|
|
|
|
|
|
AutoBahned
|
Quote:
BTW - I don't know anything about the Jones Act, but if it is illegal, then the Govt. cannot do it. Only after Congress passed another modificiation to the Jones Act could the govt. do anything. |
||
|
|
|
|
gduke2010
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
"O"man(are we in trouble)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: On the edge
Posts: 16,452
|
Quote:
I can appreciate that a court case in India is handled much differently than in the US but it also seems that the bigger the case and more publicity it gets the longer the court dealings and negotiated settlements. The lawyers will make a killing on this for years to come. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 7,259
|
Steffy: U.S. and BP slow to accept Dutch expertise | Business: Loren Steffy | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
Here is an artcle relating to the DEMA offer to assist in the berm building along the gulf coast. It would seem that the admin said thanks, but no thanks. Disgracefully arrogant IMHO. THe Jones Act, sure that is in place but in an emergency action must be taken. Dithering goofballs.
__________________
the unexamined life is not worth living, unless you are reading posts by goofballs-Socrates 88 coupe |
||
|
|
|
|
AutoBahned
|
speaking of goofballs... go back up and read my response
if it is illegal, the Govt. cannot do it. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 7,259
|
I find it amusing when you say "if it is illegal, the Govt. cannot do it." Oh brother, the irony.
This disaster needs some thinking outside the normal parameters.
__________________
the unexamined life is not worth living, unless you are reading posts by goofballs-Socrates 88 coupe |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Bandwidth AbUser
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 29,522
|
If it's against the law and the Gov't does it, you b_tch.
If it's against the law and the Gov't doesn't do it, you b_tch. LOL.
__________________
Jim R. |
||
|
|
|
|
"O"man(are we in trouble)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: On the edge
Posts: 16,452
|
An interesting article on BP future options.
BP hit by doubts over ability to pay spill costs - MarketWatch |
||
|
|
|
|
83 911 Production Cab #10
|
... They don`t want our oil either. No problemo, I think the Chinese will take it
![]() ![]() ![]() But don`t come crying when you ran out!!! Key US City Acts to Avoid 'Dirty' Tar Sands Fuel : LA IMC
__________________
Who Will Live... Will See ![]() ![]() ![]() 83 911 Production Cab #10, Slightly Modified: Unslanted, 3.2, PMO EFI, TECgt, CE 911 CAM Sync / Pulley / Wires, SSI, Dansk Sport 2/2, 17" Euromeister, CKO GT3 Seats, Going SOK Super Charger Last edited by JJ 911SC; 06-09-2010 at 07:33 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 7,259
|
The Jones Act was temporarily waived following Katrina. This was done under Bush, if Obama can't figure out how to get this done perhaps he should stop looking for ass and acquire some leadership skill.
From Wiki case by case basis. Waivers have been granted for example, in cases of national emergencies or in cases of strategic interest. For instance, declining oil production prompted MARAD to grant a waiver to operators of the 512-foot Chinese vessel Tai An Kou to tow an oil rig from the Gulf of Mexico to Alaska. The jackup rig will be under a two-year contract to drill in the Alaska's Cook Inlet Basin. The waiver to the Chinese vessel is said to be the first of its kind granted to an independent oil-and-gas company.[6] In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff temporarily waived the U.S. Shipping Act for foreign vessels carrying oil and Natural gas from September 1 to 19, 2005. [1][2] Pressure exerted by 21 agriculture groups, including the American Farm Bureau Federation, failed to secure a U.S. Shipping waiver following Hurricane Katrina. The groups contended that farmers would be adversely affected without additional shipping options to transport grains and oilseeds.[6] There are certain American ports which are exempt from provisions of the Jones Act. They are Guam, American Samoa and the Northern Marianas in the Pacific and the United States Virgin Islands in the Caribbean. There have historically been sufficiently few calls to those ports that requiring American cabotage was assumed to be a hardship.[citation needed
__________________
the unexamined life is not worth living, unless you are reading posts by goofballs-Socrates 88 coupe |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Sensible, or grand-standing?
"Attorney General McCollum today sent a letter to BP asking the company to deposit no less than $2.5 billion into an interest-earning escrow account so Florida can be assured of its availability to the state and its citizens and businesses over the long-term recovery period. "Based on recent estimates from an economist, Florida could ultimately see losses as great as $2.2 billion, as well as a sharp decline in employment in the industries directly impacted by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill," wrote the Attorney General. "As Florida braces for what will likely be a staggering blow to its economy with significant impacts to our state's workforce and the revenues of the state and local governments, it is essential that BP establish immediately a dedicated escrow account solely for the purpose of paying claims and damages to Florida and its citizens."
__________________
1989 3.2 Carrera coupe; 1988 Westy Vanagon, Zetec; 1986 E28 M30; 1994 W124; 2004 S211 What? Uh . . . he and him? |
||
|
|
|
|
AutoBahned
|
the waiver notion is interesting, but I'd want to do legal research on conditions req'd for a waiver before saying Obama could do it, much less whether he should
I still don't see what the Dutch offer would really accomplish |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Leuven, Belgium. Home of Stella-Artois
Posts: 665
|
Quote:
Something you will not hear about Stateside. Only a few days after the start of the spill, representatives from the company offered their services. Moving the vessel would have taken three weeks. They were turned down. This was just in the news and probably a bit onesided info from the company itself. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Champaign and Burgundy 3.2 (1986) Ex-C4 91 Ex C4 93 A8 3.0 TDI X5 |
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Leuven, Belgium. Home of Stella-Artois
Posts: 665
|
They also offered the help of the two largest suction hoppers in the world which can basically suck-up the oil with tubes of 4 ft diameter down to 450 ft depth. This is coming from one of the largest dredging company in the world, with a specialisation in oil and gas. The company rep said he has never been so frustrated in his life. After having been himself for several weeks on scene he now says he hopes to have their boats set course for the Gulf.
Quote:
__________________
Champaign and Burgundy 3.2 (1986) Ex-C4 91 Ex C4 93 A8 3.0 TDI X5 |
||
|
|
|
|
It'll be legen-waitforit
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 7,046
|
They won't let them in because they've got Kevin Kostner going to help now...
I think it's time to take the whole thing out of BP's hands give it to the Navy/Gov and any experts available; BP can just stand in the back of the room writing cheques. Getting really sick of seeing the live feeds; with zero results
__________________
Bob James 06 Cayman S - Money Penny 18 Macan GTS Gone: 79 911SC, 83 944, 05 Cayenne Turbo, 10 Panamera Turbo |
||
|
|
|
|
AutoBahned
|
well, right now it won't help to suck up more of the mix, b/c they cannot process any more (separate the oil from the oil/water mix) -- unless you mean skimming the slick up
interesting tho, any info on who says what about why they were turned down? did a reporter say "why not waive the Jones Act? Bush did it."?? Last edited by RWebb; 06-10-2010 at 09:28 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
AutoBahned
|
quick tidbit:
The requirements for a Jones Act waiver include: * a 12-passenger limit * a U.S. citizen must own the vessel |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Garp, those dredging ships sound nice but what would they achieve here? One can deposit rocks on the ocean floor, but earlier discussion in this thread was that the oil is at such a pressure that dumping the biggest concrete block on the well isn't going to stop it. The other can suck up water from a depth of 470 feet, but isn't the well 5,000 feet deep? I may be missing your point, but I doubt there is a silver bullet that has been on offer since day one but was rejected for no good reason.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
Our current government is pushing and unpopular "environmental" tax that will be in the $900 billion range.
Lots of pushing back as it is a really, really bad idea. The bigger this BP oil spill gets, the bigger the coverage is, the bigger the outrage they generate, the better chance they have to push their social engineering experiment through. They want this spill to be huge. They want the general public (uninformed morons) to be all upset so their knee-jerk reactions will be to support the administration's huge energy tax. You are all being played for fools and are willing participants. Like our president likes to say, never let a crisis go to waste. His force has a strong influence on the weak-minded. Last edited by sammyg2; 06-11-2010 at 01:38 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
Quote:
Do you really think a bunch of bureaucrats know more about stopping a leak a mile deep than the people who do this kind of thing for a living? Seriously? |
||
|
|
|