|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the radar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
|
Quote:
__________________
Gordon ___________________________________ '71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed #56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage |
||
|
|
|
|
AutoBahned
|
there is a list based on year and model - get a copy of the list from the agency
|
||
|
|
|
|
Jack
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 395
|
I think the list changes from county to county. I don't dyno test, havent done the evap test. The only thing they do is shove the sniffer up the tailpipe, and do a visual inspection. Who knows, maybe that will change with time...
-Jack
__________________
85 Carrera Cab |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Does having "classic plates" exempt the car from a smog test?
__________________
Ray H. 1979 911SC Coupe 2000 986 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Perhaps not....although I met someone recently with a Euro 930 that said they got him exemption.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Interesting. I have considered getting them as well, but I didn't think I can live with the restrictions when the car could be driven.
__________________
Ray H. 1979 911SC Coupe 2000 986 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Here are my results from last April:
idle: HC: Max 120, Avg 37, measured 35 CO: Max 1.0, Avg .10, measured .07 2500 RPM: HC: Max 150, Avg 31, measured 18 CO: Max 1.20, Avg .20, measured .27 It's interesting how the Max & Avg varies from one test location to another... Ken
__________________
Ken 06 Cayman S - gone 85 911 Targa - gone back home to Germany 73.5 911T Targa - long gone... Founder ncPOG: nevada county Porsche Owners Group - disbanded post covid after 15 yrs |
||
|
|
|
|
RETIRED
|
For the hearing impaired, CA classic plates do NOT exempt you from smog tests. The plate restricts use, cost more with no added benefit.
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: N. Phoenix AZ USA
Posts: 28,967
|
Here in AZ it does. You also have to have it insured as a classic or historic car.
__________________
2021 Subaru Legacy, 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins (the workhorse), 1992 Jaguar XJ S-3 V-12 VDP (one of only 100 examples made), 1969 Jaguar XJ (been in the family since new), 1985 911 Targa backdated to 1973 RS specs with a 3.6 shoehorned in the back, 1959 Austin Healey Sprite (former SCCA H-Prod), 1995 BMW R1100RSL, 1971 & '72 BMW R75/5 "Toaster," Ural Tourist w/sidecar, 1949 Aeronca Sedan / QB |
||
|
|
|
|
RETIRED
|
Maybe so, but it's CA. Consider the source.....
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Again, I'd say probably not, but I know someone who recently found otherwise.
I'm NOT hearing impaired. |
||
|
|
|
|
RETIRED
|
Cool yer jets, Rocketboy....it was a joke.
The only way you are exempt in California is if it's a home built ride, has one of the 500 a year special construction permits OR is older than the 1976 model year.
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Under the radar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
|
Ab 2289
Anybody read the latest nonsense? Cal bill AB 2289. Can anyone explain what it will mean to us.
Maybe someone from CARB or BAR or whatever they call themselves is a Pelican and can explain this.
__________________
Gordon ___________________________________ '71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed #56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage Last edited by Trackrash; 08-28-2010 at 07:06 AM.. |
||
|
|
|