Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Why is a fish when it swims? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/439849-why-fish-when-swims.html)

DARISC 11-06-2008 10:04 PM

Why is a fish when it swims?
 
The answer to that question is supposedly "Because the higher it flies, the much."

That question was posed "years" ago and I, to this very day, deeply regret the reticence that I felt at the time regarding questioning the veracity of that answer. Until now.

Is anyone familiar with this issue who could perhaps step forth and offer clarification?

adrian jaye 11-07-2008 03:40 AM

Many fishes swim by contracting and relaxing a succession of muscle blocks, called myomeres, alternately on each side of the body, starting at the head and progressing down toward the tail. The alternate shortening and relaxing of successive muscle blocks, which bends part of the body first toward one side and then toward the other, results in a series of waves traveling down the fish's body. The rear part of each wave thrusts against the water and propels the fish forward. This type of movement is quite clearly seen in the freshwater eel. Because movement of the head back and forth exerts drag, which consumes additional energy and slows travel, a great many fishes have modified this snakelike motion by keeping the waves very small along most of the length of the body, in some cases showing no obvious movement at all, and then increasing them sharply in the tail region. It is the end of the traveling waves that moves the tail forcefully back and forth, providing the main propulsion for forward motion. A simpler form of tail propulsion is seen in such inflexible-bodied fishes as the trunkfish, which simply alternates contractions of all the muscle blocks on one side of the body with those on the other side, causing the tail to move from side to side like a sculling paddle.

Some of the predatory bony fishes are the fastest swimmers; they can cruise at speeds that are between three and six times their body length per second and may be able to reach 9 to 13 body lengths per second in very short bursts. Some fishes, such as the blenny, which has been timed at 0.8 km/hr (0.5 mph), swim very slowly; others, such as the salmon, which may reach a sustained speed of 13 km/hr (8 mph), move much faster; and it has been estimated that tuna may reach speeds of 80 km/hr (50 mph), and swordfish, 97 km/hr (60 mph).

Dottore 11-07-2008 03:50 AM

What are you on, and where can I get some?

svandamme 11-07-2008 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dottore (Post 4287916)
What are you on, and where can I get some?

pm your adress for a welcome/trial package

ckissick 11-07-2008 06:25 AM

I dare not attempt to answer this one. A physicist might refute me.

sketchers356 11-07-2008 06:27 AM

As a physicist, a falling fish can be approximated as a point mass in a vacuum.

DARISC 11-07-2008 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sketchers356 (Post 4288209)
As a physicist, a falling fish can be approximated as a point mass in a vacuum.

The falling physicist fish fable...right.

Like, physicist fish really exist.

We're not all fools here, you know.

scottmandue 11-07-2008 06:46 AM

How do lesbians figure in to this post?

Burnin' oil 11-07-2008 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DARISC (Post 4287776)
The answer to that question is supposedly "Because the higher it flies, the much."

That question was posed "years" ago and I, to this very day, deeply regret the reticence that I felt at the time regarding questioning the veracity of that answer. Until now.

Is anyone familiar with this issue who could perhaps step forth and offer clarification?


Which "issue?" The question? The answer? Your regret? Your reticence? The veracity of the answer? Your questioning of the answer? Why you put "years" in quotes? You have to be much more specific before I cannot help you.

scottmandue 11-07-2008 06:55 AM

Excellent answer Adrian however I think you missed the point completely... you explain the how of a fish not the why.

I believe the why of a fish is to be served raw on a little piece of rice with some wasabei.

M.D. Holloway 11-07-2008 07:03 AM

And does the fish know what water is if it surrounds it, provides its nurishment and a means of moving - when it doesn't have a point of reference? But I suppose it would miss it dearly once brought on deck only to be scaled, gutted, filleted, decapitated and consumed in all manner. Then the fish would understand clearly of this water and would miss it madly - that stuff that they know not of until it wasn't...

I like Fatty Tuna...Toro Thank You!

DARISC 11-07-2008 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burnin' oil (Post 4288257)
Which "issue?" The question? The answer? Your regret? Your reticence? The veracity of the answer? Your questioning of the answer? Why you put "years" in quotes? You have to be much more specific before I cannot help you.

My query qualifies, quite quintessentially, as a quest for clarification and your attempt at obfuscation is...well, extremely obfuscating. To be specific.

Your "years in quotes" question is better left unaddressed. For now.

kang 11-07-2008 07:20 AM

42

sketchers356 11-07-2008 07:25 AM

Actually its 42 and a third.

DARISC 11-07-2008 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottmandue (Post 4288275)
I believe the why of a fish is to be served raw on a little piece of rice with some wasabei.

I wouldn't eat fish with ANY wasabei! It has nothing to do with race; I would break bread with a masai any day of the week (I don't think they eat fish).

The wasabei and the masai are verrrry different people.

I went to Africa once (one of my favorite countries) and asked a swahili why that was. He said "I have no idea. I'm only a language."

Dantilla 11-07-2008 08:02 AM

I thought this was the anti-phishing thread. Stoopid criminals.....

Now where did I put my keys?

ckissick 11-07-2008 08:21 AM

If a fish were to be put in a bucket of water and spun in the deepest, darkest part of space with no stars for reference points, would it swim?

HardDrive 11-07-2008 08:25 AM

Man I wish I had some shrooms.

911boost 11-07-2008 09:26 AM

Its ok to eat fish, cause they don't have any feelings

M.D. Holloway 11-07-2008 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckissick (Post 4288518)
If a fish were to be put in a bucket of water and spun in the deepest, darkest part of space with no stars for reference points, would it swim?

only if it was given the promise of medical benefits - then it would only do so to pick up a 40oz and thats about it


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.