![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
I guess my observation was about an hour late; somebody else got there earlier.
I wrote: "It might suffice to say (or add a caption to the chart) that the piston is closest to the valves during the overlap period (end of exhaust, beginning of intake) and piston is at TDC." and Wayne responded: " ..... that's not correct! As the graph shows, at TDC, the valves may not be closest to the pistons. It's on the upward stroke that they are closest (of course, it depends upon the camshaft). That's the point I'm trying to make here - that the TDC point is *NOT* where you have to worry about interference! " Wayne, I'm trying to understand what you're saying. If the piston is indeed on it's upward stroke (not near TDC), then there is no way BOTH valves will be closest to the piston. The only time BOTH valves are open is during the overlap period as the ex. valve is closing and the intake valve is beginning to open. If you're referring to one valve. becoming closer, i.e. the exhaust valve, yes, as the chart points out, the exh. valve-to-piston clearance narrows, but is especially critical as the piston approaches TDC. Likewise, during the intake stroke, the in. valve begins to open while the piston is moving up the cylinder. The further away from TDC, the greater the valve-to-piston clearance you will have, and conversely the valve-to-piston clearance decreases the closer the piston is to TDC. With difference camshaft profiles this could be different, but in general terms that's what happens. A cutaway of a Porsche cylinder going through a 4-stroke cycle would tell us exactly what's going on but I suspect it's like most other 4-stroke cycle engines. We might be splitting hairs with the number of crank degrees vs actual piston location in the cylinder. The crank rotates quite a bit while the piston is around TDC. Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Africa
Posts: 94
|
Some comments (its early in the AM so forgive me if these are a little incoherent)
The comments on scale (to show that the piston travelled farther than the valves) made sense to me when I read it but now on version 2 there is too much dead space at the bottom of the graph The clearance graphic doesn't make that much sense to me. It isn't clear from the graph why you have put it where you have. Maybe you could add a third line to show piston to valve clearance as it varies with the degrees of rotation You could also add small diagrams showing the piston and valve in a cylinder at critical points - this may be overkill for your target audience though And my two cents worth about the valves on top or bottom discussion - they should be on the side. Isn't the book about Porsches - horizontal engines - LOL |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea.
Posts: 37,759
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Second version is much better but, the degree markings could be confusing to those less knowledgeable. The current diagram has crankshaft degrees at both the bottom and top, I think it would be better to place camshaft degrees along the top near the valves to give folks a better understanding of cam timing. This would also help folks understand how retarding or advancing a cam could cause piston to valve clearance issues. As an aside this graph could also be used to describe how valve float from an over rev condition can cause the valves to hit the pistons.
|
||
![]() |
|
Irrationally exuberant
|
I think you're d**m lucky to get any graph at all sonny. In my day...
-Chris |
||
![]() |
|
Author of "101 Projects"
|
The suggestions about camshaft degrees at the top is a good one. Also good may be a third line showing piston to valve clearance.
Sherwood, the point where the piston is closest to one of the valves is not at TDC. It's actually before TDC, because the valve is still open quite a bit. Contrary to popular belief, when you over-rev and your valves hit the pistons, it's not happening at TDC. At TDC, there is quite a bit of clearance, as the valves are almost completely closed. It's when the piston is coming up towards the valves, and they are still open where the clearance problem is. I have a whole section in the book dedicated to checking this... -Wayne
__________________
Wayne R. Dempsey, Founder, Pelican Parts Inc., and Author of: 101 Projects for Your BMW 3-Series • 101 Projects for Your Porsche 911 • How to Rebuild & Modify Porsche 911 Engines • 101 Projects for Your Porsche Boxster & Cayman • 101 Projects for Your Porsche 996 / 997 • SPEED READ: Porsche 911 Check out our new site: Dempsey Motorsports |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: montreal, Canada
Posts: 337
|
This suggestion will overlap some of the others made, but perhaps having 2 of the clearance arrows: 1) clearance is smallest here 2) clearance is greatest here, or 2) This is clearance at TDC, etc . . .
Look forward to buying the book. Michel Richard |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
if you want show over rev, when the valves float, do something like. . .
![]() . . .of course this is *if* the valves go thru the pistons ![]()
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Good idea, Island.
Wayne, I'd include all four strokes of the engine.
__________________
Mark Szabo 1986 911 Targa 3.2 (I will miss you) 1985 Scirocco 8V (I will not miss you) 1986 Dodge B150 Ram Van (I can't believe I got $200 for you) 1987 Escort 5-speed 1.9 RIP |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,753
|
Wayne,
How about something like this?
__________________
gary |
||
![]() |
|
Author of "101 Projects"
|
That's not bad Gary, but it portrays the wrong message. The distance at TDC is *not* what you need to worry about...
Hmm, let me think about this some more... It's not an easy thing to convey... -Wayne
__________________
Wayne R. Dempsey, Founder, Pelican Parts Inc., and Author of: 101 Projects for Your BMW 3-Series • 101 Projects for Your Porsche 911 • How to Rebuild & Modify Porsche 911 Engines • 101 Projects for Your Porsche Boxster & Cayman • 101 Projects for Your Porsche 996 / 997 • SPEED READ: Porsche 911 Check out our new site: Dempsey Motorsports |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
I really like Garys choice of colors for the valve paths, and the addition of closed valves at the end points. . . .I don't think he was too focused on the accuracy of the sinewaves.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,753
|
OK then, to de-emphasize TDC clearance which is not the issue, would you want to empahsize max intake lift clearance or some generic timing as shown here?
__________________
gary |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Africa
Posts: 94
|
Small point - you may want to caption it MINIMUM valve clearance
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|