|
|
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,527
|
right or wrong?
"I even approve upgrading from 2.4 to 2.7 because you can go back to original pistons & cylinders. Cutting off original rear fender is not reversible - it's a permanent loss. "
The above was posted on another board. Silly me, I always thought a 2.4 case had to be machined to accept the larger 2.7 p&c set...one reason I never did it. So, what's the story? |
||
11-20-2002, 01:32 PM
|
|
|
Friend of Warren
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 16,492
|
Ok was this Ian or Tabby that posted that bit of drivel?
__________________
Kurt V No more Porsches, but a revolving number of motorcycles. |
||
|
11-20-2002, 01:38 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: TX USA
Posts: 9,804
|
Paul ... just as you suspected, after a 2.4 case is opened up from 92 mm spigots to 97 mm for the 90 mm 2.7 Nikasils ... there isn't much 'shelf' space left to support 2.4 84 mm cylinders! Definitely NOT reversible!
__________________
Warren Hall, Jr. 1973 911S Targa ... 'Annie' 1968 340S Barracuda ... 'Rolling Thunder' |
||
|
11-20-2002, 01:45 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,527
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11-20-2002, 02:00 PM
|
|
