Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   my date tonight and why there won't be a second one (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/419584-my-date-tonight-why-there-wont-second-one.html)

Rick Lee 07-13-2008 03:08 PM

In the DC area a lot of singles mention their politics in their ads on Match.com and other places. I've seen plenty that read something to the effect of "Don't bother if you voted for...". I know it's different in the rest of the country, but DC is pretty divided in that respect.

They have Dem and GOP softball teams, the DNC and RNC have their own softball teams and plenty of Congressional offices do too.

KFC911 07-13-2008 03:11 PM

Could've been even worse than that Fint. She could have said she voted for GWB the second time around and the Iraq fiasco was evidence of GWB's brilliant leadership capabilities :)

rusnak 07-13-2008 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick Lee (Post 4058296)
In the DC area a lot of singles mention their politics in their ads on Match.com and other places. I've seen plenty that read something to the effect of "Don't bother if you voted for...". I know it's different in the rest of the country, but DC is pretty divided in that respect.

They have Dem and GOP softball teams, the DNC and RNC have their own softball teams and plenty of Congressional offices do too.

It's the gerrymandering that causes congressmen and women to feel so secure. If more districts were closely contested, then they wouldn't feed such hate and vitriol. This animosity trickles down to their staffers, and they become posers who feel that they are part of a bigger game, much like the artifical glam attitude that pervades LA, Calif. They become a "class of swaggering sycophants", as noted in the United States Capitol Historical Society "Washington Past and Present"

rusnak 07-13-2008 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 4058276)
At 6 to 4 ya'll shouldn't be passing all that whacked out liberal crap. I'm just saying.


Here's an analysis of the 2004 Presidential election. It shows in general terms that the number of Republican counties in California outnumber the Democrat counties in terms of voter registration. However, Democrats control the more populated cities, and that is why they outnumber Republicans. It is also interesting to note the Orange County, Kern, and Santa Barbara areas which are highly anomalous

http://flanalytics.com/Work%20files/Fall%20Line%20Analytics%20-%20California%20Precinct%20Political%20Index.pdf

varmint 07-13-2008 05:03 PM

i run into this all the time. shame really, i love arguing politics. and having a good fight is sort of a turn on. but most liberal women, and liberals in general, can't argue. they just get offended if you contradict them.

she'll confine her dating to guys with gore 04 stickers on their hybrids, but quietly complain to her girlfriends that all the men in her life are wimps. and never make a connection between the two things.





a few years back i got set up with a nurse. had a nice enough first date. dvorak at the hollywood bowl. steady stream of conversation about nothing. the wine helped. next day i found out that she was a "nurse" at planned parenthood.

still creeps me out.

Pazuzu 07-13-2008 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyg2 (Post 4058172)
Oh was that ever predictable.
Someone talks smack about an uninformed liberal and the rest of them come to her defense. Where's the rest with the name calling? Oh, there they are. Right on time.

:rolleyes:

Wait...are you repeating yourself? "uninformed liberal"? Do you always stutter when you speak? (that was me channeling Mule)

Where in the hell did i make any mention of her political leanings, vs him backtracking on what he claimed? Do you often call people that you wanted to date idiots, after calling them intelligent? Is that acceptable in your social circles?

Joe Bob 07-13-2008 07:55 PM

I still wanna know if got any...screw the political crap.....

RWebb 07-13-2008 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyg2 (Post 4058203)
Smart? she has no concept of a political platform, she has no clue about a politician's position or stance on any important issue yet she states that she is going to vote for him, and you consider that smart? I consider it closer to a certain type of mental handicap (re: liberalism).
Before I get flamed for that I apologize. That wasn't a fair comparison. People with that type of handicap are actually doing their best and at least trying to understand.

You are a strong Obama supporter and we all know why.

- I see you believe the characterization he gave. I don't. I suspect she was trying to be nice to him and doing her damnedest to avoid politics. Go back and reread his 'story' - read between the lines.

- What makes you think I am a strong Obama supporter??? You must be confusing me with someone else.

adrian jaye 07-14-2008 01:41 AM

:d :d :d

Quote:

Originally Posted by pazuzu (Post 4057302)
she Was, Until He Randomly Grilled Her On Her Political Views And Basically Called Her An Idiot...then I Expect She Threw A Drink In His Face And Grabbed A Cab Home.

Wonder Why.


Joeaksa 07-14-2008 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC911 (Post 4058302)
Could've been even worse than that Fint. She could have said she voted for GWB the second time around and the Iraq fiasco was evidence of GWB's brilliant leadership capabilities :)

Or she could be really stupid and have her head in the sand like most of the Dems on this forum! :)

Joeaksa 07-14-2008 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikez (Post 4058859)
I still wanna know if got any...screw the political crap.....

Mike,

He got fuched of course... he picked up the tab as usual!

Joe

KFC911 07-14-2008 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joeaksa (Post 4059164)
Or she could be really stupid and have her head in the sand like most of the Dems on this forum! :)

I've been a Republican all my life, and imo the legacy of GWB's fiascos will be much worse than Carter's, and that's REALLY hard to type :)

Aerkuld 07-14-2008 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)
...see if she's actually aware of B-Ho's stance on a few things like
- not drilling for more oil
- not exploiting all the coal we have
- being against Nuke power
- raising taxes
-killing small businesses
-having a racist wife
-total flip flop/lier on 2nd amendment ( in fact she didn't even know what it was!!)
-Rev Wright...


I don't know what you guys are worried about. From what I hear he'll probably have changed his mind on these issues by the time he gets into office. :D

RWebb 07-14-2008 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC911 (Post 4059191)
I've been a Republican all my life, and imo the legacy of GWB's fiascos will be much worse than Carter's, and that's REALLY hard to type :)

Yup. You may even need to find another party. He's done a lot of damage to the Republican party.

BTW - Bill Moyers had 2 guys on his pbs show last week, both had books out on how to save the party. I can't remember their names tho or the titles. One was old and one young - young guy was a Sr. Ed. at The Atlantic. You might enjoy reading the books.

Pazuzu 07-14-2008 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RWebb (Post 4060030)
Yup. You may even need to find another party.

Does such a thing exist? I don't believe you, sounds like some made up magical fairytale.

Rick Lee 07-14-2008 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RWebb (Post 4060030)
Yup. You may even need to find another party. He's done a lot of damage to the Republican party.

BTW - Bill Moyers had 2 guys on his pbs show last week, both had books out on how to save the party. I can't remember their names tho or the titles. One was old and one young - young guy was a Sr. Ed. at The Atlantic. You might enjoy reading the books.

Yeah, because we all know Bill Moyers would lift a finger to help the GOP.

Tobra 07-14-2008 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057301)
She was ok, and don't get me wrong, I'm usually "easy" hehe,, but I just couldn't deal,, at least if she could argue her point I'd have some respect for her...

as me sainted mother always told me in reference to my ex-wife

"You have to get out of bed and talk to them some time"

Superman 07-15-2008 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)


- not drilling for more oil

This probably seems like a simple issue to you. In reality, it is quite complex. What would you do if you were sitting on an asset that is rapidly gaining in value? Drill and sell immediately?

Also, what impact on the price of gasoline would you expect from, say, a 20% increase, or even a 50% increase, or even a doubling of American oil pumping? Have you thought this through?

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)
- not exploiting all the coal we have

Again, this may seem to you a simple decision but it's not, and not everyone agrees with you.


Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)
- being against Nuke power

ibid.


Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)
- raising taxes

When did Obama raise taxes? What promise to raise taxes has he made? You guys seem to have a certain belief that President Obama will raise taxes, even though you (I assume) are fully aware that liberal presidents SPEND LESS MONEY THAN CONSERVATIVE PRESIDENTS. Oh yeah, they also attempt, and succeed, in balancing the budget......a trivial goal in the minds of conservative presidents, apparently.

Again, you assume taxes will be raised. It is not a fact she, or anybody else, should be aware of.


Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)
-killing small businesses

What small businesses has future President Obama promised to kill?

What part of the Republican Party's vigorous "corporate welfare" policy helps small businesses? I mean, actual small businesses. Do you know the actual definition of "small business?"


Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)
-having a racist wife

Interesting opinion. As with a few of your conclusions above, I suspect you are in the minority, but assuming your beliefs are "fact."


Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)
-total flip flop/lier on 2nd amendment ( in fact she didn't even know what it was!!)

Another opinion. Interestingly, when this campaign reaches its conclusion, I will be interested in your observations regarding flip-flopping. Who do you think will be painted as the undisputed King of Flipflopping? Take a close look at McCain's positions over the years and months before you answer.


Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)
-Rev Wright

Pretending this issue has not been resolved? Do you take responsibility for the remarks of your doctor, minister, etc.? What has Obama said about Mr. Wrights remarks? And knowing this, you continue to pretend Reverend Wright and Barack Obama are the same person?


Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)
If this is the typical housewife in the US we're all in trouble!!!

No. The typical housewife knows much less than this. .......which is how we got our current "administration."


Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4057295)
So I dumped her off in her driveway after two cocktails and an apetizer...

I'm a little surprised you did not punch her.

It sounds like your romantic needs are very specific. Aside from physical appearance, you need someone who knows so little about public policy formation that she supports Bush and other similar (conservative) administrations. Good luck with that.

Superman 07-15-2008 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC911 (Post 4059191)
I've been a Republican all my life, and imo the legacy of GWB's fiascos will be much worse than Carter's, and that's REALLY hard to type :)

Indeed. His legacy will hurt both the Republican Party and the United States of America. Very sad. I actually lament the damage to your party. Honestly. There are responsible Republicans. But yeah, Dubya has really hurt you guys.

9dreizig 07-15-2008 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superman (Post 4061934)
This probably seems like a simple issue to you. In reality, it is quite complex. What would you do if you were sitting on an asset that is rapidly gaining in value? Drill and sell immediately?

Also, what impact on the price of gasoline would you expect from, say, a 20% increase, or even a 50% increase, or even a doubling of American oil pumping? Have you thought this through?
You're missing the point.. Obama doesn't want to do anything at all.. Do you know anything about alternative technology ?? To wait the years he does and not do anything is rediculous and nieve..



Again, this may seem to you a simple decision but it's not, and not everyone agrees with you.
We're talking about curbing the rise in prices due to speculation..



ibid. What does that mean ?




When did Obama raise taxes? What promise to raise taxes has he made? You guys seem to have a certain belief that President Obama will raise taxes, even though you (I assume) are fully aware that liberal presidents SPEND LESS MONEY THAN CONSERVATIVE PRESIDENTS. Oh yeah, they also attempt, and succeed, in balancing the budget......a trivial goal in the minds of conservative presidents, apparently.
Hey true conservatives believe in smaller government, less taxes ( which are proven to increase revenue) and less spending..

Again, you assume taxes will be raised. It is not a fact she, or anybody else, should be aware of. Are you kidding ?? What part of him pleding to repeal the tax cuts and declaring war on "the rich" or raising capital gain taxes did you miss ?? this is a joke right ??




What small businesses has future President Obama promised to kill? Well the manditory medical insurance for all companies for one..

What part of the Republican Party's vigorous "corporate welfare" policy helps small businesses? I mean, actual small businesses. Do you know the actual definition of "small business?"




Interesting opinion. As with a few of your conclusions above, I suspect you are in the minority, but assuming your beliefs are "fact."




Another opinion. Interestingly, when this campaign reaches its conclusion, I will be interested in your observations regarding flip-flopping. Who do you think will be painted as the undisputed King of Flipflopping? Take a close look at McCain's positions over the years and months before you answer.




Pretending this issue has not been resolved? Do you take responsibility for the remarks of your doctor, minister, etc.? What has Obama said about Mr. Wrights remarks? And knowing this, you continue to pretend Reverend Wright and Barack Obama are the same person?
Resolved,?? the fact that he sat in the pew for 20 years and didn't leave due to political expediency pretty much says it all doesn't it ?




No. The typical housewife knows much less than this. .......which is how we got our current "administration."




I'm a little surprised you did not punch her. Why would I punch her ? kind of pitied her..

It sounds like your romantic needs are very specific. Aside from physical appearance, you need someone who knows so little about public policy formation that she supports Bush and other similar (conservative) administrations. Good luck with that.

Hardly,, you've totally missed the point, try going back and reading a few of the posts above
No she needed to know something and at least be able to defend her position other than say " McCain is old"

Pazuzu 07-15-2008 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4061989)
No she needed to know something and at least be able to defend her position other than say " McCain is old"

Why? It's completely and totally her right to want to vote for whomever for whatever reason. Saying that someone must defend their decision on that is tantamount to saying that you do not care about the Constitution.

Pazuzu 07-15-2008 10:56 AM

For some reason I can't edit posts...

What I was going to add was:
Now, I understand what you meant, but is a small step down a very slippery slope between "I won't talk to someone if thet can't defend their political decisions!" to "That person shouldn't vote because they can't defend their political decisions!".

the 07-15-2008 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pazuzu (Post 4061997)
Why? It's completely and totally her right to want to vote for whomever for whatever reason. Saying that someone must defend their decision on that is tantamount to saying that you do not care about the Constitution.

The constitutional right to have a second date with 9dreizig?

I guess that could be covered by a very broad reading of the Third Amendment.

the 07-15-2008 10:58 AM

"Hey big boy, let me quarter your solider . . . "

Pazuzu 07-15-2008 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the (Post 4062009)
The constitutional right to have a second date with 9dreizig?

I guess that could be covered by a very broad reading of the Third Amendment.

Fifth...self incrimination ;)

the 07-15-2008 11:00 AM

Or, depending on how she looks in the morning, the Eighth.

Pazuzu 07-15-2008 11:04 AM

This is fun...

If he gets a bit to physical, then she can envoke the protection of the fourth as well ;)

KFC911 07-15-2008 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4061989)
... No she needed to know something and at least be able to defend her position other than say " McCain is old"

I'm still not sure who I'll be voting for, but if not McCain, that WILL be the reason why. I was very much in favor of McCain (over GWB) back in '00, but I simply do not think (at 72) that he will be up to the task at hand and will simply be a figurehead for Republican party policies that disgust me anymore. I'm not an Obama (Dem) supporter either. I do know enough not to talk politics on a dinner date however, 'cause no matter who they are for, I'm surely gonna lose my appetite and want to puke :)

Tobra 07-15-2008 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by livi (Post 4057320)
Really?

Is general political views so crucial for you Americans, you even ditch an otherwise pleasant, intelligent woman? You need to start living outside the political box, boys! :D Your lives will pass you by while you are nagging like women over political issues.

I am just saying..;)

Not so much which side of the fence she is on, she just has no idea why she is on that side in the first place. I have dated several very liberal women, but if they supported someone, they knew why, and could speak cogently about it. Discussing it is not really the same as nagging.

Voting is important, a priviledge as much as a right. If I am uninformed on a candidate or proposed law, I abstain from voting on that race. If everybody did this, we would have far fewer shady characters in DC
Quote:

Originally Posted by vash (Post 4057691)
"b-Ho"???? i dont get it. isnt it more "b_oh"?

Barack Hussein Obama, hence, Mr Obama is sometimes referred to as B-HO, with the intent to denigrate him

If I can't have a civil discussion on a broad range of subjects during an initial dinner date, why would I want a second?

Rick Lee 07-15-2008 12:25 PM

I've dated a few women who called themselves liberal, but then, once we got to discussing politics (not on the first date;)), were at least as conservative or libertarian as I am. They just confused the meanings of classical vs. contemporary liberalism.

Overpaid Slacker 07-15-2008 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by varmint (Post 4058471)
i run into this all the time. shame really, i love arguing politics. and having a good fight is sort of a turn on. but most liberal women, and liberals in general, can't argue. they just get offended if you contradict them.

she'll confine her dating to guys with gore 04 stickers on their hybrids, but quietly complain to her girlfriends that all the men in her life are wimps. and never make a connection between the two things.

+1 - I love a good debate. I also enjoy fencing with people I agree with, because it's that exercise that hones my positions and shows me the strengths/weaknesses of my and others' arguments.

My personal experience is that most on the Left are simply not equipped for forensic challenge. Not only do they get frustrated (and, often, LOUD!) which further tongue-ties them, but their trembling incoherence is synergized by deeply personal umbrage at the destruction of the shibboleth du jour. They take it so personally.

Then they try to get personal, which is a hoot! Just some random "I heard this witty cutting thing somewhere, so it will zing you" feebleness. It is truly awesome when somebody who doesn't know me and is being crushed starts with the "dumb" or "lay-person" or the "well, you're just _________".

This is not to say that it's ALL people on the Left, or that moderates and righties are uniquely equipped for debate; however, most big-picture Leftist positions (and politicians) are sold to people -- the marketing analogy in an earlier post is very apt, IMHO -- and do not stand up to scrutiny. MSM thinks we're stupid and the message they sell and the messages they propagandize are not to be parsed, but swallowed whole. Simply look at the unquestioning, uncritical delivery of Obamessiah's message and its fawning evangelization to the masses.

Another almost universal tactic is the topic-changement gambit. Once cornered on Topic X, you can actually see the panic, and then the "well what about (unrelated) Topic Y?!?!" ploy (and they obviously know as much about Topic Y as Topic X ... but desperation has set in). My usual response is a slight smirk and "oh, I'd be happy to talk about Topic Y, but how about we don't run away from Topic X just yet. Let's put a bookmark (bunny fingers quotes) on Topic Y and resolve Topic X first." Continued smirk.

Another flavor of this "tactic" is "You are Conservative Evil Incarnate" approach, a/k/a the "I can't defend my position, so I'll attack some random Conservative position (or, more likely, a caricature thereof) as though you've espoused it". If we're talking specifically about Lefty Position A, which they have espoused and defended, when that gleam of panic strikes, I get Conservative Position A thrown in my face. Now, just to let facts clutter this up for a second, I haven't espoused Conservative Position A, nor do I believe or see much merit in Conservative Position A. I'll usually ask "are you looking for your keys over here because the light's better?"

Add to this calculus the likelihood that, the hotter the girl, the more deference/ intellectual slack she's received from everyone in her life.

I think 9dreizing saved himself, and the benighted twist, a lot of frustration. No naked, sweaty squirt has been worth my pandering to some dumb broad.

If she had an informed position on any of the issues, then you can agree to disagree, or even have fun with your differences. Her position was specifically, and almost willfully unenlightened. If you're not specifically informed about politics, treat it like surgery, private aviation or big-game hunting: don't try to "dabble" in it.

JP

Superman 07-15-2008 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4061989)
Hardly,, you've totally missed the point, try going back and reading a few of the posts above
No she needed to know something and at least be able to defend her position other than say " McCain is old"

I do understand. You are suggesting she is not sufficiently informed. She did not have sufficient responses to your questions.

Notice this: Your responses are insufficient in my view. You mentioned oil drilling, coal, racist wife, raised taxes, etc. All those assumptions are 100% unsupported and have no basis whatsoever in fact. Someone holding these opinions would be more incorrect, and less informed than someone holding no opinion whatsoever on those matters.

Sorry, dude. You didn't dump her because she was underinformed. You dumped her because she lacks the misunderstandings you have.

Superman 07-15-2008 01:54 PM

"Too old" is a good enough reason all by itself. And quite frankly, it betrays a level of awareness above that of the typical voter.

scottmandue 07-15-2008 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by livi (Post 4057320)
Really?

Is general political views so crucial for you Americans, you even ditch an otherwise pleasant, intelligent woman? You need to start living outside the political box, boys! :D Your lives will pass you by while you are nagging like women over political issues.

I am just saying..;)

I'm with Livi on this one, you boys take yourselves and you politics WAY too seriously.

9dreizig 07-15-2008 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superman (Post 4062388)
"Too old" is a good enough reason all by itself. And quite frankly, it betrays a level of awareness above that of the typical voter.

Clearly the 10 months of rain you get up there has soaked your brain beyond repair..

Superman 07-15-2008 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by varmint (Post 4058471)
i run into this all the time. shame really, i love arguing politics. and having a good fight is sort of a turn on. but most liberal women, and liberals in general, can't argue. they just get offended if you contradict them.

Really? I can provide you with a LONG list of liberals you would have no fun arguing with at all.

Any time you're in Seattle, let me know. I can provide you with a virtually endless parade of beers, and all the debate for which you have time. This business of "libers' understanding is sooooooo shallow" doesn't pass the straight face test.

Tell me again how the Liberal Media and the Liberal University System is packed with people who know nothing. Yes, college professors tend to be liberal. Yes, media people tend to be liberal. It amuses me endlessly to hear conservatives declare these people, the information traffickers in our society, to be poorly informed and without ammunition for debate.

There is a direct correlation between level of education and liberalism. The correlation between level of education and conservatism is inverse. It is a negative "r" value.

But it is very funny to hear folks pretend that liberals are not informed. Liberals are not armed with data or information or education. That's a good one.

scottmandue 07-15-2008 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobra (Post 4062068)
I abstain from voting on that race. If everybody did this, we would have far fewer shady characters in DC

race? shady?

:p

Superman 07-15-2008 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4062396)
Clearly the 10 months of rain you get up there has soaked your brain beyond repair..

I am stunned by your flawless and unassailable logic.

Pazuzu 07-15-2008 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superman (Post 4062424)
I am stunned by your flawless and unassailable logic.

Duh. He's a conservative, and you're a liberal, and therefore, he knows better than you.

At least he claims to be a conservative...

So there.

mattdavis11 07-15-2008 05:14 PM

Damn Pazu, are you one of those Dan Patrick right wingers that everyone laughs at?

I sure hope not. That's one of the larger jokes that has ever set foot inside the Capitol doors in Austin. I'm sure you care not b/c Arizona is far more conservative, and runs a tighter show anyway, but I'm just curious, do you align yourself with that man, and is he your State Senator?

I could care less what politcal team the woman I am dating roots for, and I'm not going to be turned off by her politcal stance. Some of the younger republican chicks are the worst lay in the world because they worry too much about the repercussions, others will blow your mind.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.