![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,067
|
That's what I was thinking...how do the hoses get routed?
__________________
1984 Targa |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 977
|
![]() Quote:
CAREFULLY LOOK AT THE LOW SIDE AND HIGH SIDE GAS PRESSURES!!! AND THE AIR VENT TEMP GAUGE!!! the hoses, fittings, hose clamps, front fan etc., used are only for temporary test use to prove this works or not The round coaxial fan you see was hand placed without sealing over where the OEM squirrel cage fan goes so it had a blower on the front PFC notice the clip on leads in the picture Sorry, I am not going to address your question "you have two 10 foot hoses in a temporary hookup to reverse the condenser order" here and let people just figure it out from the clues I gave; but I will call you Last edited by KelogGes; 03-30-2015 at 02:59 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Do the numbers....
Front condenser, 22X6" 132 sq. inch. Average airflow, 110 FPM. Factory condenser, blower. 60 airflow measurements, 3 measurements each inch across. Rear condenser, 800 RPM engine idle, 27.5X8.5" 233 sq. inch. Average airflow 150 FPM. Anomaly: No measureable airflow for the first 10" of front condenser from battery side, peak measurement was 430 FPM at 11" Conclusion: rear condenser is 240% more effective at heat transfer vs the front lip condenser. "Boosted" rear condenser airflow using the cabin heat blower = 186 FPM. Cabin heat blower airflow inlet is open to atmosphere and sleeved for increased "work". Last edited by wwest; 03-31-2015 at 09:39 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Park Ridge, IL
Posts: 1,240
|
Thanks, Reid. I am having a hard time reading the pressures, but have no doubt that they are excellent.
West, There is no reason that both your improvement and Reid's could not work together. You may remember that I use your cabin/engine blower whenever the a/c is active. I also have two 8" condenser fans on the rear deck. Reid, because I have a lot invested in my current system, I will continue to work with it for a while. I am interested in your arrangement, but have not quite committed to it yet. Thanks, Dave
__________________
Dave McKenzie 1984 Carrera 3.2 1984 928S Automatic 2001 996TT |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Last edited by wwest; 03-30-2015 at 05:27 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 977
|
DaveMcKenz
words of wisdom and experience Extra Rear Deck Fans are never needed YOU HAVE A HUGE 911 ENGINE FAN that will pull the balls off a goat Seal your rear deck lid condenser so it is COMPLETELY sealed to the rear deck lid and let the engine do the work with its fan! toss the useless fans you added, or give them to wwest to sell to some unsuspecting numskull LoL Last edited by KelogGes; 03-30-2015 at 05:22 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Quote:
You appear to be the sole exception. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 977
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KelogGes View Post DaveMcKenz words of wisdom and experience Extra Rear Deck Fans are never needed YOU HAVE A HUGE 911 ENGINE FAN that will pull the balls off a goat Yes, 3000 RPM and above...! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I never said this Seal your rear deck lid condenser so it is COMPLETELY sealed to the rear deck lid and let the engine do the work with its fan! [QUOTE=wwest;8554467]/QUOTE] Extra Rear Deck Fans are never needed YOU HAVE A HUGE 911 ENGINE FAN that will pull the balls off a goat "Yes, 3000 RPM and above...!" Seal your rear deck lid condenser so it is COMPLETELY sealed to the rear deck lid and let the engine do the work with its fan! warning wwest STOP PUTTING YOUR WORDS IN ANY MESSAGE AGAIN TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE I SAID THEM OR WE CAN GO TO COURT IN A LAW SUITE YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED! FOR THE LAST TIME Last edited by KelogGes; 03-30-2015 at 06:14 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
[QUOTE=KelogGes;8554484]
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 977
|
|||
![]() |
|
El Duderino
|
![]()
__________________
There are those who call me... Tim '83 911 SC 3.0 coupe (NA) You can't buy happiness, but you can buy car parts which is kind of the same thing. Last edited by tirwin; 03-30-2015 at 06:25 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
|||
![]() |
|
winter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vail
Posts: 1,674
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 977
|
OK
I know who are and where you live I looked you up before you were easy to find |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 8,559
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 977
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 977
|
![]() Quote:
Dave is starting to get this this using his brain use your brain and think about reversing the gases this is not about necessarily using my PFC''s the pictures I posted are proof this works far better than the traditional way figure it out in your brain Doing this makes an incredible difference for several reasons |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
"words of wisdom and experience Extra Rear Deck Fans are never needed YOU HAVE A HUGE 911 ENGINE FAN that will pull the balls off a goat Seal your rear deck lid condenser so it is COMPLETELY sealed to the rear deck lid and let the engine do the work with its fan! toss the useless fans you added, or give them to wwest to sell to some unsuspecting numskull LoL" wwest's statement: "Do the numbers.... Front condenser, 22X6" 132 sq. inch. Average airflow, 110 FPM. Factory condenser, blower. 60 airflow measurements, 3 measurements each inch across. Rear condenser, 800 RPM engine idle, 27.5X8.5" 233 sq. inch. Average airflow 150 FPM. Anomaly: No measureable airflow for the first 10" of front condenser from battery side, peak measurement was 430 FPM at 11" Conclusion: rear condenser is 240% more effective at heat transfer vs the front lip condenser. "Boosted" rear condenser airflow using the cabin heat blower = 186 FPM. Cabin heat blower airflow inlet is open to atmosphere and sleeved for increased "work"." KeloGes is correct, the engine cooling fan will pull the balls off of a goat. With the engine RPM at or above 2500 RPM. FACT: The factory stock rear lid condenser is 240% more effective at cooling the refrigerant vs the front lip condenser. From the numbers it is quite clear that rerouting the refrigerant flow to the front lip condenser first would yeild no A/C performance gain whatsoever. So KeloGes's brilliant idea turns out to be nothing more than a SHAM, putup! It's pretty clear that the least expensive & complex method, most elegant method, for improving the performance of our A/C is to add cooling airflow through the rear lid condenser, be it Spal fans or simply engaging the cabin heat blower. (or both??) The latter can be done selectively in the '84-88 models, or direct connection to a trinary switch. In worse case switched on with the A/C as with the front lip blower. Switching fans on with compressor clutch power is not the best of ideas since the high pressure remains for quite some time post compressor shut down. Last edited by wwest; 03-31-2015 at 09:38 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Many complaints about the direction of this thread from fellow Pelicans. This thread has run its course.
Mark at Pelican Parts |
||
![]() |
|