![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 2,018
|
2.7 rebuild with 8.5rs piston S cams...
Hi everybody.
After being a member for a short period of time, reading and learning from everybody I decided to rebuild my first aircooled engine. I just disassembled the engine. I'm inspecting everything and deciding what way to go. I have to thank Tom Butler for kindly answering my rookie questions and suppling plenty of parts. Thank you Tom. Anyway, I'm not super familiar with the Porsche engines other than the internet and all the manuals and books I could get my honds on. I want to build something fun and reliable to learn and take over bigger future projects. Fun street car. Old engine was running, smoking at high rpm and gear changes. I'm going to do all the upgrades for reliability. Tensioners, Exhaust, Fan, Case save. valve covers... I wanted to go fully stock but Tom got me the bug and I'm thinking that I want to go with 8.5cr RS pistons, hot cam(possibly S) and carburetors. Do you see a problem rebuilding the engine with the new pistons and cams and leaving the CIS during break-in period? My only experience with carbs is on my old chevy 4barrel edelbrock. For this reason I want to troubleshoot the engine first and them move to fuel supply. I'm not comfortable doing both and I feel having the engine ready will allow me to work on the carbs and focus on their own problems. Any thoughts? Advice. Words of wisdom? |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
The S cams will not work with CIS. It is very sensitive to intake reversion. This is where the upgoing piston on the compression stroke forces some air back out the intake due to the intake valve being open. The intake valve is open because at higher rpms, there is enough momentum in the incoming air to cram more into the cylinder and compress it a little as the piston starts coming up.
The reversion causes the CIS throttle flap to oscillate and provide funky fueling and bad mixture. You would need to have the CIS cam in there with CIS. Carbs can only be tuned to the cam you are going to use, otherwise tuning to the CIS cam is worthless.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 2,018
|
I guess my engine rebuild crush course is going to include an appendix on individual body carburetors also. Go figure. I will post pictures soon. Right now heating up head studs cherry red in this lovely 20 degree weather. Yes and they are coming out on at time. Happy Holidays.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 209
|
Just a word of encouragement I have a 2.7 with Mahle rs pistons and E cams with PMO carbs and it's wonderful. Pulls strong all the way till the limiter says woah!! Good luck.
__________________
Wally in Montreal, Canada My age 50 something,P- Car's age 30 something 2.7 911S PMO 40's , E cams, RS pistons/cylinders, MSD6AL, Pertronix, SSI's, M+K 2 in 2 out. Perfect studs (whew!) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,346
|
I'd recommend the following cam choices: Solex, E, GE-40, Mod-S. The "S" cams are just to weak below 5000 RPM. The Solex and "E" cams can use stock valve springs to 7000 RPM and will provide a much better driving experience (even on the track) than the "S" cams. I'd done both on my car and when I switched from the Solex cams to the "S" cams I was dissappointed. GE-40/Mod-S cams will give every bit as much power as the "S" cams and still have the low end torque of the Solex cams but will require stiffer valve springs due to increased ramp rates.
-Andy
__________________
72 Carrera RS replica, Spec 911 racer |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Good luck and keep us up to date, looking forward to the progress.
__________________
79 SC unmolested 75 911 backdated RSR widebody 71 911T having fun skinny 63 356 outlaw frustrating purists 25 GTS |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fallbrook, Ca. 92028
Posts: 14,042
|
I whole heartedly endorse the DC40 / mod "S" cams. In our last project (2.45 lt, 9.5 :1, 36 mm ports, SSI exhaust, 40 mm Webers) we made 180 RWHP and it pulled from the ground up.
If you have a good set of 90mm Nikasil barrels, I have a new set of RS pistons for sale. The set comes with 6 matched pistons, rings, pins and clips. Email me if you're interested. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 2,018
|
Thanks for the answers.
Considering the E cams or Solex. Trying to build a fun street machine not a track car exclusively. I like the idea of better power among the whole range not just top over 5k. I will post pics after I finish tearing the engine apart. Happy New Year, Cheers!!! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 2,018
|
I saw a nice post about duration and valve lift.
I like Solex Cams on paper. I think would get best drivebility and good punch when pushed. Question... Solex cams will work with the stock 911s heads, right? Assuming Im using 8.5rs pistons. Do I have to worry about other problems? (valve clearence, valve springs stiffnes, others) thank you. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,346
|
The will work with stock heads and the RS pistons. You should always check clearances however, because they are often close to mins.
-Andy
__________________
72 Carrera RS replica, Spec 911 racer |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 2,018
|
Just spoke with John Dougherty.
We are going with Solex, based on car use and 8.5CR He sugested if I was going to track the car I should go with DC40 moving the Hp and rpm curve to the right. I want more longevity out the rebuilt not planning to go over 7K rpms. That is also why S cams are out. Staying in the 3k to 6.5k for a nice street rod. He is doing my rocker arms too. Pictures coming, thanks |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, NY
Posts: 21,140
|
Quote:
works great for me it's very street drivable with plenty of 3-4k torque and doesn't load plugs doing so. It makes a stock 3.2/G-50 look weak imho changing cams at this engine state is no big deal so the E is a personal choice different strokes
__________________
Ronin LB '77 911s 2.7 PMO E 8.5 SSI Monty MSD JPI w x6 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
72 911 Although it is done at the moment, it will never be finished. |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fallbrook, Ca. 92028
Posts: 14,042
|
RS spec 2.7 with Solex cams is what I have in my 914-6 and it is a very nice combination.
Far better than the E cams for an every day driver. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3
|
S cams will not work with the CIS. It is very sensitive to the contribution of reversion. That stamp is rising on the compression stroke forces the air again taken as a result of the intake valve open. The intake valve is open, because at high speed, there is enough momentum in the incoming air to cram more into the cylinder and slightly compress the piston begins to rise. Reversion causes CIS throttle flap swing and funky and make food a bad mixture. You must have the Cam IEC within the CIS. Carbohydrates can be attached to the cam you need, if not the adjustment of cam CIS is worthless.
__________________
Translia |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, NY
Posts: 21,140
|
Quote:
i was told head work should be done if using Solex what say you
__________________
Ronin LB '77 911s 2.7 PMO E 8.5 SSI Monty MSD JPI w x6 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 2,018
|
After talking to John and other people I'm just redoing the heads stock. Call it a refresh.
They told me I would need stiffer springs for really high RPMs (and S cams) . over 7k. I'm going to limit the then engine to 6.5k so stock should be OK. Porting and polishing would be an unnecessary expense for the street use of the car. We shall see..... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 7,275
|
Stock 911 valve springs are really pretty capable. I ran them on my 2.7 race motor for a while, and I wasn't getting float at 8,000 rpm. The factory used the same springs from the beginning until at least the end of the 3.2 era, even on the high RPM early S motors. So you should be fine.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |