![]() |
|
|
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,117
|
'Splain me why I need to resurface rockers for new cams?
Only reason that made sense to me is, is the rough surface traps oil to prevent galling during wear in.
Is there something I'm missing? TIA |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 13,843
|
New cam and old rockers= different hardness. You want them close to same hardness so one doesn't prematurely wear the other out.
|
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,117
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Metal to metal contact parts develop a wear pattern over time. If you use a new part with an old part, the old part will cause abnormal wear on the new part, or vice versa. Two new parts, if broken in properly, will wear together and develop a "matched" wear pattern.
__________________
'80 RoW 911 SC non-sunroof coupe in Guards Red It's not a Carrera.... It's a Super Carrera! |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,117
|
Ah yes, that makes sense.
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,117
|
Ok, we can close this thread. My dumb question was answered.
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Not a dumb question at all. Your question may have saved someone from premature cam or rocker arm wear/failure.
__________________
'80 RoW 911 SC non-sunroof coupe in Guards Red It's not a Carrera.... It's a Super Carrera! |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,117
|
Quote:
Begs me to question though, say a machine shop does the resurfacing, but their equipment isnt true. Might have been better without resurfacing? Just a wild guess... |
||
![]() |
|
abides.
|
Yes. There are a few threads on here showing rockers that were not resurfaced straight, so only one side contacted the cam.
__________________
Graham 1984 Carrera Targa |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,117
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,653
|
This is why you need to keep track of where the rockers are when rebuilding if you plan to reuse them with the cams. The wear pattern is unique to each individual rocker/cam surface.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,062
|
+1 on replacing rocker arms in the original places ahem reusing cam shafts. It isn't unusual for the rockers and cams to wear unevenly. If you put a rocker arm that has worn with an unusual wear pattern and put it against a re-ground or new cam, the uneven wear pattern of the rocker arm can damage the new cam before it's even broken in. Yes, we have read about poor rocker arm regrinds damaging new cams. But, just because there are some shops that have done bad rocker arm regrinds doesn't mean it's a good idea to install old untouched rocker arms with a new cam.
__________________
1990 964 Coupe 1986 Carrera 3.2 Targa |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Air Medal or two
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cross roads
Posts: 14,076
|
I went against the grain of thought as I usually do -
I installed a new reground cam. The old rockers - I broke out the Dremel and polishing sauce. A couple few hours later of my time they were all mirror polished on the working surfaces. I am not advocating anyone do it this way, but I do not see what other magic could be involved at some other shop. I sold the car with 50 K on the rebuild, never a problem with it.
__________________
D troop 3/5 Air Cav,( Bastard CAV) and 162 Assult Helicopter Co- (Vultures) South of Saigon, U Minh Forest, Delta, and all parts in between |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,117
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Air Medal or two
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cross roads
Posts: 14,076
|
All I know everyone poo-pooed me at the time.
It worked because the engine did not ever develop an ever expanding valve lash adjustment problem. This would be indicative of a cam lobe / lifter, rocker was wearing away . If I ever did another engine I would do it again.
__________________
D troop 3/5 Air Cav,( Bastard CAV) and 162 Assult Helicopter Co- (Vultures) South of Saigon, U Minh Forest, Delta, and all parts in between |
||
![]() |
|
Air Medal or two
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cross roads
Posts: 14,076
|
When thinking about it , - each engine has a little different cam to rocker foot angle.
Even if you install new cams this angle will stay the same. it would seem like there is no better choice but to make sure the rocker goes back where it came from as it has a proper angle wore to the foot. Now if polished up all pretty, it has to be a good fit and contact. JMO
__________________
D troop 3/5 Air Cav,( Bastard CAV) and 162 Assult Helicopter Co- (Vultures) South of Saigon, U Minh Forest, Delta, and all parts in between |
||
![]() |
|