![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 26
|
3.3 Turbo to 3.4 or 3.5 ? Help me Decide
Hello everyone, I am planning my full rebuild on my 91' 3.3T and most of my choices are already made up however I keep going back and forth on the P&C's
Option 1) Supertec 3.4 ...QSC's hand selected by Henry w/ JE's Option 2) I go to 3.5 however Case machining required...Costs? I have no idea Dilemna: Is it really worth it? I can tell you I am aiming towards a 550HP street monster with all the goodies including EFI but I am unsure if the 3.4 to 3.5 is really worth the trouble/costs. Any feednack would be GREATLY appreciated, including the pricing of Option 2 ...I already have a good idea of pricing for Option 1. Thanks Everyone PS: I want to keep the stock crank size
__________________
91' 964 Turbo.. Andial goodies and Nice exhaust 69' Superbee (Old School) 70' 440-6 Pack Cuda ( Not finished yet)) 03' Z06 Vette Last edited by Barracuda; 01-30-2008 at 06:14 AM.. Reason: crank |
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
For a Turbo engine I would talk to Stephen Kaspar at Imagine Auto.
With a Turbo motor, it just depends on what you want to spend. I would also look at the sleeved cylinders that JB Racing has. Lots of folks have been there done that -
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 26
|
Maybe I should add this, I am doing 90% of the work myself with the exception of a final EFI tune and the machining of the head work.
I am trying to decide if the jump to 3.5 will make a fairly considerable difference, I realize their is more money involved and yes, I wouldn't mind knowing a ballpark price too. It's not really a matter of money versus a matter of gain...meaning if I could just take another route elsewhere in my build to achieve the same thing with less headache I may opt to go that route or if this would make a substantial difference overall I will deal with the cost involved. Hope that came out right
__________________
91' 964 Turbo.. Andial goodies and Nice exhaust 69' Superbee (Old School) 70' 440-6 Pack Cuda ( Not finished yet)) 03' Z06 Vette |
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
In the days of the K-27 - you wanted to maximize displacement to gain low speed driveability. In the new age of bb turbos and performance pop off valves - Not sure that is as necessary.
If it were my engine - I would probably look at staying with the 3.4 slip in - figure around 800-1000 for enlarging your jugs. The yellowbird does ok with the 3.4 - although that is a twin turbo.
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 760
|
Stick with the 3.4's. its the biggest you can go without machining the case (which you will have to do with the 3.5).
I am running 3.4 Mahle Yellowbird pistons and cylinders in mine. More expensive, but can't beat the quality. as for low end driveability, make sure you swap out the cams. you will need a special grind since your going EFI. Talk to Steven Kaspar at IA as he is the guru when it comes to EFI
__________________
John A. 1979 Porsche 930: 3.4L, SC cams, Twin plug, Leask WUR, Custom SSI turbo exhaust, Tial WG, K27HFS, and we can't forget the Zork (short lived depending on my homeowners assoc.) 05 Boxster S: For the Track. 06 Dodge Ram 2500 Power Wagon: Tow Vehicle |
||
![]() |
|
3.4 Bigger is better
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 1,497
|
I put in QSC's 3.4/JE combo. Bought from Supertec. If you want to go to 3.5's Charles at www.lnengineering.com has slip fit 3.5 cylinders. I don't think they are listed on the web site yet but are available. Fantastic quality especially for a turbo application due to the large number of cooling fins. You would need to do a twin plug with that size of piston. Charles posts here at PP as CNavarro. Great project to do.
![]()
__________________
Michael 88 911 Diamond Blue CE Carrera 3.4 HC3.4 member 2020 Honda Passport |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 26
|
Yeah, I actually notices the 3.5 Nickies listed right here at the Pelican store as a "slip fit" and honestly...I thought it was a typo
![]() Let's say I was to go the Nickies route to 3.5 versus 3.4... What kind of extra power do you think is there?
__________________
91' 964 Turbo.. Andial goodies and Nice exhaust 69' Superbee (Old School) 70' 440-6 Pack Cuda ( Not finished yet)) 03' Z06 Vette |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Momence, IL 60954
Posts: 1,911
|
I'll be devil's advocate - you could always take your stock cylinders too and strip them, bore, and replate to 98. Sure as safe a bet as going with a set of new mahle 98s, just with JE's of course.
And yes, I do have slip-fit 100s. :-) Our material is just that damn good! That's how I've also gotten away with slip fit 103s for the 3.6 and even machine in 105s (and have been even toying with doing something bigger).
__________________
Charles Navarro President, LN Engineering and Bilt Racing Service http://www.LNengineering.com Home of Nickies, IMS Retrofit, and IMS Solution |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 26
|
Don't be the devils advocate Charles, I've read about your cylinders and they are wonderful....Spill the beans on the 3.4 to 3.5 difference, assume I'm getting the Nickies either way
![]() I want this car to be very quick however It's unknown to me as to what type of HP gain this will achieve
__________________
91' 964 Turbo.. Andial goodies and Nice exhaust 69' Superbee (Old School) 70' 440-6 Pack Cuda ( Not finished yet)) 03' Z06 Vette |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 26
|
Oh. come on, someone answer my last post
![]()
__________________
91' 964 Turbo.. Andial goodies and Nice exhaust 69' Superbee (Old School) 70' 440-6 Pack Cuda ( Not finished yet)) 03' Z06 Vette |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Momence, IL 60954
Posts: 1,911
|
I didn't get a notification email! :-)
Well, more displacement is always a good thing! How much boost are you planning on putting though the engine - maybe a twin plug 3.5, 8.0:1, new head studs, with about a bar of boost will be a very healthy engine. Single plug, then maybe 7.5:1. If you want to run more boost, it might be better to go with the 98s, since the tops are a bit thicker, and there is more room to do a flame ring. It all boils down to what your long term goals are for the engine.
__________________
Charles Navarro President, LN Engineering and Bilt Racing Service http://www.LNengineering.com Home of Nickies, IMS Retrofit, and IMS Solution |
||
![]() |
|