing Service http://www.LNengineering.com Home of Nickies, IMS Retrofit, and IMS Solution |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 36
|
You guys ROCK!
I was able to get a killer deal at www.titanmotorsports.com I got two for less than I paid for the MoTec. Now, If i could only get educated on what ratios I should be looking for at idle/part accleration/wide open throttle for my Ruf ecu/cams. I think Ruf protects this info, not readily available I suppose. Jaime |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Momence, IL 60954
Posts: 1,911
|
In my personal experience tuning, I found that 13.8:1 was a sweet spot I aimed for, but some engines like 12-12.8:1 at WOT or under or near full 100% loads. If you can run closed loop at say highway conditions, something near stoich is common with OEMS. Just don't try to run closed loop at low rpms, high rpms, or high loads.
__________________
Charles Navarro President, LN Engineering and Bilt Racing Service http://www.LNengineering.com Home of Nickies, IMS Retrofit, and IMS Solution |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 206
|
Hi,
Just as a tip: 13.8 at WOT sounds a little lean for a turbo car for thermal (not power) reasons. The closer you get to stoich (14.7) the higher the cyl. head and piston crown temps. Therefore also more knock probability. CHTs have a peak at around stoich. For a street driven car at partial load and idle go for stoich (14.7) for smog reasons. On a race-car at partial load I would go for ~15-16 if possible (avoid lean surge). That makes it run at best BSFC and therefore can lengthen the time between refueling stops. Regards, Klaus |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Momence, IL 60954
Posts: 1,911
|
Sorry about that- should have clarified that 13.8:1 was N/A, not for a turbo car :-) You're totally right on that.
__________________
Charles Navarro President, LN Engineering and Bilt Racing Service http://www.LNengineering.com Home of Nickies, IMS Retrofit, and IMS Solution |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Momence, IL 60954
Posts: 1,911
|
As Klaus said, it goes without saying that you should monitor head temperatures as well as AFRs for a more accurate picture of true performance. In both cases that I was tuning at 13.8:1 I had quad chts (it was a type 4) and the engine actually ran cooler at 13.8:1 than at 12.8:1. It's about finding what your engine likes and needs.
__________________
Charles Navarro President, LN Engineering and Bilt Racing Service http://www.LNengineering.com Home of Nickies, IMS Retrofit, and IMS Solution |
||
![]() |
|
drag racing the short bus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Location, Location...
Posts: 21,983
|
I want to teach myself the intricacies of a/f ratios as my '83 3.0 engine has been pinging during WOT at full load in very warm weather conditions. Will any of the listed a/f meters in this thread work with CIS?
Thanks. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Momence, IL 60954
Posts: 1,911
|
Yes, you'll need to weld in the o2 sensor bung on your exhaust- the closer to the engine the better, although if you get a heated sensor like what comes with the LM-1, it's not so much of an issue. Most definately do it before the muffler and any cat.
__________________
Charles Navarro President, LN Engineering and Bilt Racing Service http://www.LNengineering.com Home of Nickies, IMS Retrofit, and IMS Solution |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 712
|
Another option for a WBO2 and data logger:
http://www.zeitronix.com/ I use one to tune and log my 930, works well!
__________________
1986 911 Turbo 3.3L, K27HFS, Tial 46mm, TurboKraft Intercooler, 964 Cams, Monty Muffler, MS3Pro Evo, M&W Ignition, Zietronix WBO2 Data Logger, Wevo shifter, coupler and motor mounts. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Momence, IL 60954
Posts: 1,911
|
Another option would be SDS's (simple digital systems- Canada co.) wideband (as well as excellent fuel and ingition systems).
__________________
Charles Navarro President, LN Engineering and Bilt Racing Service http://www.LNengineering.com Home of Nickies, IMS Retrofit, and IMS Solution |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 206
|
Quote:
Regards, Klaus |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I took the www.efi101.com class which has good info for tuning without blowing up your engine.
From the course book lambda for high boost should be .80 to .85 and for low/medium boost .82 to .87.
__________________
2014 Cayman S (track rat w/GT4 suspension) 1979 930 (475 rwhp at 0.95 bar) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 36
|
Are these lambda measures for NA engines or turbo engines or does it matter?
|
||
![]() |
|