![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 843
|
Crankshaft - Rod Journal diameter and width: 2.4/2.7 vs SC
While I understand why Porsche had to reduce the rod journal diameter from 57mm to 52mm to achieve the 70.4mm stroke (otherwise wouldn't be possible) for 2.4 models but why did they also widen the journal width from 22mm to 24mm (thinning the webs from 7mm to 6mm in the process), and then go back to 22mm width and 7mm webs again in 1978?
Can 66mm cranks be machined to 70.4mm stroke with SC spec rod journals? If so, why didn't the factory racing department do this when they experienced vibration problems with the 2.5ST long-stroke and the 2.8RSR? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 843
|
EDIT!!!!
Sorry, I had got the specs from Wayne's book and there's a mistake there. The SC rod journals are not 52mm dia x 22mm width. Here is the correct version: Diameter of SC journals: 53mm SC rod width at big-end: 22.6mm So, the thickness of SC webs are about half-way between the 66mm and 2.4/2.7 cranks. If I'm calculating right, the 66mm crank CANNOT be machined to SC rod journal spec, because it is short of shaft material by 0.2mm. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca.
Posts: 2,418
|
SC rod journal width is 22mm. The 66mm rod journal can be ground down to diameter and width of the 3.0 liter journal. We do it all the time.
__________________
Aaron. ![]() Burnham Performance https://www.instagram.com/burnhamperformance/ |
||
![]() |
|
Try not, Do or Do not
|
Quote:
Previously we needed a custom rod to suit this conversion.
__________________
Henry Schmidt SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE Ph: 760-728-3062 Email: supertec1@earthlink.net |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 843
|
Thanks.
From Frere's book: Quote:
If the GT3 rod journal is 21.8 width x 53mm dia, then the surface bearing area is smaller than all its predecessors (2.0 to 3.2 Carrera). Why's that? Last edited by blue72s; 12-26-2013 at 11:52 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca.
Posts: 2,418
|
The GT3 rod big end width is 21.9mm
The SC rod big end width is 21.8 The SC journal width is 22mm The 2.0 liter journal width is 22.1mm The journal diameter of 53mm came about around the 936/956 engines. The width was settled with the 9 bolt 935 engines/ 911SC 3 liter Porsche used this dimension on all the competition cars...935,962,GT1,GT3.
__________________
Aaron. ![]() Burnham Performance https://www.instagram.com/burnhamperformance/ Last edited by BURN-BROS; 12-27-2013 at 08:53 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 843
|
3.3 Turbo
![]() 3.0 SC ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca.
Posts: 2,418
|
It's a typo. All the measurements I gave you came from actual parts in the shop.....
![]()
__________________
Aaron. ![]() Burnham Performance https://www.instagram.com/burnhamperformance/ Last edited by BURN-BROS; 12-27-2013 at 02:26 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 843
|
Thanks for the clarification.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 843
|
What is the radius of the fillets on the GT3 rod journals? (So, I'd know what is the maximum stroke length can be achieved with the 66mm crank)
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca.
Posts: 2,418
|
I do not know that dim.
All you will be able to get is a 2mm offset grind...maybe. So 4mm of additional stroke max would be the result. 69mm stroke may be all you could do conservatively. Your crank grinder would have to tell you what he would be comfortable doing.
__________________
Aaron. ![]() Burnham Performance https://www.instagram.com/burnhamperformance/ |
||
![]() |
|