![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
911 SC 915 short ratio diff options ?
Hello all,
I am considering installing a short ratio crown wheel and pinion. My target is in increase the mid range torque characteristics on a 911 SC with a 3,2 engine. We are not interested in top speed, but this is not a race car, so something in between would be nice. The car is driven alot on narrow hillclimbs What options do we have for the 915 gearbox ? 7.31 ? 8.31 ? 8.35 ? Any ideas ? Thanx |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
tire sizes year of the transmission rev limit is cruising rpm an issue in general 7:31 w/ a stock SC is going to be very short and 8:35 will be intermediate between stock and 7:31 but closer to the 7:31. The drops of course are unaffected by cwp or tire changes for an 80-83 RoW w/ 245/45 x16 tires top speed stock 7:31 ~139 8:35 ~141 8:31 ~159
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,313
|
A bunch of years ago we had our '84 trans w/8:31 converted to a 7:31 with the addition of a early 5th gear (not sure what year). This coupled to a 3.2 w/Steve Wong chip, SSI's and sport muffler. Swapping out the r&p made a huge difference at the bottom end, and up through the mid range. A great improvement coming out of slow corners at the track. The early 5th gear keeps the motor in the 3200 rpm range at 75-80 mph, using 245/45/16's on the rear. This set up is now in my VW bus and works great for the street.
__________________
Harold '79 930/DP935 (sold) '68 VW 3.3 Turbo Crewcab |
||
![]() |
|
Under the radar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
|
__________________
Gordon ___________________________________ '71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed #56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage |
||
![]() |
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,539
|
Thanks for bringing my attention to that 8:35 thread. Mbe posted some inaccurate infirmation I had not previously seen.
|
||
![]() |
|