![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Would a 335d on the moon beat a Veyron on earth?
Assuming said car 335d was on the moon and had access to
a) a road b) oxygen Given the difference is air resistance, weight, etc, could it, could it outperform a Veyron....
__________________
tk 08 911 C2S - Sold 13 Audi A4 14 Jeep SRT 500HP |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Just the cost of getting it there would surpass the purchase price of a Veyron! I am guessing no.
__________________
A nose heavy airplane flies poorly, a tail heavy plane flies once. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I'd say no since I believe it would have extreme traction issues in a low gravity environment.
__________________
1979 911SC "Frankencab" Dave |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 21,159
|
The car on the moon would also produce far less downforce from aerodynamic aids if there were any turns in the course.
|
||
![]() |
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,159
|
Even in a drag race, I think the 335 would be screwed.
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() Last edited by masraum; 10-06-2009 at 10:00 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Custom User Title
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,294
|
You bring up an interesting idea though- moon racing. All the dynamics would be vastly different. You could have some awesome elevation changes on the craters, and there might be instances where leaving the ground would be beneficial.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,456
|
Top speed, or acceleration?
The mass on the moon would be the same, give or take, as the mass on Earth. The reduced weight would only cause traction problems, it wouldn't have any other effect on the acceleration. The reduced aero drag would only be a factor if the 335 had gearing tall enough to outrun the Veyron. The Veyron would spank the 335 in acceleration. JR |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,550
|
Gearing limitations...even with zero drag.
__________________
"Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have a radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. '73) (I, Paul D. have loved this quote since 1973. It will remain as long as I post here.) |
||
![]() |
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,159
|
Quote:
The law above applies to mass, not weight. So the reduced gravity of the moon won't affect that law. The reduced weight will reduce the amount of friction, which means the tires will be able to apply less force. The 335d would be a tire smoking dog on the moon (assuming there was enough friction to build enough heat to smoke the tires). If the first law were different on the moon, then the thing would get knocked out of orbit by the first decent rock to smack it.
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
canna change law physics
|
Geez Steve, you're starting to sound like me on this bored!
__________________
James The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the engineer adjusts the sails.- William Arthur Ward (1921-1994) Red-beard for President, 2020 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,456
|
Quote:
JR |
||
![]() |
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,159
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Yes, I felt like that was what you were getting at, but I wasn't sure if there was enough detail for the original poster to get the cause.
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
I wonder if you could extrapolate anything from this information here on the original Lunar Rover? Looks like driving on the moon is a lot like driving on snow here on Earth.
The Apollo 15 Lunar Rover on the Moon
__________________
1987 Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe (2018- Present) 1968 Porsche 911 #11830133 (2008- 2012) 1968 Porsche 911T #11820522 (1997- 2007) |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
|
They'd both get smoked by the original Moon Car
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 2,560
|
Assuming a 335d weighs around 3200 pounds it would weigh about 530 pounds on the moon. It would be like racing a 265hp ATV against a Veyron, I think it would be difficult without AWD.
|
||
![]() |
|
drag racing the short bus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Location, Location...
Posts: 21,983
|
The 335d would still get better fuel mileage.
![]()
__________________
The Terror of Tiny Town |
||
![]() |
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,159
|
Quote:
The mass of a 3200 pound car on the moon is exactly the same as it's mass here on the earth. So you've got the same amount on inertia to overcome (acceleration) but since the car only weighs 1/4th as much, you've got 1/4th the traction. Accelerating in a car on the moon would be like taking a car with summer tires and trying to accelerate on snow or ice.
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 8,713
|
Correct. The 335 will still only go 0-60 in 6 second (or whatever) no matter what planet it's on. If there's enough gear, it'll have a higher top speed (almost no wind resistance), but you'd still be stuck at whatever redline in 6th gear is (5th gear?).
__________________
Mike Bradshaw 1980 911SC sunroof coupe, silver/black Putting the sick back into sycophant! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
the power / weight thing is something that i suspected would get messy.
what about the fact that the quad turbos wouldn't be as efficient? i guess they would work the same however if the ratios of air were equal. if we are providing air to the cars then then it would be the same correct? or maybe even if the air was there, the pressure would be more disastrous for the veyron....
__________________
tk 08 911 C2S - Sold 13 Audi A4 14 Jeep SRT 500HP |
||
![]() |
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,159
|
I think the assumptions are, the engines are provided what they need to work the same as they do here. The "problem" to be overcome is one of reduced gravity and wind resistance (which would come way down the line).
The really big problem (assuming the engines are fine) is the minimal traction on the moon. It'd be like drag racing in snow. It's not really power to weight. Here on the earth, we can use that because the weight of any mass, pretty much anywhere is close enough to the same for it to not matter. The real term should be power to mass, and that means that the power to mass is the same no matter what planet you're on. That means that if you drop a car on 3 different planets of 3 different gravitational pulls, you'll have the same power to weight (mass) but different traction levels because of the different weights.
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() Last edited by masraum; 10-06-2009 at 12:50 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|