![]() |
|
|
|
On Tour
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,497
|
1979 mgb
How crazy am I to be considering this purchase? I get that they are old, slow and British. Prince of Darkness.. What else?
Ready for a new toy. I'm sure a 1st gen Boxster would be a much better choice but not Vintage, not unique. Classic 1979 MGB
__________________
- 2018 Cayenne S 958.2 - 1988 Carrera 3.2 Coupe Marine Blue (SOLD) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Oswego, OR
Posts: 6,042
|
Please no. The MGB is a lovely car. I had a 65. With emissions clamp down, bumper height restrictions, and BMC refusing to put any dollars towards r&d, the 1979 B is way way slower and less fun than my lovely 65. The later B's were dogs. Early ones were slow but fun. Please reconsider.
|
||
![]() |
|
On Tour
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,497
|
So I need to find a 74 or earlier version or one with a V8 conversion?
__________________
- 2018 Cayenne S 958.2 - 1988 Carrera 3.2 Coupe Marine Blue (SOLD) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: NY
Posts: 6,877
|
Or a TR.
Equally old. Marginally less slow. The V8s can be fun. Not quick, but fun to tool around in. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: bottom left corner of the world
Posts: 22,700
|
Sunbeam Tiger.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Oswego, OR
Posts: 6,042
|
So I need to find a 74 or earlier version or one with a V8 conversion?
I think all old car = (mostly) slow cars. Slow isn't always bad. What is bad is a 1970's sports car that is slower than a 91 Ford Explorer. And handles about the same. MG, Triumph. Alfa, etc all made fun and lovely cars. What is your attractions. Classic coolness? Weekend cruiser? Like to tinker? All considerations. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
I had a BRG MGB. Cannot remember the year. I bought it and within days realized I was getting 200 miles to a quart of oil. Only after purchase did I put my finger in the exhaust pipe and finger was sticky with oil. Where were you guys back in the 70's? PPI? No. Duh....
I did not find it an exciting driver. Pretty bland. Certainly no Porsche. And not as much fun as a Triumph TR3. If you can find a rust free one it might be okay. Whenever I see one running I go up to the driver and congratulate him on his commitment to the marque. The neatest setup I have seen recently in an old British car was a Triumph Spitfire with a V8 shoehorned in it. I tried to flag it down but was too fast. If it was the original 4 cylinder I could have caught up with it. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fla panhandle / Roaming in my motorhome
Posts: 4,332
|
MGs lost their uniqueness with the high production Bs.
If stuck on that era, I'd look for a clean MGB GT, possibly the V8 version. But for really interesting and unusual, how about the MGA ![]() Cheers Richard |
||
![]() |
|
FUSHIGI
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: somewhere between here and there
Posts: 10,731
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Oswego, OR
Posts: 6,042
|
^^^not so crazy. Just get informed, like you are.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
![]() Here's my 1980. From the 80s. With my now wife. |
||
![]() |
|
On Tour
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,497
|
Very cool pic!
Quote:
The MGB-GT with a V8 conversion interests me the most but will be much harder to find. Thanks for all the feedback.
__________________
- 2018 Cayenne S 958.2 - 1988 Carrera 3.2 Coupe Marine Blue (SOLD) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lake Cle Elum - Eastern WA.
Posts: 8,416
|
A hell of a lot of us with a Porsche (or two) worked our way thru the ranks by owning Brit iron in the distant past. (cars and motorcycles).
I'd only go back for a early XKE roadster like my '62. I've had MG, 59 AH 100-6, and the XKE. A BSA 441 two Norton Commandos, and two Triumph Bonny's. Even my Fiat 124 was an upgrade.
__________________
Bob S. 73.5 911T 1969 911T Coo' pay (one owner) 1960 Mercedes 190SL 1962 XKE Roadster (sold) - 13 motorcycles Last edited by LakeCleElum; 10-23-2016 at 07:46 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North of You
Posts: 9,160
|
I knew someone who was a true MGB expert. Swore they were the greatest car, the most fun, etc, etc.
I let him drive my 'well sorted' 911. He no longer owns any MGB's. He's a P-car convert. There is no comparison. If you can afford a 911 go that route.
__________________
"A machine you build yourself is a vote for a different way of life. There are things you have to earn with your hands." |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fla panhandle / Roaming in my motorhome
Posts: 4,332
|
No need to find a conversion.
MG built GTs with the Buick based rover aluminum V 8. Same weight as the 4 cyl engine. My brother had a MGB V8 roadster right hand drive. Very nice engine, a bit more power than the 4cyl engine. And a very nice classic V8 sound. One up side I noticed with MGs TRs is the smiles there bring out in folks looking at them, some how more loved by passers by. Cheers Richard Last edited by tevake; 10-23-2016 at 07:57 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
G'day!
|
Awesome pic - thanks for sharing!
BTW, does that LR wheel look a little tilted? I was told once (as a qualifier) that the best MG's were the ones with metal - not rubber - bumpers. The one in the CL ad has the wrong bumpers - but I'm also not digging the colour scheme, including the door panels. Just my 2 centavos...
__________________
Old dog....new tricks..... |
||
![]() |
|
Functionista
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: CO
Posts: 7,717
|
79 was not a good year for Bs. But once you get rid of the cat and put some good carbs on it, a cam plus more compression, some weight loss and it becomes a fun car. Plus the aftermarket has everything one would need for these so it passes the "no longer available" test. Also the price of entry is low compared to chrome bumper versions.
__________________
Jeff 74 911, #3 I do not disbelieve in anything. I start from the premise that everything is true until proved false. Everything is possible. Last edited by manbridge 74; 10-23-2016 at 09:11 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,673
|
On the B, rubber bumpers started with '74.5. They also RAISED the suspension to meet headlight height requirements (DOT). And decreased power for emissions, eventually going from 2 carbs to one.
So, if you get one, get a chrome bumper car. Early 74 and earlier. They are OK to tour around in at moderate speeds with the top down. Last edited by tcar; 10-23-2016 at 02:48 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I would think you could have a lot more of the same kind of fun with this:
1994 Mazda Miata - Classic Red - with A/C ...and save some money too.
__________________
Scott '78 SC mit Sportomatic - Sold |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,354
|
I got a call from an old friend of mine just last week. He is in to the Military collectible stuff and at a trade show traded a U Boat sailors cap (that he's had for a long time, says you can't give that stuff away at a show) to his fellow trade show partner, a Lawyer, for a 77 MGB. Says he had $200 in the cap, so if he can get it running and driving for about $2000 he thinks he did ok. Otherwise, he thinks he can part it out for more than the $200 investment. I told him good luck with that.
|
||
![]() |
|