|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Wont help improve the flame front or preignition. It is good for cold starts on a car with webers(no chokes). That I can tell you first hand. Also good for low end power and emmisions too.
Kurt Williams
__________________
Never drive faster than your gaurdian angel can fly. 82 SC w/965S eng and G50 6:1 hp/w ratio 72 911t 2.6 twin plug and 72' 911t 57k orig 1 own miles 65/66 912 1 owner 76k orig 01' Aston Martin DB7 V12 Vantage Coupe 6spd |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
The best thing is to take those two sparks and put them on opposite sides of the combustion chamber -- twin plugging.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, NY
Posts: 21,140
|
Quote:
__________________
Ronin LB '77 911s 2.7 PMO E 8.5 SSI Monty MSD JPI w x6 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, NY
Posts: 21,140
|
Quote:
you know about the metro guys meet at McSorleys this Fri nite ?
__________________
Ronin LB '77 911s 2.7 PMO E 8.5 SSI Monty MSD JPI w x6 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Posts: 3,814
|
Extended spark is a good thing since it has a greater probability of lighting the mix compared to one quick discharge, but once the mix is lit the additional spark is moot.
|
||
|
|
|
|
canna change law physics
|
When Fuel control is Poor, MSD give the mixture a "2nd chance" at firing. If MSD were really helpful for modern cars, we would see it on production cars.
That said, I would replace a failed Bosh unit with an MSD, just for the cold start idle help and agreeing with CamB that it's NEW versus an old tired unit. My 2.7 with Carbs and S cams (RS Spec) will use MSD.
__________________
James The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the engineer adjusts the sails.- William Arthur Ward (1921-1994) Red-beard for President, 2020 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Second strike sounds like the classic answer to a problem that doesn't exist.
I can tell you with authority that the MSD unit on my car (69 2.0E with S pistons) makes a massive difference at idle and low rev's (<3000 RPM). As was mentioned earlier, it does not provide the benefit of 2 spark plugs, but what it does do is ensure that each cylinder does fire as opposed to occasional mis-fires. I could hardly drive the car at 2000 RPM prior to the MSD without the engine bucking. Now I can pull top gear from below 2000 RPM to redline cleanly. Granted the later cars with the flatter combustion camber are most likely not as suseptiable to this problem, but the early 2.0 cars seem to respond well to MSD's. At higher rev's (>3000 RPM) the motor runs great with or without the MSD. So what good would an extra spark do for me??? Nothing.
__________________
John '69 911E "It's a poor craftsman who blames their tools" -- Unknown "Any suspension -- no matter how poorly designed -- can be made to work reasonably well if you just stop it from moving." -- Colin Chapman Last edited by jluetjen; 01-29-2004 at 03:23 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
Thx for the post, John. Did the '69 come with the Bosch CD unit? And was it working fine before you used the MSD - or are you comapring to no CD box at all?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Yup, it had the CD box in it with the points replaced by a Crane optical trigger. Like I said, it ran fine once you were rolling at 3000 RPM and above, so I assume that the CD box was working since ignitions generally seem to fail at higher rev's first as the system's voltage starts to drop.
__________________
John '69 911E "It's a poor craftsman who blames their tools" -- Unknown "Any suspension -- no matter how poorly designed -- can be made to work reasonably well if you just stop it from moving." -- Colin Chapman |
||
|
|
|