| 
								 | 
							
								
  | 
							
								
  | 
						
								
  | 
						
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2011 
				Location: Long Beach, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 381
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Thanks for sharing David. John is a great guy! Really passionate about the business and helping others. He's making a Sudebaker that's unreal..monster twin turbo V8.
		 
		
	
		
	
			
				
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1975 911S - Twin-plugged 3.5L www.rasantproducts.com  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	|||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1981 911SC restomod "Minerva" 2004 Boxster S 2021 Cayman GTS 4.0 manual "Olive" 2014 Cayenne GTS V8 (wife's lover) The slope is not slippery; in fact it is entirely frictionless.  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2011 
				Location: Long Beach, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 381
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Evan9eleven sorry I missed this! Thanks for the reminder. 
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			The base map has been set with my 2.7L with the stock CIS, and I'm dialing in a set of PMO ITB's at the moment. The ITB setup seems to be the focus of my customers, and the maps for this are quite different than the stock CIS manifold. The main changes you should expect to make will be VE (volumetric efficiency) and ignition timing. I'm creating a tutorial as part of the kit installation document that will outline my tuning method. To give a brief overview: -VE is straight forward using the AEM software. You will do a pull using the base map, and it will tell you what you're new VE values should be. Depending on how far off the initial values are you may need to do a few iterations of this table. -Ignition timing is a bit more involved for the tuner. Typically this is done by ear or some knock sensing device (knock ears, knock sensor, ridged wire connected to the engine to feel vibration, etc). This is somewhat of a controversial debate. Personally I tune by ear, and tune the high RPM/high load points on a dyno. There are many shops out there that will support a few dyno runs for a reasonable fee (~$100). Let me know if there are any other questions you have. Feel free to shoot me a PM or email for pricing at Andrew@rasantproducts.com 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1975 911S - Twin-plugged 3.5L www.rasantproducts.com  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2011 
				Location: Long Beach, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 381
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Wanted to share some exciting news with the fellow Pelicans, the Rasant Engine Management system is now up and running on a set of 46mm PMO ITB's! The combination of this Engine Management kit with ITB's has completely transformed the otherwise stock 2.7L. Throttle response, acceleration, and sound are as if it's a completely new engine. 
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			![]() With these installed on my engine it offers a much better baseline calibration for those who want to install with either ITB's or the stock intake manifold. Either route is sure to please! I will upload more photos and dyno data soon with the ITB setup. We have our introductory offer extending to the end of the year. Please email me for pricing on your vehicle. Best regards, Andrew Darud Andrew@rasantproducts.com 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1975 911S - Twin-plugged 3.5L www.rasantproducts.com  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Thanks for the reply Andrew. The ITB setup looks awesome, can't wait to see the data on it. I just sent you an email so we can talk pricing and details. Cheers!  
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			 
		
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1981 911SC restomod "Minerva" 2004 Boxster S 2021 Cayman GTS 4.0 manual "Olive" 2014 Cayenne GTS V8 (wife's lover) The slope is not slippery; in fact it is entirely frictionless.  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
 
 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 1999 
				
				
				
					Posts: 944
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			46mm carburetors would drown a 2.7.  I'm impressed! 
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			Anxious to see the data. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	R Gruppe #111 Early S Registry #235 res ipsa loquitur  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2004 
				Location: Woking, McLaren-land 
				
				
					Posts: 681
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			That certainly looks good!  Is there any loss in low-midrange with the ITBs? Hopefully your dyno plot shows before and after
		 
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Shirish 1987 Carrera, Granite Green  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2011 
				Location: Long Beach, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 381
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Thanks guys! Yes, the 46mm ITB's probably aren't ideal on a 2.7L.. The next build started that would really showcase the Engine Management System (ITB's on a twin-plug 3.5L). While waiting on cams the ITB's went on my 2.7L . Here's a sneak peak of the new build: 
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			![]() Even the 46mm ITB's are working very well on the 2.7L. There's a small amount of lag when going WOT at very low RPM's but I'm working on tuning to improve it. Everything above ~2000RPM is improved and that's with minimal tuning time. This is really a testament to the capability of the Infinity ECU. Very interested to see the dyno data as well! Andrew 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1975 911S - Twin-plugged 3.5L www.rasantproducts.com  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Engine bay temps. 
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			As Sal stated, its almost ambient in the engine bay during running. At full speed the fan is drawing in 1500 liters of air every SECOND!! It sure gets hotter when you shut down, but then the ECU isn't on so it will handle higher temperatures. I have had my ECU in the engine bay for almost 10 years now, not the infinity but Emerald, byt I think that translates to basicly any system. Its way cooler in an aircooled enginebay than in a convensional car. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration.  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2011 
				Location: Long Beach, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 381
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Safe, it's completely up to the end user if they would like to place it in the engine compartment. I certainly understand your points, and don't see an issue during operation. It's only a risk in the case when the engine is shutoff and heat soaks the engine compartment.  
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	I'm only sharing my opinion. With the cost of an ECU it's not worth the risk (to me).  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2004 
				Location: Ottawa 
				
				
					Posts: 325
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Subscribed !
		 
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Gilles... ------------------------------------ 1970 Targa 911T  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Are you using MAP or TP for your fuel table with the new ITB?   When speaking with the guys at AEM they recommended TP as the primary and MAP as secondary for elevation when going ITB. 
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	David  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Very interesting, I was/am debating the CIS/carb/EFI options on my 2.7. Once I do a leak down test I'll do an SC grind cam swap and start the final steps on induction.  
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			I'll shoot you a mail for detail$, with my fingers crossed the leak down is good. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	'73 2.0 914 (2.8 /6 conversion in progress) '64 356SC '65 Ducati Falcon 80 ‘19 Audi SQ5  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 I would rather be driving 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2000 
				Location: Austin, TX 
				
				
					Posts: 9,108
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 You are very correct that the fuel requirements and map/table shape for common plenum and ITB are very different. Amazing what good resonance tuning can do. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Jamie - I can explain it to you. But I can not understand it for you. 71 911T SWT - Sun and Fun Mobile 72 911T project car. "Minne" - A tangy version of tangerine #projectminne classicautowerks.com - EFI conversion parts and suspension setups. IG Classicautowerks  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2011 
				Location: Long Beach, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 381
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Hi David, good to hear from you! I started tuning by MAP alone which of course was erratic on the transients. Then I started including TPS compensation for enrichment/fuel cut on throttle transients (very easy to do with the AEM Infinity). This seemed to work well. 
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			I was also suggested to try tuning by TPS. I updated my tune and have been running this configuration for about a week, and it seems to be marginally better than the MAP + TPS compensation. It could still use some refinement however. I will keep trying both configurations and report my findings. That's a good point about elevation. I'll have to take it up to the mountains one of these weekends to see if one prevails. Nathan, thanks for the email! Hope to work with you on your 2.7L + ITB's. I'm sure you'll be happy with the results. Thanks Jamie! That explanation helps quite a bit. I can improve data log frequency by logging on a USB memory stick, rather than the PC. It would be interesting to see if that helps narrow in what portion of the maps will address the lean tip-in. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1975 911S - Twin-plugged 3.5L www.rasantproducts.com  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Andrew, reading this thread has really got me interested in EFI again though I must admit I am a novice and still at the stage of gathering information and trying to understand what challenges I might face with doing the swap. As I mentioned in a previous post the tuning aspect is a concern for me though it sounds like you have this covered.  
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			In reading ddifferent sites on the web and posts here on Pelican, I've come across a lot of differing views and solutions. Could you help me to understand the differences between your kit and the other options on the market? Thanks!  
		
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1981 911SC restomod "Minerva" 2004 Boxster S 2021 Cayman GTS 4.0 manual "Olive" 2014 Cayenne GTS V8 (wife's lover) The slope is not slippery; in fact it is entirely frictionless.  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered User 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2015 
				Location: Honolulu 
				
				
					Posts: 83
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Just sent you an email Andrew.  
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			 
		
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	83 RoW Cab. Send a message if you're here on Oahu.  
			 | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
			
			Join Date: Oct 2011 
				Location: Long Beach, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 381
				 
                
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Hi all! Sorry for the delay on emails this weekend. Had a big life event...got engaged to a great girl! Now competition with the P-car really begins  
		
	
		
	
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			  Evan, that's a great question. I can certainly understand the ambiguity when looking at all the options out there. Several companies have "kits", but they aren't all an equal level of completeness or technology. I'll mention some of the benefits of the Rasant kit and things to look at when comparing your options. Benefits of the Rasant Kit: The biggest difference is that many kits are not complete nor intended to be "plug-and-play". While this can be ok for some, it's important to know what you're getting yourself into. There are a lot of other components that need to be purchased along with extensive labor time. When you start adding up the pieces you need to complete these kits the Rasant kit is very affordable and comes with a much more advanced ECU! Also, the user interface of the AEM Infinity computer software is very convenient. I provide documentation with each kit and support for any questions you may have. Things to look for: -Are fuel injectors included? -Are fuel lines, fuel pressure regulator, or fuel fittings included? -Do you also need to buy spark plug leads? -Does it include a complete harness? (this requires special tools and could easily be a 15 hour job of crimping terminals, wrapping the harness, taping, etc) -How recent was the controller designed? Many of the options out there include technology from over a decade ago! -Is it simply batch fire ignition/fuel? Some kits only include a crankshaft sensor. The distributor adapter in the Rasant kit provides both cam and crankshaft signals. This allows the engine to know exactly what stroke it's on (power, exhaust, intake, compression) not only what position they're at. I'm happy to help with questions you have along the way. Hope this clarification helps you and others who are debating the kit. I have some customers out there I'm hoping will chime in with their feedback soon! Thanks, Andrew Darud Andrew@rasantproducts.com 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	1975 911S - Twin-plugged 3.5L www.rasantproducts.com  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Registered 
			
			
		
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		 
			Andrew,  CONGRATS on your engagement, thats awesome news!! 
		
	
		
	
			
			
				
					For some just looking at this kit, I know its been mentioned before, but its important to keep one of the most important features of the Infinity ECU on top of mind. The engine protection strategies! If the engine goes lean, it can automatically pull timing, limit RPM or whatever you want it to do. If you install a fuel pressure sensor and at any time start loosing fuel pressure due to a bad filter, dying fuel pump etc, the ECU will automatically start adding fuel and keep the mixture in check.(till you reach the limit of your injectors flow rate) If any of these issues occur, the ECU can be programmed to throw a warning light. It has built in knock control as well and its reasonably easy to tune once you have sensors installed. For turbo owners, with an ethanol sensor, the ecu can automatically adjust timing and boost to compensate. Also, unless its changed, traction control along with many other features is included without additional cost. Many of these features may not be included in the plug and play portion of Andrews kit... BUT they can be easily implemented in the ECU. its all there and ready to take advantage of when the time comes. Andrew, hope you dont mind the post. Let me know if you want me to edit anything. David  | 
||
| 		
			
			 | 
	
	
  |