|
|
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Licensed User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ....down Highway 61
Posts: 6,505
|
Id keep the Colt slide because I like to have the horsey on the side. If you dont like '80 series parts, throw them out. Not a big deal. The MKIV round top Colt slide is a much better looking slide than the springfield and you still have the option of having it milled for any site you want later on.
the springfield frame is not mil. spec. Its contoured differently than a mil spec 1911, but it has plenty of material for checkering, serrations, etc. Last edited by Shuie; 09-09-2006 at 06:36 PM.. |
||
09-09-2006, 06:30 PM
|
|
|
A Man of Wealth and Taste
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Out there somewhere beyond the doors of perception
Posts: 51,063
|
Quote:
__________________
Copyright "Some Observer" |
||
|
09-09-2006, 07:54 PM
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: N. Phoenix AZ USA
Posts: 28,943
|
Good thread and Jordi has forgotten more than I know about 1911's.
Next UPM in Vegas we need to go to the shooting range! Joe A
__________________
2013 Jag XF, 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins (the workhorse), 1992 Jaguar XJ S-3 V-12 VDP (one of only 100 examples made), 1969 Jaguar XJ (been in the family since new), 1985 911 Targa backdated to 1973 RS specs with a 3.6 shoehorned in the back, 1959 Austin Healey Sprite (former SCCA H-Prod), 1995 BMW R1100RSL, 1971 & '72 BMW R75/5 "Toaster," Ural Tourist w/sidecar, 1949 Aeronca Sedan / QB |
||
|
09-10-2006, 09:28 AM
|
|
