![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 25
|
![]()
I am about to time the cams on my 911, I have E cams, a 70.4 crank, and S P/C's. I noticed that the E cams from 69-71 have a valve overlap of 3.15 and the 72-73 have an overlap of 2.9. Can anyone please explain why the difference, isn't an E cam an E cam regardless of year? What would you advise for my engine. Thanks for the help.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, NY
Posts: 21,140
|
![]()
on p207 of Wayne's 911 Engine Rebuild Book is the part no. and timing for the different year E-cams.
The part no is the same for the 1969-71 & 1972-73 E-cams The timing is different. I did the early timing no, 3.0-3.3mm, because I'm using carbs and want an advanced cam timing......... Ron
__________________
Ronin LB '77 911s 2.7 PMO E 8.5 SSI Monty MSD JPI w x6 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Actually according to the BA book the early E cam is wilder than the later cam and thus the need for a different timing spec.
__________________
Tim 1973 911T 2005 VW GTI "Dave, hit the brakes, but don't look like your htting the brakes...what? I DON'T KNOW, BRAKE CASUAL!!!" dtw's thoughts after nearly rear ending a SHP officer Last edited by Tim Walsh; 11-30-2003 at 03:36 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, NY
Posts: 21,140
|
![]() Quote:
and the Stoddard E-cam numbers match the numbers in Wayne's book. So maybe the BA info refers to the E-cam timing....... Ron
__________________
Ronin LB '77 911s 2.7 PMO E 8.5 SSI Monty MSD JPI w x6 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
"Actually according to the BA book the early E cam is wilder than the earlier cam and thus the need for a different timing spec."
Tim, I'm confused by this statement. There is only one E cam. What earlier E cam is wilder than the early cam? With a 70.4 crank, I'd go with the 2.9 mm spec. This setting should help the E cams which tend to run out of breath at higher revs. Low and mid-range torque should be sufficient using the long stroke crank. Sherwood http://members.rennlist.org/911pcars |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, NY
Posts: 21,140
|
![]() Quote:
I want it advanced for lower rpm torque curve.......Ron
__________________
Ronin LB '77 911s 2.7 PMO E 8.5 SSI Monty MSD JPI w x6 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 25
|
Thanks Sherwood. I didn'y think there were different E cams. Sounds like the longer stroke makes the difference. Sorry for the double posting, I posted in this forum by accident as I thought I was in the 911 engine rebuilding when I posted. Thanks for the help...
Neil |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|