Carter is a Bin Laden whore

[deathpunk dan]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
Besides winning the war (despite being stabbed in the back and hamstrung by the Democrats and media), turning around a recession (despite the Democrats and the media) and making us safer at home...Other than that, ya, "grasping at straws."

in the back, throat, stomach...I'm not picky...

[Mulhollanddose]

Somebody needs a good old fashioned neck wringing.

edit: deathpunkpussies above statement has been amended, it suggested I being "shanked" with a knife.

[Jamie79SC]

I'm not sure who the dumb ass is here, but please refer to .this article from the AP. It appears that Bakr is estranged from Osama

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by Jamie79SC
I'm not sure who the dumb ass is here, but please refer to .this article from the AP. It appears that Bakr is estranged from Osama

The article proves nothing. I am not saying how close Osama was connected, that is not my point. My point is that Carter is dirty with Bin Laden money and Michael Moore is a hypocrite for slandering Bush while pal-ing up with Carter.

Interestingly this follows the pattern of many Bush/war critics...It seems that a great majority of the most vocal or high profile opponents were either connected to Bin Laden, connected to Saddam's oil, or simply want to regain power by slandering Bush.

[mede8er]

Main Entry: ego·cen·tric
Pronunciation: "E-gO-'sen-trik also "e-
Function: adjective
1 : concerned with the individual rather than society
2 : taking the ego as the starting point in philosophy
3 a : limited in outlook or concern to one's own activities or needs b : SELF-CENTERED, SELFISH
- egocentric noun
- ego·cen·tri·cal·ly /-tri-k(&-)lE/ adverb
- ego·cen·tric·i·ty /-"sen-'tri-s&-tE/ noun
- ego·cen·trism /-'sen-"tri-z&m/ noun

[dd74]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose

Interestingly this follows the pattern of many Bush/war critics...It seems that a great majority of the most vocal or high profile opponents were either connected to Bin Laden, connected to Saddam's oil, or simply want to regain power by slandering Bush.

Well...provided how intertwined the U.S. has been with Saudi Arabia in regard to oil, I'd think as many fingers could be pointed at Reps as Dems.

But just to add some spice: during Reagan's time, wasn't that administration supportive of Iraq?

[Rodeo]

Why would anyone even bother engaging Nul on this topic, or on any other topic that can be divided into "us" and "them?" He's going to ignore inconvenient facts, distort those facts he can't ignore, and come to the same conclusion EVERY TIME.

His side is good and right and honest. Yours is bad and wrong and traitorous.

Wouldn't it be more fruitful to go play in traffic?

[dd74]

Originally posted by Rodeo

Wouldn't it be more fruitful to go play in traffic?

Nah. I opt for pounding sand.

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by dd74
Well...provided how intertwined the U.S. has been with Saudi Arabia in regard to oil, I'd think as many fingers could be pointed at Reps as Dems.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't...Why is America relationship with Saudi Arabia relevant?...Lets not play the moral relativism game, Carter got big money from the Bin Laden family and this is unprecedented, excepting Clinton who got big money from Dubai and the Chinese Military.

[dd74]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
Damned if you do, damned if you don't...Why is America relationship with Saudi Arabia relevant?...Lets not play the moral relativism game, Carter got big money from the Bin Laden family and this is unprecedented, excepting Clinton who got big money from Dubai and the Chinese Military.

So what's your point? If Carter received nothing, we wouldn't have had a 9/11 or an ill-founded war?

Hmmm...seems like not only are you grasping at straws, you also picked the shortest one.

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by dd74
So what's your point? If Carter received nothing, we wouldn't have had a 9/11 or an ill-founded war?

You mean "well-founded" war...From humanitarian reasons (think Serbia only greater), violations of UN resolutions, WMD and connections to al qaeda...Well-founded and brilliantly executed, in fact only in a fantasy world could it have gone better.

Carter may have helped create modern day Iran. I doubt he had an effect on 9-11 (unless you could somehow link the rise of the Ayatollah to modern terrorism, which you can I suppose).

[Rodeo]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
You mean "well-founded" war ... Well-founded and brilliantly executed, in fact only in a fantasy world could it have gone better.

You finally spoke to something you are expert on .. fantasy worlds

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by Rodeo
You finally spoke to something you are expert on .. fantasy worlds

Really?...Through a historical survey one could only conclude that Iraq and the war-on-terror have been brilliant...The fantasy world is a figment of the hate-filled Democrat party and other scumsucking socialists world wide. They [Democrats and the biased MSM] desperately desire our failure and they are doing all they can, from at least a propaganda standpoint, to destroy our efforts in Iraq and the ME...I wouldn't be surprised if Democrats or their friends weren't over in Iraq directing the terrorists and running their media campaign.

[deathpunk dan]

You nutty nutball! You say 'our' like you have had a f#cking thing to do with ANYTHING but spout your retarded drivel and get OWNED on -of all places in 'cyberspace' - a PORSCHE message board.

What a joke.

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by deathpunk dan
You nutty nutball! You say 'our' like you have had a f#cking thing to do with ANYTHING but spout your retarded drivel and get OWNED on -of all places in 'cyberspace' - a PORSCHE message board.

What a joke.

I have punks like you in my stool.

[nostatic]

Originally posted by widebody911
So I guess proof of connections between the President and the perpetrators of 9/11 is no big deal...

you mean the CIA?

[dd74]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
You mean "well-founded" war...From humanitarian reasons (think Serbia only greater), violations of UN resolutions, WMD and connections to al qaeda...Well-founded and brilliantly executed, in fact only in a fantasy world could it have gone better.

Carter may have helped create modern day Iran. I doubt he had an effect on 9-11 (unless you could somehow link the rise of the Ayatollah to modern terrorism, which you can I suppose).

1st graph: two days ago, how many Iraqis die in random bombings? What CBS journalist was nearly killed? Why have 1500 more soldiers called into supress a by-late uprising (Basra, I think)?

2nd grap: I actually agree with you here.

[dd74]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
I have punks like you in my stool.

You better eat more bran.

[kang]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
You mean "well-founded" war...From humanitarian reasons (think Serbia only greater), violations of UN resolutions, WMD and connections to al qaeda...Well-founded and brilliantly executed, in fact only in a fantasy world could it have gone better.

Carter may have helped create modern day Iran. I doubt he had an effect on 9-11 (unless you could somehow link the rise of the Ayatollah to modern terrorism, which you can I suppose).

Well founded? It was founded on the existence of WMD's, which never existed. How is that well founded? It was in Bush's fantasy world that these WMD's existed.

[kang]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
I have punks like you in my stool.

Yet another statement demonstrating Mulhollandose’s maturity level.