![]() |
|
|
|
Gon fix it with me hammer
|
variocam on non variocam engine
has anybody seen this guy
http://www.928sg.com/heads.htm he took a 928 , and wacked on 968 heads, with Variocam on it just an idea, but , how feasable would it be to wack on 911 Variocam heads on an older engine? - more low end torque - no more valve adjustments dunno what else comes into play on this... anybody else has an idea? what kind and amount of improvements to expect?
__________________
Stijn Vandamme EX911STARGA73EX92477EX94484EX944S8890MPHPINBALLMACHINEAKAEX987C2007 BIMDIESELBMW116D2019 Last edited by svandamme; 08-03-2004 at 11:39 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
um, not feasible. 996 heads on air cooled bottom would be really super hard. GT3 heads and cylinders on an air cooled case would probably be feasible (definitely with 964+ case), but then you have a GT3 engine anyway.
956 heads on our engines would also be possible (not variocam), but $$$ in all cases you need water cooling in the car. I guess the question is, why would you want to? Note that the 928 and 944/968 engines share many parts, not the same relationship as 911/996.
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Gon fix it with me hammer
|
didn't 993's have variocam as well??
those are still aircooled don't know about size of heads or anything else though why would i want to? dunno , just theorizing about what can or can't be done , not even sure if i'de ever do it... maybe the advantage of vario cam is just 1% more torque dunno .. there must be some use for the design if they keep using it on the new cars?
__________________
Stijn Vandamme EX911STARGA73EX92477EX94484EX944S8890MPHPINBALLMACHINEAKAEX987C2007 BIMDIESELBMW116D2019 Last edited by svandamme; 08-03-2004 at 12:49 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Go Speedracer, go!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,951
|
993s have varioRAM, not varioCAM.
__________________
1981 SC ROW Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
It would take some enterprising and inventive person to add a mechanism onto the sprocket end of the cam to automatically advance/retard the timing. I think it's been done on 924/944 engines (?) and several domestic big blocks.
Variocam though is variable lift too. That would require some nifty re-engineering of the rocker arm/cam housing and camshaft lobes. Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
Quote:
WRT to the variocam there is lots you can do with an air cooled motor that does more for power/torque. the new motors have the old ones beat on power/economy etc but what are you gonna do?
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
I just read the site and he actually modified his 928 heads to take a 968 variocam cam-to-cam chain tensioner. Just want to be clear so others don't think you can slap 2 968 heads on a 928 (well, maybe you can, but this guy didn't).
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|