![]() |
Quote:
|
Then we have to figure out how to tax the electric cars for using the road as there will be less income from taxes on a gallon of gasoline as there is less used.
I am not saying that as a dis on electric, but our legislators are very short sighted and won't think of it until we are in crisis mode again. |
Tax EV? LOL!
We are giving them money. Take away the tax incentive and tax them to cover the road usage and the EV fairytale goes down the tubes. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The grid in every American city has a huge amount of unused capacity.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1513799504.jpg |
Quote:
That graph is also in KWs. To charge one truck it takes 1+ MW. |
Somehow the peak demand is met every day...graph it in Watts, mWatts or GWatts, the demand drops by 1/3 at night almost everywhere.
And if the cost is demand based then it will self level. In the end the main complaint will be cost. |
Quote:
Here is a link: https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2017-04-25/u-s-power-demand-flatlined-years-ago-and-it-s-hurting-utilities You are right though, demand does decrease at night. It would not be cost efficient to run peaker plants 24/7. Are you proposing everyone charges their cars at night? Would be interesting how the trucking industry responds. Electric cars will require more natural gas plants (or nuke/pump storage) no matter how you look at it. Also load serving entities will jack up your power bill. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
There are so many skeletons in the EV closet that no one wants to talk about. -Environmentally, over the life of the vehicle the components and batteries are far worse than combustion engine.
-There is not such thing as a "zero emissions" vehicle-you are just hiding emissions in a power plant somewhere. Increased demand means more need for oil, coal, nuclear (wind & solar are not able to contribute a remote speck of what is needed). -As stated, the power grid is not even remotely capable of handling the power production increase (no, not everyone can charge only at night). -When power demands go up, the entire system will have to be improved and that means the utility will increase your bill to pay for the improvements. Business costs go up so you pay more for everything you buy. Homeowners utility bills go up... -We have no real long term data on how long the batteries will last and environmentally the disposal is going to be a nightmare. If you go the recycling route (and most likely you will be required to do so for the environment), then the cost will go even higher. -The more complex EVs get, the more cost of repair will go up. DIY will be unthinkable and you will be held hostage to go to the dealer. We have several threads about that joy already. The list goes on and on. I predict that there will come a day when technology will be able to do what we dream about today but, until then, don't expect the 90% to be forced to use what only 10% of the world thinks is viable. |
^Nice summary!
|
The vast majority of people will charge at night, additionally batteries are already being used to store base load for discharging during the day. Many places can increase their base output, but there is no demand. Battery storage helps in the regard. Both as a load and as a back-up source.
The source of the electricity simply changes the clean-air math. With nuclear or green energy as the source a gasoline driven car can't be cleaner than electric. For coal the number is closer to 40 mpg; above that a car is cleaner. For he typical mix of power I think I read 55 mpg is the crossover point. Very few people actually achieve 55 mpg. The vast majority of 'anti' arguments are based on the unsuitability for long trips (which are small percentage of most people's usage) and a 'net environmental' concern that no one has proven either way. I don't want one. Ever. But they are coming, and lots of people will drive them. |
Quote:
|
And the polution created when producing a huge windmill?
The only thing I see positive is that the polution is moved outside the cities. Environmentally (the whole span!) I THINK the EV is no better then other solutions. |
Wind turbines are not a major plus because of environmental concerns with birds and bats, noise pollution if located near where people live (low but can have psychological effects), major acreage needed unless in a hilly location, unreliable output since winds pick up and slow down and, just not enough power to offset the major demands of a modern society.
|
Quote:
I remember seeing a chart on the amount of energy used by the cars and trucks on the road at any moment. It was converted to megawatt hours. It was a lot of energy. |
“Long trips” in the context of an EV is a relative term. In the past month I have taken at least five round trip drives that would exceed the range of any EV on the market. Once you get outside of heavy urban driving environments the practicality starts getting very limited for people that don’t have cars dedicated for city use.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website