![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Checking flywheel balance?
Anyone checked an early 911 flywheel for balance?,as its going on a 2.2 and was wondering if it might be a good move considering the non-counterweighted crank?
Have followed a lot of engine builds on here and not noticed it being standard practice ,my flywheel isn't worn by the way. Would consider doing the pressure plate also,thanks
__________________
1985 944 2.7 motor,1989 VW Corrado 16v,57 project plastic speedster t4 power,1992 mk3 Golf,2005 a4 b7 qt avant 3.0 tdi,1987 mk2 Golf GTI,1973 914,2.2t to go in. Past cars, 17 aircooled VW's and lots of BMW's KP 13/3/1959-21/11/2014 RIP my best friend. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Normally a front pulley/crank/equivilent rod weight/flywheel/pressure plate/clutch disk are balanced together.
In some cases...where the flywheel is simetrical (not off set weighting) you can balance it separately. Horizontally opposed cranks are inherently IN balance separately...but...depending on how anal you are...best to do the whole assembly at once. It also depends on the RPM expected. A 1 gram imbalance might not be too bad at 5000RPM...but the same 1 gram at 9000RPM could shake an engine apart. It all costs money...and you have to weigh those costs against the overall price of doing the engine...and how long you expect it to last.
__________________
Bob Hutson |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Quote:
In the long run, it's recommended to zero balance these external parts separately from the internal rotating parts. Maintaining Your Balance: Engine Building Tips to Reduce NVH and Increase Life - Engine Builder Magazine Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
1985 944 2.7 motor,1989 VW Corrado 16v,57 project plastic speedster t4 power,1992 mk3 Golf,2005 a4 b7 qt avant 3.0 tdi,1987 mk2 Golf GTI,1973 914,2.2t to go in. Past cars, 17 aircooled VW's and lots of BMW's KP 13/3/1959-21/11/2014 RIP my best friend. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 7,275
|
I'm with Sherwood, but I am pretty sure that flywheels come zero balanced to start with on regular Porsche motors, and from everyone else who makes them. Same with pressure plates.
So no need to balance the two together. Both of these parts usually have shallow drilling holes, which I take to be how the manufacturer got them balanced. If you are building a cost is no object race motor, and plan to have it apart frequently, maybe balancing assemblies makes sense. You say this is going on a 2.2. Are you using the 911 transmission? The 2.0 flywheels have the starter ring gear cut into them, and won't work with any transmission other than the 901 (or so I think - smaller clutch disk, and maybe different mainshaft spline count?). The 2.2 and later flywheels have the ring gear as a separate part, and it should also be zero balanced. Though if you have anything balanced, makes some sense (maybe lower cost at the balancing shop?) to balance flywheel, ring gear, and PP as a unit, and have all three parts punch marked and red painted as to how they are to go together. And if this is strictly a street motor, this may not matter too much. And it isn't coming apart, so you can't do anything about the balance of the internal engine parts. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Haven't checked with my balance guy as it depends on what mandrels he has to do the job ,his specialty/experience will be a good recommendation also,have worked with him for 20yrs off and on...trust him.
__________________
1985 944 2.7 motor,1989 VW Corrado 16v,57 project plastic speedster t4 power,1992 mk3 Golf,2005 a4 b7 qt avant 3.0 tdi,1987 mk2 Golf GTI,1973 914,2.2t to go in. Past cars, 17 aircooled VW's and lots of BMW's KP 13/3/1959-21/11/2014 RIP my best friend. Last edited by porschetub; 07-21-2014 at 10:53 PM.. Reason: spelling |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |