![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lake Tahoe
Posts: 28
|
SC vs carrera choice?
I am looking to buy my first 911 and realise that I can get a nice sc for less than a carrera. I understand the differences (generally). Will I truly notice a vast difference between these two models if I am not a daredevil driver. I want to have some fun in the car, enjoy its performance, and push it a little when safe. Through your experience, what will be the major differences I will notice on a daly basis, not on paper.
Thanks! Jon |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chalfont Pa
Posts: 1,548
|
Almost none!
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,631
|
I think the most noticeable difference is the G50 transmission vs the 915 in the SC. Do some fun searches on "G50 vs 915". Also the fuel injection is different and really much better than the SC, I think.
In general the carrera is more refined than the SC; quieter, smoother, more options, faster, electronics, etc. Be disciplined and drive at least 1 of each; you'll be glad you did. Jack
__________________
Warren Hall (Early S Man), 1950 - 2008 ------------------------------------ 2006 Tri D675 Scorched Yellow 2006 Ducati Sport Classic mono SOLD 1979 SCWDP #0020 Talbot Yellow SOLD |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I think the Motronic injection is supposed to be much more reliable than CIS. The Carreras will also have a lot of updates included that will need to be added to the SC. Having said that, nonetheless buy the one that's in the best shape.
Scott
__________________
1988 Porsche 944 Turbo S 70,000 1987 Porsche 911 107k (sold) 1982 Mercedes 240D 4-Speed (mileage unknown) 1998 Mercedes E300 Turbodiesel 147,000 (sold) 1985 Mercedes 300D 227,000 (sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Buy an SC...
__________________
Porsche-Less at the moment.... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tucson
Posts: 914
|
Quote:
__________________
1986 Carrera Coupe 1999 Chevy Tahoe 1987 Chevy Blazer 1955 Chevy Apache 3100 Pickup "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NOVA
Posts: 91
|
I have owned an 80 SC for over 2 years. I think the only part that bugs me is that I'd like a few ammenties that come with a newer car, not the least of which is air conditioning that actually cools me off on hot days.
__________________
Rich Franco Northern Virginia 1980 911 SC Targa |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oakland, CA.
Posts: 602
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
RETIRED
|
Get the best you can find.....do a PPI and then drive the Fuchs off of it.....
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Drive a couple of examples of both. That'll answer your question.
__________________
'85 Defender 90 V8 Station Wagon (mine), ‘16 Mini Cooper S Countryman All4, ‘79 Mini Moke Californian (hers). '83 SC Coupe SOLD '96 Carrera 4 Coupe SOLD '89 Carrera Targa SOLD |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
The CIS fuel injection in a 3.0 SC is going to be liability long term even though it is a reliable system.
You are better off with motronic Carrera 3.2 If it were me, I'd buy an SC and use the difference on upgrades, but then I have a disease
__________________
-Todd '82 911 SC Coupe w/'92 3.6L, bulletproofed 915/62 w/GT LSD & Wevo goodness, Rennsport RSR/Bilstein Sport, SRP ARB, ER Polybronze, BK strut brace, 15x7/8" Fuchs. Sold: 92 964 Turbo, 81 SC, 96 993 Coupe, 82 SC, 89 Carrera Cabriolete |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Carlos, CA US
Posts: 5,521
|
The carrera is not much better in the AC department, same old design.
The Motronic is not more reliable, just easier to work on. THe SC is less expensive but costs just as much to fix. For sure, buy the one with fewer issues.
__________________
Porsche 2005 GT3, 2006 997S with bore-scoring Exotic: Ferrari F360F1 TDF, Ferrari 328 GTS Disposable Car: BMW 530xiT, 2008 Mini Cooper S Two-wheel art: Ducati 907IE, Ducati 851 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
Quote:
CIS (911SC) have better throttle response than a Motronic system --the Motronic is better on fuel consumption and runs cleaner-- as it more controlled (cmptr) fuel dynamics.
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loxahatchee, florida
Posts: 2,894
|
get the newest one you can afford. every year had improvements. As far as cis vs efi. I have both an 85 carrera with efi and an 88 turbo with cis. I F%$#% HATE CIS. Cant wait till i can install efi on the turbo.
__________________
88 turbo Guards red Targa slant nose, and yes I am a horsepower junkie, 3.4liter,7.5 to 1 JE pistons, Adjustable WUR, Imagine fuel head, 1 bar waste gate headers,allthe cis toys. Now apart to become the next EFI monster. fabbing my own intake, headers Individual throttle bodies, MS-3, pauter rods, Xtreme twin plugged heads, gt-2 evo cams cop's. 2019 Silverado 6.2L |
||
![]() |
|
Registered Usurper
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,824
|
If you want the lighter of the two, buy an SC.
If you want more amenities, buy a Carrera. If you want a more raw, visceral feel, buy an SC. If you want a bit more sophication, buy a Carrera (chassis & suspension are the same for both cars though). If you want better gas mileage, buy a Carrera. If CIS reliability concerns you, buy a Carrera (my CIS has been going strong for 194k miles). If you want to do heavy engine mods, buy a Carrera. If you're leary about developing a rapport with the 915 trans (a perfectly respectable transmission and a delight to shift for those who find them a delight to shift), buy a late model Carrera with the easier shifting, stronger, heavier and more expensive to rebuild G50 trans. If you want what is frequently referred to as a "bullet-proof" motor, buy an SC. If you don't want to possibly have to add pop-off valve, turbo tie rods and Carrera chain tensioners to an SC that hasn't had these mods, buy a carrera. FWIW, I was shopping for both and bought an SC because I like the raw and visceral thing, and lower weight. I'll wager that the model you'll be happiest with is......Whichever of the two you decide to buy! (SCs are more fun to drive ![]()
__________________
'82 SC RoW coupe Last edited by DARISC; 06-20-2007 at 06:05 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,631
|
Barrpete's right wrt when the G50 kicked in. Sorry to be misleading.
I think the reason SC drivers are so vocal about their love for the car is that it balances the raw, light, driving fun of an early 911 with the reliability of the new ones. I've never heard that the CIS throttle response is better than the Motronic, but there you are. Join the 911 club. Either way you won't be sorry. But if you go SC, you may just be able to dominate the world: SC Owners - POLL for new SCWDP designs & #2 poll Can't say that about a Carrera...Jack
__________________
Warren Hall (Early S Man), 1950 - 2008 ------------------------------------ 2006 Tri D675 Scorched Yellow 2006 Ducati Sport Classic mono SOLD 1979 SCWDP #0020 Talbot Yellow SOLD |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Yeah, what DARISC said... Plus, as an added bonus, if you buy an SC, you will then be aligned with the SCWDP and be able to proudly where the logo and/or display it on your car, such as one of these:
![]()
__________________
Shane - 1984 928S |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I think you guys are confusing CIS vs. Motronic with the fact that the 3.0L has a shorter stroke.
And it isn't that the CIS isn't reliable, it's that new CIS parts are unobtanium.
__________________
-Todd '82 911 SC Coupe w/'92 3.6L, bulletproofed 915/62 w/GT LSD & Wevo goodness, Rennsport RSR/Bilstein Sport, SRP ARB, ER Polybronze, BK strut brace, 15x7/8" Fuchs. Sold: 92 964 Turbo, 81 SC, 96 993 Coupe, 82 SC, 89 Carrera Cabriolete |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
As was said in another thread not too long ago..."every SC wishes it was a Carerra"....also, don't let them tell you the SC stands for Super Carerra, that is false information....it really stands for Subpar Carerra...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() All kidding aside... Personally, I'm very happy with my '86 Carerra. It was the last year for the 915 transmission, which I've had no problems with *knock on wood*. It has the 3.2, larger air conditioner vents and other nice conveniences. The longer I have the car the more I appreciate it.
__________________
Mark '86 911 Coupe - Now FOR SALE...Less than 60,000 original miles...Prussian Blue |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Langley,B.C.
Posts: 12,000
|
I have owned three of each......
Perfromance wise, on the street there is little to tell between a 3.0 and a 3.2. (save it for one of the other many threads out there) However, as someone who gets paid occasionally to look into problems with 911's, I can say that with a multimeter and a manual you can trouble shoot a 3.2. Not so with a 3.0. Personally I am not a big fan of CIS, though I do not hate it. If you are chosing between an 83 cis car and an 84 motronic car, take the one that is in better overall condition. The pro/con debate of cis/motronic really only comes into play if one of the cars is not running properly. Cheers
__________________
Turn3 Autosport- Full Service and Race Prep www.turn3autosport.com 997 S 4.0, Cayman S 3.8, Cayenne Turbo, Macan Turbo, 69 911, Mini R53 JCW , RADICAL SR3 |
||
![]() |
|