![]() |
|
|
|
It'll be legen-waitforit
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 6,975
|
Tesla powered 912
Now we’re getting somewhere, with Intermeccanica doing EV’s, now this:
https://driving.ca/porsche/auto-news/news/tesla-powered-porsche-912-reimagines-classic-motoring
__________________
Bob James 06 Cayman S - Money Penny 18 Macan GTS Gone: 79 911SC, 83 944, 05 Cayenne Turbo, 10 Panamera Turbo |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,510
|
I wonder if it has to be a SWB longnose? Seems to me a '74 912 would be a better candidate.
__________________
"Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have a radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. '73) (I, Paul D. have loved this quote since 1973. It will remain as long as I post here.) |
||
![]() |
|
Control Group
|
no such thing as a '74 912
__________________
She was the kindest person I ever met |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
funny, I read it as 76 912E
Good vid.
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Bandwidth AbUser
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 29,522
|
Dyslexia. ‘67, not ‘76.
Range of 225 km is not terrible for a play car, but 225 miles would obviously be better.
__________________
Jim R. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,510
|
my bad...sorry.
__________________
"Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have a radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. '73) (I, Paul D. have loved this quote since 1973. It will remain as long as I post here.) |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Almost Banned Once
|
Great but I'd miss that sound of an internal combustion engine.
![]()
__________________
- Peter |
||
![]() |
|
Mighty Meatlocker Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: North TexASS
Posts: 18,530
|
|||
![]() |
|
Almost Banned Once
|
"wheezy farting sounds" are great... Just ask my GF
![]()
__________________
- Peter |
||
![]() |
|
Mighty Meatlocker Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: North TexASS
Posts: 18,530
|
Ha ha - nice!
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Now in 993 land ...
|
The nice thing is that they claim it is reversible and it uses a known good base.
The bad thing is that a) it is a very expensive kit b) future kits will be significant cheaper (battery cost decrease) c) future kits will be having higher range (battery density increase) If I read online information correctly, in the last few years energy density doubled. That means in 5 years this kit likely will get you 300 miles range at lower cost. How heavy you think it is? Will it at all be toss-able? Will it need spring upgrades? I recently was at Laguna Seca enjoying a track day. There was a Tesla Model 3 that had obvious suspension and tire work with some big meats. I could not keep up with it in the 993, surprisingly even in turns it was slightly faster ... maybe had slicks (vs. R compounds on the 993.) G |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 18,162
|
Its all out the window. 10 years from now, there will be a 500hp kits on the cheap.
EDIT: Probably sooner. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 9,100
|
Torque????? 4.5K ft. lbs.!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Marv Evans '69 911E |
||
![]() |
|
Almost Banned Once
|
Sure lots of benefits but the converted cars would be significantly heavier than stock so at the very minimum they should have their brakes upgraded.
Probably springs and shocks as well. (I hope the batteries are mounted low down into the chassis) Then imagine, god forbid you had an accident in one of these... A vintage car with significant weight added suddenly coming to an abrupt stop! ![]()
__________________
- Peter |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,513
|
I like this new direction of hot rodding.
Give me a 60s Cadillac with an EV drivetrain please. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Oh yea! A '60s boat with a heavy frame can carry a lot of batteries. A Chevy Impala would even be a good candidate.
__________________
. |
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,831
|
Pickup truck or van for me please.
|
||
![]() |
|
Still here
|
$50k !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
||
![]() |
|
Now in 993 land ...
|
Quote:
Look at E-bikes and E-bike kits. You can get a decent E-bike kit for a couple hundred bucks now. G |
||
![]() |
|
Almost Banned Once
|
Great but you're all forgetting something. EV cars weigh more than a gas guzzler.
Added weight is a big deal. Let's not dismiss it... Burnouts are great but how do they drive?
__________________
- Peter |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|