Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
smokintr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,010
Send a message via AIM to smokintr6
How common is 964 piston slap and how much of a concern

I resealed a used 964 engine that I bought from a less than honest person, so I can't claim to have much history on it. The pistons and cylinders visually looked brand new, but I had them measured by a machine shop (I gave them the specs from the factory manual), and they were declared to be fine. Now that the engine is completed I get a noise that starts about 30 seconds after initial start. It sounds like a "bad lifter" in a car with traditional lifters, but i have traced it to the number 6 cylinder, and its coming from the barrel, not the head area. once the car is fully warmed up the noise is 99% gone. The power is good, engine runs flawlessly, and there is no smoke. Is this a common thing for a 964 engine with miles on it? Is my machine shop just bad at their job? Ideally I would like to be able to put 10 to 15k miles on it and then build it into a 3.8.... My guess is I should be able to get that kind of mileage with a little slap during warm up, but I wanted to see what others have experienced.

Old 06-06-2017, 05:35 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Member 911 Anonymous
 
DRACO A5OG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes
Posts: 14,329
Garage
Send a message via Skype™ to DRACO A5OG
What were the measurements?

Within middle of Spec is fine but if close to the wear limit then yeah, it will work but you will probably get slap. This is what Ollie's Machine Shop "declared" on mine. That is why I chose to get new P&C's ( well to be clear, my old cylinders bored out for the new larger CP pistons for my 3.4L build ) No, they did not do the boring & plating, EBS did mine.

Post a sound clip or video to confirm. Others with heck of allot more experience may reply.
__________________
'85 Carrera Targa
Factory Marble Grey/Black * Turbo Tail * 930 Steering Wheel* Sport Seats * 17" Fuchs (r) * 3.4 * 964 Cams * 915 * LSD * Factory SS * Turbo Tie Rods * Bilsteins * Euro Pre-Muff * SW Chip on 4K DME * NGK * Sienes GSK * Targa Body Brace
PCA/POC

Last edited by DRACO A5OG; 06-06-2017 at 06:24 AM..
Old 06-06-2017, 06:22 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
E-85 sippin drunk
 
turbobrat930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 1,554
Just a ?, but have you rechecked the head stud torque on that cyl? Sounds to me like the cylinder is moving ever so slightly, and hitting either the case spigot, or the head. Is the correct base shim or gasket under the cylinder in the spigot?
__________________
Brad...930 gt-1 racecar, increased displacement to 3.6L, JB racing Cylinders, JE 8 to1 pistons, stroked crank, Carrillo rods, extrudehoned 3.2L intake, full bay Bell I/C, GT-2 EVO cams, Rarly8 headers, GTX-3584RS turbo, twin plug, P&P heads, Link G4 EFi system, G-50/50 with LTD slip and oil squirters/oil cooler, zork tube, full race coilover system, with carbon fiber body, full cage, E-85 sippin drunk
Old 06-06-2017, 06:32 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
smokintr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,010
Send a message via AIM to smokintr6
im 99.99% sure its the piston. using the stethoscope the case is silent as is the head, only the barrel of the cylinder makes noise. I did check the torque, as well as recheck all the valve lash clearances. I also started the engine with that valve cover off to make sure the cam spray bars were clear, and there was plenty of oil up top. noise is only audible at idle when warming up.

Cylinder 4 is also borderline noisy with the stethoscope... but the 1-3 bank is quiet. Do these pistons have the offset pin that would be more inclined to slap on one side of the engine?

I don't have the measurements with me now, I may still have them at home.
Old 06-06-2017, 08:22 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 127
Yes, the piston pin bore is off centre by 0.9mm. It's vital that pistons are correctly oriented with the stamped 'E' on the intake side
Old 06-13-2017, 11:21 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nash County, NC.
Posts: 8,487
Worn rockers sounds like piston slap.
The piston offset really seems possible.
Bruce
Old 06-14-2017, 03:20 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
smokintr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,010
Send a message via AIM to smokintr6
Bruce,
I definitely thought it was a rocker until I isolated the sound to just the cylinder.
Old 06-15-2017, 05:13 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered
 
txhokie4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 703
Garage
The race engine I am building complained of piston slap when I bought the car form the PO.
The engine was in 4 rubbermaid tubs -- so I don't know what it sounded like.

The jugs were Mahle, and the pistons Ross -- The pistons had obvious scuffing on the skirts, the cylinders looked fine, but had ovality issues when mic'd. The clearances for the combination were
on the high side.

I suspected the thin wall of the slip-In 3.8's and the mismatch of aluminum alloy types was contributing.

I had the jugs refurbished and tossed the Ross pistons in favor of Mahle RSR 3.8's to match the alloy type.

I'm in the process of reassembly this summer. We'll see if the piston slap goes away.

Mike
__________________
2015 Panamera Hybrid, 2008 Cayenne Twin Turbo
2001 996 GT2
1999 Spec Boxster, 1996 993 Cabriolet
1992 964 Cabirolet, 1975 911 RSR Replica Race Car
Old 06-15-2017, 06:33 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Try not, Do or Do not
 
Henry Schmidt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fallbrook, Ca. 92028
Posts: 14,055
Garage
I have no real opinion about the noise you're experiencing but the design of the 3.6 (100mm) piston is prone to piston slap. (very short skirt)
In an attempt to control this phenomenon, Mahle tapered the bore of the 3.6 production car cylinder.
They have a smaller bore at the top of the cylinder than at the base.
When new, the piston will not travel through the cylinder without binding.
This is an interesting solution to a complex challenge.
__________________
Henry Schmidt
SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE
Ph: 760-728-3062
Email: supertec1@earthlink.net
Old 06-15-2017, 08:01 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
smokintr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,010
Send a message via AIM to smokintr6
Henry,
If we were to (however dangerously) assume that I am right, and it is a piston slap noise... Do you think it will stay together for a few thousand miles, or does it need to come right back down? basically I just don't want to end up with a hole in the case
Old 06-15-2017, 09:06 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Chain fence eating turbo
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Schmidt View Post
I have no real opinion about the noise you're experiencing but the design of the 3.6 (100mm) piston is prone to piston slap. (very short skirt)
In an attempt to control this phenomenon, Mahle tapered the bore of the 3.6 production car cylinder.
They have a smaller bore at the top of the cylinder than at the base.
When new, the piston will not travel through the cylinder without binding.
This is an interesting solution to a complex challenge.
When I learned about aircraft recips, we were told the taper bore was to allow parallel cylinder walls at operating temps as the top of the barrel would expand more than the bottom obviously due to the combustion occurring near the top.
Old 06-15-2017, 11:25 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Try not, Do or Do not
 
Henry Schmidt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fallbrook, Ca. 92028
Posts: 14,055
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tippy View Post
When I learned about aircraft recips, we were told the taper bore was to allow parallel cylinder walls at operating temps as the top of the barrel would expand more than the bottom obviously due to the combustion occurring near the top.
You could be right but I believe the differing cylinder expansion from top to bottom is controlled by the cooling fin lengths. It wasn't until the short skirts employed by the 3.6 (100mm) pistons that Mahle decided to taper the bore in production cylinders.
I know that the use of a very short skirt created a rattle in the RUFF 98 mm pistons and Porsche wasn't interested in warranty issues associated with engine noises in production units.

__________________
Henry Schmidt
SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE
Ph: 760-728-3062
Email: supertec1@earthlink.net
Old 06-16-2017, 07:30 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.