![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 2,057
|
The Housing Situation: People "Up-Side-Down" on Their Home Loans
From this Bloomberg article:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a5kwcrH_LWro&refer=worldwide Quote:
I know owing more than their cars are worth, has been a situation for years for large segments of the population, but the dollar amounts with cars have normally been limited to just being up-side-down by a few thousand dollars, at most. How are people, and our economy, going to handle situations where large numbers of people are up-side-down by tens of thousands of dollars (or more) on their home loans? |
||
![]() |
|
Band.
|
You're not upside-down unless you try to sell.
__________________
1983 SC Coupe 1963 BMW R60/2 1972 Triumph Tiger 1995 Triumph Daytona SuperIII |
||
![]() |
|
Dog-faced pony soldier
|
Or the place burns down. . . or you end up in foreclosure and on the hook for the difference (IIRC in most states you can't be for the first, but the second is another story. . . and the bank can send you a 1099 for the portion they end up eating. . .)
__________________
A car, a 911, a motorbike and a few surfboards Black Cars Matter |
||
![]() |
|
Unconstitutional Patriot
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: volunteer state
Posts: 5,620
|
I think the last number thrown around was ~3.5 million homes with negative equity at the end of 07. If that trend continues, the number spirals to ~8+ million by the end of 2008. Those are significant numbers considering ~55 million households are mortgaged. Families that are content to stay put and can afford the payments will be fine. The ones who are forced to move for various reasons; those are the ones we should be studying. It can/will have a terrible effect on the market and overall economy. There's really nothing we can do, either.
|
||
![]() |
|
canna change law physics
|
How many "cashed out" on a long held property? When I lived in San Diego, we had secretaries driving new BMWs because they refinanced and bought new cars with the $100K in cash they took out. They also took cruises, etc.
What about those who bought properties they couldn't afford? No one held a gun to the head of these people. If the WSJ is correct, we are nearing the bottom.
__________________
James The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the engineer adjusts the sails.- William Arthur Ward (1921-1994) Red-beard for President, 2020 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 31,419
|
Quote:
I never exceed time-proven guidelines on any house or property I have or will purchase.
__________________
1996 FJ80. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: N. Phoenix AZ USA
Posts: 28,943
|
Correct and it was like a feeding frenzy. Those of us who did things the conservative old fashioned way are still doing fine.
__________________
2013 Jag XF, 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins (the workhorse), 1992 Jaguar XJ S-3 V-12 VDP (one of only 100 examples made), 1969 Jaguar XJ (been in the family since new), 1985 911 Targa backdated to 1973 RS specs with a 3.6 shoehorned in the back, 1959 Austin Healey Sprite (former SCCA H-Prod), 1995 BMW R1100RSL, 1971 & '72 BMW R75/5 "Toaster," Ural Tourist w/sidecar, 1949 Aeronca Sedan / QB |
||
![]() |
|
Dog-faced pony soldier
|
It's okay. The next administration is just going to run the old printing press double-time, get more dough$ into circulation and inflate the hell out of the dollar. By doing this, they'll help to offset some of the price declines and claim to be "actively involved in helping people stay in 'their' homes" (*cough* *cough*). Or other similar politically-spun garbage that really serves to help reward greedy wall street bankers and bond ratings agencies that promulgated this. Of course the fact that they're wealthy campaign contributors and "politically connected" has nothing to do with it, right?
![]() Scenario: If a house that your banker buddy is on the hook for $200k for (he extended a $600k loan to some schlocker who works at Taco Bell for $8.50-an-hour three years ago and it's now "worth" $400k), just inflate the currency 60%. Now the home is "worth" $640k, the buyer is "right side up" again and less likely to walk away and stick your banker buddy with the difference, right? PROBLEM SOLVED! Point is, double-digit inflation is coming - and perhaps sooner than y'all think. And it's deliberate. Welcome to 1975 all over again.
__________________
A car, a 911, a motorbike and a few surfboards Black Cars Matter Last edited by Porsche-O-Phile; 05-07-2008 at 05:33 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Friend of Warren
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 16,484
|
And we are the ones that will be penalized in higher taxes to bail out the idiots who thought they had their own printing press for money.
__________________
Kurt V No more Porsches, but a revolving number of motorcycles. |
||
![]() |
|
Control Group
|
Quote:
My buddy has a house that he has been in about 10 years, paid 180K, with 160K mortgage. Did his refi, paid off all the car notes he had, got a note at 2 % less than the original note because of his sterling(more like platinum) credit rating. He only took out 11K, his home mortgage payment went down a few hundred a month, no car payments, 5 cars(including a pair of Cutlasses, BB '70, SB '70 convertible, he is an olds guy) 4WD truck he has had for 18 years that he bought new, and a pair of honda commuter rides. He is teaching his son sound financial principles too. Kid is rolling in an Acura that is nicer than mine and he is 19, building his credit. His home is worth 425K, and he owes less than 150K, after 10 years. He is looking at renting that to his son while he is in college and buying a second home while the market is down. If there are multiple millions of losers, there have to be a few winners/not stupid people.
__________________
She was the kindest person I ever met |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 1,638
|
If you are seriously upside down in a mortgage, whats the downside to walking? A knock to your credit score? a 1099 bill that's small change compared to your equity loss? I can imagine a lot of people leaving the keys in the door and walking.
I still don't think we've hit the 'capitulation' point yet... this could get even more interesting. |
||
![]() |
|
Did you get the memo?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 32,316
|
Many of these people made a fortune selling homes at inflated prices. Now that the bottom falls out, we're supposed to feel sorry for them? I don't think so.
Unfortunately, as usual those of us that made wise choices will pay for the idiots. Guess I should have gotten a Countrywide Jumbo ARM instead of my 20 year fixed.
__________________
‘07 Mazda RX8-8 Past: 911T, 911SC, Carrera, 951s, 955, 996s, 987s, 986s, 997s, BMW 5x, C36, C63, XJR, S8, Maserati Coupe, GT500, etc |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
2022 BMW 530i 2021 MB GLA250 2020 BMW R1250GS |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 8,279
|
No, you are upside down the minute you owe more than the house is worth.
It's not just a sale situation. When you are upside down, for instance, you can no longer use the house as security for a loan. You can no longer pull equity out of it. It is a general indicator of people's financial strength and security, as a whole. People who previously had large equity in their homes who are now upside down likely now have a negative financial net worth. People who go deeply upside down are less likely to continue to struggle to make payments, when they realize they "own" nothing and have no equity to protect. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,990
|
Quote:
I am sure over time, things will be fine. I guess most of our parents that bought homes in the 60's and 70's are fine; and we will be as well as long as you look long term.
__________________
Luis "once was - Wickd89" Carrera 3.2 - "Faster, Stronger, Better" -- 2008 Toyota Camry SE V6 (mine) -- 2005 Toyota Sienna (hers) -- 1989 911 Carrera Cabriolet -SOLD |
||
![]() |
|
Monkey with a mouse
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,006
|
In some ways this situation reminds me of the dot-com bust in 2000 as it relates to "losses".
In the .com bust, trillions of dollars were "lost", but in most cases that money lost was just air to begin with - the losses were against paper profit. I remember taking some big hits, but I actually ended up making more net money than I started with. But, I did lose a significant amount of paper profits. I spent and bought a house in SoCal with some of the profits. I think there are many parallels with that bust and this current housing bust. Losing money, even if it came quick and was largely on paper, is still emotionally difficult. I don't know how much of the current amount in "losses" can be considered "real" and not just big losses against funny money. 2˘ |
||
![]() |
|
Control Group
|
Quote:
__________________
She was the kindest person I ever met |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 1,638
|
Quote:
I know what you are saying, forclosing, walking and moving is a hassle but there have been some huge drops in value (hundreds of thousands of dollars in many cases). Thats a real knock to a net worth and possibly worth the hassle for some. Lets say the timing or numbers were a little worse with your condo out east (if I recall your situation correctly). What skin is it off your back if you were to get a loan on a new place where you are now and then just stop payin on the condo if it was under water. Surely for second and investment homes its not much of a hassle to walk. I know its not the 'honorable' thing to do, but it the numbers certainly might make it worth it. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 1,638
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,357
|
Quote:
__________________
'87 924S (Sold) |
||
![]() |
|