![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
JP ducks theism vs. a-theism debate. Petard hoisting afoot.
Z-Man started an excellent thread in which the perils of homosexual gatherings were actively debated. That thread soon segued into a discussion of the religious premise relating to homosexuality and thereupon JP weighed in. In his usual convincing, compelling and entertaining style, JP “went off” like a rabid badger on all who approached the subject – taking no prisoners in the process.
Along comes PB, sensing an opportunity to draw JP into a theistic debate. In case you missed it, here’s a synopsis of the play-by-play that ensued: (1) PB snags a couple of JP’s remarks and takes them on tangents, jabbing and poking at JP. His rapier is somewhat dull and he draws no blood. (2) JP hints at enthusiasm in his response, but by the end of it he simply deflects PB’s advances with defensive blows and parry. (3) PB senses weakness (or a lack of interest) in JP and tries to up the ante with his next posting. Some so-so sword play, but again, any wounds are merely superficial. (4) JP demurs, throws down his weapons in boredom or defeat. No response to PB’s advance. (5) PB now senses the futility of the gambit, but makes a final thrust – perhaps simply out of the momentum of the moment. However, in a delightful display of footwork, he manages to nab JP’s discarded petard and to begin to hoist him over it. He does so with this gem: Quote:
Quote:
And there JP sits. Wiggling still, I suppose. Come on JP – don’t let it end like this, it’s just getting good. We wanna make some popcorn.
__________________
the odd Porsche here and there |
||
![]() |
|
Dog-faced pony soldier
|
![]()
__________________
A car, a 911, a motorbike and a few surfboards Black Cars Matter |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I thought PB's post was excellent. I'm not so sure about vampires existing, though. Might not be cool.
__________________
Mike 1976 Euro 911 3.2 w/10.3 compression & SSIs 22/29 torsions, 22/22 adjustable sways, Carrera brakes |
||
![]() |
|
Super Jenius
|
Thanks for the headlines, but I got bored. I say what I have to and move on; usually hoping to catch a good photo on the random pictures thread before Z-man gets to it.
Having been both an Engineering scholar and a Jesuit student, I've been 'round this carousel with highly self-regarded engineers who disdain anyone with faith. Their failure is usually one of imagination and a refusal, having been conditioned exclusively to cause-effect and mathematical proof to understand and receive the adulation of their peers, to acknowledge that there can be something beyond those cold, comfortable certainties. As I said a few times in that thread, a person (including myself) can do/believe more-or-less what they want, and I'm OK with it. It's the person (including, potentially, myself) who tries to proselytize, to convince others so vehemently of his own absolute rectitude that's the boor, the annoyance, the "just STFU already" person with whom I take exception. I've said my piece and don't want to become that guy. My faith is mine, and no amount (or, more accurately, volume) of "reasoning" from Purry (whose acumen I've questioned in the past) is going to dispossess me of what I've forged through relationships with a spectrum of good friends and mentors, from genius scientists and engineers, to devout Jesuits. If he can't understand (or, more to my point, accept) what appears to him to be a paradox between faith and reason ... a "paradox" with which I and many people much smarter than myself, throughout history have had no indigestion ... that's his failure, and it's not my onus to cure him of that schizophrenia. More to the point, never try to teach a Purry to sing... it wastes your time and annoys the Purry. Sure, I think there's a God, but most of the fascination I had with the study of religion was the sociology and psychology behind the actions of individuals and groups of people trying to comprehend and relate with things at the edge of their comprehension. The funny part, to me, is being regarded as a "religious" person (and a "joiner"? wow, if that's not off-base. Anyone hereon who knows me, feel free to testify to how good a "joiner" I am). Then again, I have my limits and I have my blind spots. I don't see the wit evident to you in Purry's response, for example. I see the m/o that bores me -- excerpting one or two non-essential things from the continuum of an argument and contriving what could loosely be called a response to this strawman he creates. Which makes impossible a focused discussion of particular issues, over the course of a series of posts/responses. Whereas Supe (for example) and I have been able to sustain debate over days' worth of posts, Purry's approach (to be as polite as possible) and mine are immiscible. But, again, thanks for the props. It's nice to be appreciated, even if simultaneously misunderstood. Hmmm... this must be how God feels. ![]() Best, JP
__________________
2003 SuperCharged Frontier ../.. 1979 930 ../.. 1989 BMW 325iX ../.. 1988 BMW M5 ../.. 1973 BMW 2002 ../..1969 Alfa Boattail Spyder ../.. 1961 Morris Mini Cooper ../..2002 Aprilia RSV Mille ../.. 1985 Moto Guzzi LMIII cafe ../.. 2005 Kawasaki Brute Force 750 Last edited by Overpaid Slacker; 02-23-2007 at 06:11 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
(the shotguns)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 21,703
|
I enjoyed the thread. Thought provoking and some good points.
__________________
***************************************** Well i had #6 adjusted perfectly but then just before i tightened it a butterfly in Zimbabwe farted and now i have to start all over again! I believe we all make mistakes but I will not validate your poor choices and/or perversions and subsidize the results your actions. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Personally, I thought Purry's response was great. ![]()
__________________
1987 325 eta |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
least common denominator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Pedro,CA
Posts: 22,506
|
I don't always agree JP however I think he had an excellent response.
I find it interesting the atheist are just as "religious" about forcing their lack of belief on everyone as the very theist they claim to abhorrer.
__________________
Gary Fisher 29er 2019 Kia Stinger 2.0t gone ![]() 1995 Miata Sold 1984 944 Sold ![]() I am not lost for I know where I am, however where I am is lost. - Winnie the poo. |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,167
|
Spot on scottmandue
Quote:
Joe- I have yet to see JP stumped for a response. Seems he disappears when Bored with the opposing. But good work, Joe, on drawing out JP with a new thread . .. like yelling " mmmMOMm .JP IS DIS"N PURRY
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2˘ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Perhaps JP is performing a social experiment on us?
__________________
1987 325 eta |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Higgs Field
Posts: 22,644
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Jeff '72 911T 3.0 MFI '93 Ducati 900 Super Sport "God invented whiskey so the Irish wouldn't rule the world" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
'tis he looking for the virtuous good fight. Read the play-by-play up top... ![]()
__________________
the odd Porsche here and there |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
What you don't know is this: Purrybonker is left-handed.
__________________
1987 325 eta |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Cars & Coffee Killer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: State of Failure
Posts: 32,246
|
Quote:
I have a coworker in this camp. He simply can't comprehend how anyone could think he is wrong, much less that he is doing exactly what he criticizes. He freaks out if someone is wearing a cross necklace. (They are obviously "pushing their religion" on him.) These people seem to be singularly fixated on Christianity. He doesn't seem to mind the little Vishnu statues and whatnot some Indians have at their desk...
__________________
Some Porsches long ago...then a wankle... 5 liters of VVT fury now -Chris "There is freedom in risk, just as there is oppression in security." |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vancouver or... ?
Posts: 1,025
|
Quote:
At a dinner party celebrating Chinese New Year, I sat beside a teacher who had spent some years in Indonesia doing charity work for a Christian based organization. During her time there she learned about many of the local religious beliefs, things like a religion that involved bat-like creatures (real people who became bats at night I think) that caused mischief in their most benign activities and death and suffering in extreme cases. This particular “tribe” were all believers in this phenomena and many had even seen these bats zooming around in quasi-spirit form. My date – a very devout catholic observed how it must have been very difficult for her (the teacher) to try to cut through that kind of “backward thinking” and the Baptist pastor sitting beside her chimed in with similar observations. I thought, Ahem. Virgin birth – dead people back to life, etc. etc. Hm, Jews skeptically viewing Christians questioning jealous, wrathful Old Testament Jewish God, while they sneer at the modern, convenient Mormon interpretation of loving New Testament God, while they are laughing at and pitying the indigenous for their absurd ritualistic beliefs, all the while everyone asserting vision and imagination and spirituality. Imagination and spirituality that only apply as far as such was implanted in all of us by parents, preachers or teachers at an impressionable age. (The Jesuits say "give them to us until 7, we'll have them as men") Now that sounds like a real paradox. I suppose that there really is no paradox between science and faith except for that seen by the faithful. I held my tongue until the drive home. We no longer “date”. The relationship was great otherwise. Yeah, religion/faith – that good force that might just actually be the greatest dividing influence on the planet. (Did I say "might"? No - that's way too easy, just open a newspaper and pick a story, any story involving war or hatred) Yep, sounds like the real paradox. We are all atheistic, really. It's just a matter of scale. Many have picked one God and have eliminated all the rest. Capital A atheists have just eliminated one, or slightly more Gods than the rest. We all don’t believe in far, far more Gods than we actually do believe in. Thanks Joe, wludaivd, island911, scottmandue, berretafan and for the indulgence JP. |
||
![]() |
|
Super Jenius
|
Ok. Hold on, everybody. Let me get all meta-threadical on you, and then I'll leave this to y'all to work out.
I don't think Purry is stupid. At all. I think his intelligence is undiscliplined, which, as a disciple of hard sciences, he'll probably take as an insult, but allow me to explain. Whether you find Purry's exigeses entertaining or not, I do not find them to be "responses" in the sense that they're only tangentally "responsive" to what has been said. Usually (and this is over the course of a coupla' years now) rather than respond to the thrust of a post, he'll pick one or two obiter dicta from a post and go off on a world-according-to-Purry tangent. Often, it's a "gotcha" type "look at the inconsistency" banality. Yawn. If you want to be entertained, I'll stipulate there's some value and, often, humor in that. However, if you're trying to carry on a dialog, it amounts to his, consciously or subconsciously, acknowledging that he cannot reply to the argument you're making, so he re-characterizes or just plain invents your argument for you in a meme convenient to him, and "responds" to that. Hence, the strawman reference. The novelty of such an approach, from the receiving end, does not last long. So, I get bored, and I'm not going to make anybody's case other than my own. EDIT -- and to be clear, I'm not trying to convince him, or anybody, that there is a God. Most of Purry's thrust has been about how other, smart, people don't believe (more on that below) and therefore either (1) if I'm smart I shouldn't, or (2) because I do believe God exists, I'm dumb. Not exactly a foundation for a compelling dialog. He and I are going to disagree on this, and I don't need to keep fixing his mischaracterizations and questioning his hyperbole. I believe in his first post he started with this little gem: Most "intellectuals", and certainly almost the totality of the scientific community (including those geniuses who might fall somewhat short of a passing grade in their spelling ability) takes exception to the very existence of God,..." Having studied some history, and knowing quite a few scientists and other intellectuals, I expressed my skepticism and asked where he got that data from. His response: " ". Essentially, ignore being called on ridiculous hyperbole, used as the cornerstone of a position and move on. If you think that's a great approach, I'm not going to be giving you voice lessons either. ![]() I hadn't read Purry's ... response ... until this thread was started; and, frankly, a reply seems superfluous. There's no "there" there. I can't tell if he's requiring dogma (can't "slice and dice" religions and choose your own a la carte) or railing against it. Could it be entertaining? Sure, I suppose. Some people like Carrottop and Bob Saget. The one piece of interest (to me) is another unsubstantiated position using the gravitas of others' opinions: IQ vs. belief in God. Then again, the rate of athiesm may in fact increase in proportion to IQ. If so, evidently we're to infer, as Purry does, that "smart" people know God doesn't (or is it can't) exist. Personally, I don't buy into IQ as being terribly informative, and I don't believe athiesm is sophisticated. I think it's a dodge. The rate of high-functioning mental disorders may increase in proportion to IQ as well (I have as much proof at hand for that as Purry put forth for his own, but it is fun just to make ***** up as you go along, so I can understand the temptation). So, what would you infer from such a circumstance? That athiests are mental? You can be wicked smart and wicked freaking unstable... and history is replete with examples of that. Finally (and I do mean finally) I thought that Jeff, Z and the others with whom I was discussing matters had come to a point where we understood and appreciated each others' views; and frequently that's about as much as you can possibly expect. There can be no such point with Purry, IMHO, b/c it's substance and style on which we clash. I'm probably even in the bottom decile of "religiousness" of people on this board anyhoo, and I don't enjoy having to answer (atone?) for all of their supposed mendacities, tenacities and beliefs. It's like putting me in a position to argue anything positive about Notre Dame. My heart's just not in it. "At least it's not any larger" is about the most positive thing I could say about it. As always, best. JP out.
__________________
2003 SuperCharged Frontier ../.. 1979 930 ../.. 1989 BMW 325iX ../.. 1988 BMW M5 ../.. 1973 BMW 2002 ../..1969 Alfa Boattail Spyder ../.. 1961 Morris Mini Cooper ../..2002 Aprilia RSV Mille ../.. 1985 Moto Guzzi LMIII cafe ../.. 2005 Kawasaki Brute Force 750 Last edited by Overpaid Slacker; 02-23-2007 at 08:41 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Seems to me that this place would be pretty boring without tangential "gotcha" arguments. But, whatever... JP's clearly gonna stay completely clear of the subject . Fair enough. I'm gonna turn off the popcorn machine now. But geez JP, even when you've got nothin' to say, you're still darned entertaining to read! Fine. TKO to PB.
__________________
the odd Porsche here and there Last edited by joeclarke; 02-23-2007 at 08:53 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 7,259
|
I got JP on points but twas a very entertaining match. I lean more towards agnostic in my own beliefs.
I do believe that those who spout off about tolerance are often the most intorlerant. Homo's and Christians don't really matter much to me until they try to force me to accept thier views. If your gay, be gay. If you are a FSM believer, rock on. Just don't expect me to participate.
__________________
the unexamined life is not worth living, unless you are reading posts by goofballs-Socrates 88 coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Higgs Field
Posts: 22,644
|
Quote:
Quote:
That's where he begins to remind me of Vinzinni; far too impressed with his own intellectual prowess; ready to comment with authority on that which he so very obviously has not a clue. Dismissing those who would dare dissagree as his intellectual inferiors; and clouding his arguments with the sheer weight of his verbose, divergent ramblings. I'm sorry, but an eloquently expressed banal thought is still a banal thought. He brings nothing new to the argument other than his childesh barbs at the intellect of other participants. Maybe he reminds me more of Henry Higgins of Shaw's Pygmalion, played so convincingly by Rex Harrison in My Fair Lady. Vocabulary as a weapon to subdue conversational "opponents", where every conversation has a "winner" and a "loser"; whether it begins as a debate or not. Vocabulary becomes more important than substance or original thought; it serves to fool the masses into thinking you might actually know what you are talking about. The clearest indication that he does not is how deftly he veers just ever so slightly off course when challenged; it happened a couple of times in the very thread to which we refer. Quote:
__________________
Jeff '72 911T 3.0 MFI '93 Ducati 900 Super Sport "God invented whiskey so the Irish wouldn't rule the world" |
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Theism vs. Atheism? Is there a debate?
I'm definitely in the theist camp, but it seems to me that both sides fervently believe something that they cannot prove. Sounds like they should be happy with their beliefs and quit trying to prove the other guy wrong...
__________________
Rick 1984 911 coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Beach, Florida, USA
Posts: 7,713
|
I tried to read the entire thread. My heads hurt.
I'm reasonably intelligent, fairly well educated, and widely read. I'm also a believer. I don't think it is hard to reconcile being a thinking, educated person and still be a believer. I happen to think that God created man (and women) and that mankind created God by believing in him. Yeah, there you go, circular, right? Try to find the flaw in the logic. If you don't believe in God, He doesn't exist for you, if you do, He does. Darwin didn't reject the church completely; he was unsure. Einstein believed that there was some higher power that his calculations couldn't account for. All we really know is that if we think we must exist. Everything else is our best reasoning. As they say, reasonable minds can differ. What makes sense to me might not make sense to you.
__________________
MRM 1994 Carrera |
||
![]() |
|