|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Regular vs extended turbo tie-rod
Hi guys - I have a second hand rack with an unknown history that has turbo tie rods on it. I believe the tie rods came in regular and extended length sizes, and I am wondering how I check to see which one are on there. Is it via measurement or is there a stamping?
Thanks!
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Bump - surely someone knows and is willing to help a noob out?
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,751
|
I don't recall ever hearing that there was more than one length of a turbo tie rod. Perhaps you should check PET and see for yourself.
JR |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wallenstein, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,607
|
Non-turbo cars using turbo tie rods require a spacer on the steering rack side. Perhaps that is where the confusion is coming from.
Todd
__________________
1989 911 Targa |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Thanks all!
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 856
|
Pre '69 cars need extended turbo-tie rods to get the proper thread engagement. Several of the aftermarket houses make them (ER...) So if these were on your '67 912 it makes sense.
__________________
Tony 1973 914 2.2 FAT Black 1974 911 Targa Lime Green 2018 Macan GTS White 2019 Targa GTS Agate Grey |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Thanks Tony. This is going into my '67 but came from a SC. Fingers crossed that I am all set.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,751
|
Got the spacers?
JR |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
I am swapping a complete SC front suspension including the rack over so I don't think I need them, do?
__________________
1967 912 (now w/ 50% fewer random holes in it) 911 w/ 3.2 1974 914 (3.2L swap underway) 1984 928s (S4 engine and suspension), 1987 928S4 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,751
|
You need the spacers, so that would depend on whether the guy that put the tie rods on the rack actually installed them. You either have them, or you don't.
JR |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,751
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,230
|
Guys,
They large thick washers aren't spacers - they are stops which are designed to prevent over travel of the rack. This forum continually describes them as spacers but they are there for reasons of safety not for positioning the tie rod. The longer than standard track rod ends are only needed on a pre-1968 car which had shorter steering racks and different steering arms to the 1968 onward cars. The TRE off a 1990's Honda Civic is an inch longer than stock and has the correct thread pitch and taper. We pay about $10 each and have used them for the last 10 years. If you swap out the entire suspension and steering you won't need the long TRE but you should still fit the thick washer between the rack body and the tie rod. If you fit a late rack to a 1967 car then you will find that the steering is slower as the number of turns lock to lock will have increased. The early rack would be 2.7 turns lock to lock and later SC racks are around 3.3 turns. The other issue you will find is that the 'camber plate' on top f the later strut is too large for the hole in the inner wing. It will fit but the increased diameter of the bush in the camber plate will restrict the adjustment. You will typically only be able to use 4 degree of caster and negative camber adjustment would also be compromised. I would suggest that you fit the correct camber plate from the 1967 strut which will provide a greater adjustment range. Last edited by chris_seven; 01-30-2017 at 10:59 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
Here's the extended length tie rods on Elephant's site
Elephant Racing | Turbo Tie Rods | Porsche 911/912/930 Great tip from Chris about the 1990s Civic tie rod ends!
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" |
||
|
|
|
|
Somewhere in the Midwest
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the barn!
Posts: 12,499
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
Need to confirm which year(s) are applicable. The 1990s Civics have a dogleg looking tie rod end, based on a quick look see at Rock Auto. So it's a different generation that has the rod end we want. A 1987 Civic lookup shows a rod end similar to the typical 930 end
1992 Civic tie rod end is this one ![]() 1987 Civic tie rod end is this one (Lemforder!)
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" |
||
|
|
|
|
Somewhere in the Midwest
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the barn!
Posts: 12,499
|
Nice Lehmann!
|
||
|
|
|
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
No names on the net!!!!
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,230
|
It could be a much earlier Honda that morphed into the Rover 200/400 and is readily available in the UK.
I can ship a box over if it helps. |
||
|
|
|