![]() |
Quote:
The major difference is the 904 main shaft, gear ratios and the additional oiling hole in the intermediate plate to lubricate the main shaft bearing. This design feature was transferred to the mid-engine transmissions used in the 914/6 but not the 914 /4 cylinder cars. As you look at the case you will notice that it has extra fins for cooling and structural rigidity. Although it looks similar to the 901 aluminum case, it is in fact sand cast magnesium. There are also additional bosses for mounting the trans into the chassis. Looking at the shift selection fork you'll notice a large bolt in the center. That is an additional detent designed to aid in rapid shift selection. Looking through the hole you might be able to notice that the LSD is tiny. It is haft the diameter of the 901/915 LSD ad half the weight. The output shafts protrude from the differential unlike the production piece. These shafts have an external spline design adapted from the 904. I believe the flanges are identical to the 904. The last major difference is the provision for the shift shaft. As you can see, the shift shaft is accessed under the bell housing. this design is different from either the tail shifter or side shifter of the production models. |
Quote:
This adjustment technique proves that "old habits die hard." :) |
Quote:
|
What was he adjusting with the hammer?
|
Endplay.... ;)
|
Hi Henry,
Do you have a pic of the combustion chambers? Those pistons have a huge dome. Whats the compression? Thanks John |
Cam Chains
Henery
It appears thgat you are using aluminum chain wheels. The 1973, and later RSR also uses those aluminum wheels. The RSR parts book shows an unusual Porsche part number for the RSR chains. Different from a normal split chain, or non split chain. Do you know why the RSR has a different chain number? Do you use anything special chain wise for the aluminum wheels in your engines, Mike Curnow |
Quote:
|
Second answer
James
Apparently you like to answer other peoples questions, INTERNET expert I guess. This is the second question I asked that you have answered, incorrectly. If you insist on doing this, read the question. What is unique about the 1973 , 74, 75 cam chain? Part # 901 105 529 02, that part number is not the solid or split chain part number. I thought it may have something to do with the aluminum chain wheels since they are the only real unique pieces in the RSR valve train. Anyone have any facts, and not opinions? Quote:
|
Quote:
|
sorry
Quote:
Sorry, I thought you were answering my question to Henry. Mike |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The heads are basically the same as a 69 chamber with 12mm plug holes. The compression was measured @ 10.8:1. |
Quote:
993-105-529-00/255 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1342569773.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1342569788.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1342569802.jpg The crank was made from a std/std 2.2 911 "S" crank. It can be replicated for around $1.2K if you supply the crank. |
Quote:
Magnesium protection |
I really hope that some day I've got a good excuse to have Henry build an engine for me...
|
Matt - you will NOT be disappointed!
Hope you don't mind, Henry - it was a great experience (and mine was just a lowly T). http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1342647567.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1342647585.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1342647600.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1342647611.jpg |
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website