![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
![]()
What is the single most effective upgrade to a 24 year old suspension?
__________________
86 Carrera Red/Black 80 SC Coupe Silver/Black (gone but not forgotten) |
||
![]() |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: N. Phoenix AZ USA
Posts: 28,943
|
Bilstein (or Koni) shocks.
JoeA
__________________
2013 Jag XF, 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins (the workhorse), 1992 Jaguar XJ S-3 V-12 VDP (one of only 100 examples made), 1969 Jaguar XJ (been in the family since new), 1985 911 Targa backdated to 1973 RS specs with a 3.6 shoehorned in the back, 1959 Austin Healey Sprite (former SCCA H-Prod), 1995 BMW R1100RSL, 1971 & '72 BMW R75/5 "Toaster," Ural Tourist w/sidecar, 1949 Aeronca Sedan / QB |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 456
|
Yup a set of Konis on the Cab - unbelievable difference. 18's also made a huge difference in many ways - but IMHO the Konis win.
__________________
David Cayenne Turbo - Cargraphic Stage 2 Power kit, lowering module 997 C4 Cabriolet - Basalt Black 86 Turbo Body 911 Cab - Many Mods Gone and Missed: 97 993TT: PSS9, CarGraphic Exhaust |
||
![]() |
|
Montana 911
|
Tyson
__________________
H.D. Smith 2009 997.2 S 3.8 PDK 2019 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4 Baby Raptor 2019 Can Am Renegade 1000R XC 2020 Yamaha YFZ450R |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gastonia, North Carolina
Posts: 195
|
Bilsteins
__________________
Sean '77 911S Cab Conversion |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Monroe, Louisiana
Posts: 1,340
|
all good advice.... what are your driving habits ? Koni's are the best for
some... Bilsteins are good for others. either way lowering the car made the biggest improvement for me. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,942
|
If your shocks are bad then start there.
If your shocks are good then I suggest (in order) lowering to Euro spec (don't go much lower with OEM torsion bars) sway bars torsion bars bushings Lowering is free except for the alignment. Overall except for shocks and sway bars the rest will require a realignment once it's done. So, I would group lowering, torsion bars and bushings together.
__________________
'83 SC |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
bushings ?
__________________
1974 Targa 3.6, 2001 C4 (sold), 2019 GT3RS, 2000 ML430 I repair/rebuild Bosch CDI Boxes and Porsche Motronic DMEs Porsche "Hammer" or Porsche PST2, PIWIS III - I can help!! How about a NoBadDays DualChip for 964 or '95 993 |
||
![]() |
|
Too big to fail
|
http://www.unlimitedlaps.com/
http://www.tracquest.com/ http://www.ncracing.org/ http://www.trackmasters-racing.com/
__________________
"You go to the track with the Porsche you have, not the Porsche you wish you had." '03 E46 M3 '57 356A Various VWs |
||
![]() |
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 55,975
|
I'm surprised Thom was the first to suggest seat time. It was the first thing i thought of when i saw the thread title, but first make sure the suspension/car is in good repair.
Hmm, I would suggest this in this order Great tires (they are the most important part of the car, if they suck it doesn't matter what the rest of the suspension is doing) bushings Shocks (I second or third the Bilstein vote) Lower, Corner balance, and alignment Lots of seat time (learn to drive the thing) and these last two are hotly debated, so they are in no particular order Sway bars Torsion Bars
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
Quote:
Also, there are track people who will push the "stiffer is better" . . if that is your ultimate goal, save yourself some headache and buy a go-kart, and kick some tracked-911 butt . . .just don't drive it on the street (it will rattle your brain loose) IMO, those Porsche engineers got the balance of the components right . . .for a street car. So, like masraum said; make sure the suspension/car is in good repair. If, however, your 911 has the stock US ride height, then lowering will be by far the single most effective suspension upgrade. (The suspension design intent was sacrificed to the bumper gods, circa 1980) Of course, with lowering, your bumper-height may nolonger adhere to the laws of 1980. (oh darn) ![]()
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Thanks for the replies! I know I need much improvement myself. I autocross as often as I can. As far as I know, the entire suspension is 24 years old and stock and most likely a little worn out. Just looking for the most bang for my buck right now to get it at least to where it was 24 years ago and then some.
Sounds like seat time and new shocks are the way to go for now.
__________________
86 Carrera Red/Black 80 SC Coupe Silver/Black (gone but not forgotten) |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
Define "most effective" - do you include cost? If not, shocks. Tires aren't really part of the suspension; otherwise them too.
If cost is included (and you provide the labor), then you need to replace every single piece of rubber in that worn, stiff 24 year old suspension -- and that includes the top F shock mounts. For the street, use stock rubber, or Elephant's bearings. Search the forum. |
||
![]() |
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
Also, shocks are pretty easy to replace relative to other cars.
On the SC, the top nut on the rear shocks are kinda hard to get at because of the CIS and airbox assembly. Other than that they are straightforward. Fronts are a bit stubborn but easily doable with a couple big pipe wrenches and two people. The bang for the buck is good when it comes to shocks. Noticeable improvement instantly. And probably desperately needed after 24 years. The two front shock jobs i've done (86 & 87 Carreras) had worn out shocks that were amazingly soft. The amount of damping left in them was very minimal. One other thing that wasn't mentioned is tie rods. The Turbo tie rod upgrade/replacement is a good improvement. Makes the steering nice and tight again. Also a good thing because you are forced to feel the improvement every time you drive the car.
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Centennial, CO, USA
Posts: 1,405
|
Counter to the rest of you, I would say torsion bars. Changing up from stock sizes made all the difference for me on my '72. I already upgraded my dampers (shocks) to Bilsteins but the effect of stiffer spring rates reduced my body roll, along with same time lowering. My sways are stock but I do have a good front strut brace. HTH.
__________________
Bill '72 911T-2.4S MFI Vintage Racer(heart out), '80 911SC Weissach,'95.5 S6 Avant Wunderwagen & 2005 997 C2S new ride. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
86 Carrera Red/Black 80 SC Coupe Silver/Black (gone but not forgotten) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: AZ
Posts: 8,414
|
Lower CG and less overall weight.
|
||
![]() |
|