Interesting find in Fallujah?

[Don 944 LA]

Red,

There you go again making sense !!!!
Havent you been told about that !!!!

Don

[Mule]

Kach, if you & pinkie think that al jezeera is no more biased than Fox you need to get some table cloths for your heads & a couple of fan belts to hold them in place. Then your anti-American rants would sound justified & you could finish them with allah wackbar, like your brothers. As for pinkies stupid statement that no one is interested in disproving the use of non-existent napalm by out soldiers, before you get concerned about a claim, you should determine if the claim has any validity. For instance, Edited for content. -Z-man You can't. But since I don't know you more a less know your mother, only a fool would spend time dis-proving such a claim.

Remember, this is coming from a guy who thinks that since no one can dis-prove ufos, they must be here.

[widebody911]

Originally posted by Mule
Remember, this is coming from a guy who thinks that since no one can dis-prove ufos, they must be here.

Kinda like WMD's?

[kach22i]

Originally posted by Mule
you should determine if the claim has any validity.

It does have validity, because napalm is still around. Both Russia and the USA are way behind in destroying their stocks.

http://www.ceip.org/files/publications/Harigelreport.asp?p

Further more the US government has used some pretty nasty stuff in the past, like in Vietnam.......................here are a few links:

http://www.reformation.org/poison.html

http://www.vietnamese-american.org/b3.html

http://www.wsws.org/news/1998/july1998/cnn2-j24.shtml

http://users.westnet.gr/~cgian/sarin.htm

http://www.gulfwarvets.com/news11.htm

In fact the USA used more chemical weapons in Vietnam than all the nations in all the wars in history.

http://www.vietnamwar.com/PhanThiKimPhuc.htm

NOTE: Like I said before, if it saves one US soldiers life, use all the napalm we still have - just don't tell me it's not a possiblity.

[ErVikingo]

I NEED AN EXPRESSO

[fintstone]

Originally posted by kach22i
I've scanned the thread for some issues, here is what I've found.

1. No one is upset about the possiblity of using napalm, only the possible inaccuracy of such reports.

2. Joeaksa has sex on the brain.

That really makes no sense to me. Why would anyone be upset about the possibility of using napalm when we know that napalm is not being used? Sorta like worrying about the world being flat.

It is much more worrisome that the enemy can put out ridiculous propaganda and have it repeated over an over again by liberal media and web bloggers.

[fintstone]

Originally posted by kach22i
It does have validity, because napalm is still around. Both Russia and the USA are way behind in destroying their stocks.

http://www.ceip.org/files/publications/Harigelreport.asp?p

Further more the US government has used some pretty nasty stuff in the past, like in Vietnam.......................here are a few links:

http://www.reformation.org/poison.html

http://www.vietnamese-american.org/b3.html

http://www.wsws.org/news/1998/july1998/cnn2-j24.shtml

http://users.westnet.gr/~cgian/sarin.htm

http://www.gulfwarvets.com/news11.htm

In fact the USA used more chemical weapons in Vietnam than all the nations in all the wars in history.

http://www.vietnamwar.com/PhanThiKimPhuc.htm

NOTE: Like I said before, if it saves one US soldiers life, use all the napalm we still have - just don't tell me it's not a possiblity.

You should choose your links/proof more carefully. For example, the artlcle by April Oliver and Peter Arnett got them fired at CNN when it was proven untrue (early dan rather..LOL). The rest are no better. Just propaganda. The US did not use chemical weapons (per the common definition) in Vietnam. Napalm and defoliants are not normally considered as such.
Even if the links had been accurate, why does anything that happened in Vietnam have to do with Iraq?