|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Iowa
Posts: 939
|
Corner balance questions
I just finished redoing my entire suspension with a stock "restoration" package from Elephant Racing. Rebuilt the calipers, new brake lines, the whole nine yards. So the car is sitting in the garage right now waiting for corner balancing and alignment. I've been reading up on the process and have a few questions I didn't find in searching.
First, some baseline info on my setup. 1983 SC Coupe. I used all stock bushings from Elephant. The only upgrade I made was to swap out the stock Boge shocks for Bilstein HD, using the existing Boge spindles with Bilstein inserts. FRONT: I didn't touch my new (as of last year) turbo tie rod settings. I also marked the shock towers precisely so I replaced the camber plates pretty much exactly as I removed them (had the car aligned late last year-- so hoping to keep the setting) I also marked and replaced the adjusting screws for the t-bars as before. Not sure what the corner weights were, so this will be off. REAR: I measured the spring plate angle after removing the lower stop collar and recorded it. They were both very close to 34 degrees. When I reinstalled the t-bars, I set each plate at 34 degrees, which is according to the tech spec book for '83, which was the year they set US cars at "Euro" height. I also positioned the adjustable spring plates right in the middle of their adjustment range, hoping that would buy me enough movement that I won't have to reindex splines. Questions. 1. I've read a lot by Wil Ferch and Chuck Moreland, but couldn't find this so-called "in depth" discussion thread that has been referenced, but never linked to in various threads. I've love to read it. 2. Every link for Wil's calculator that I found is broken. Is it still around? 3. I know that the front adjusters lower the car when backed out (loosened), but what about the big hex eccentric adjusters out back? I don't remember which way those turn to raise or lower. Knowing that would perhaps save me an adjustment cycle when I go to corner balance. 4. Were the cars corner balanced on the assembly line? I would think with the spec for the rear plates that the worker would simply install the plates on the correct splines to get the degree spec, then torque everything. I can't imagine in a factory setting that they were pulling plates off (early non-adjustable) but I could see them using the adjustable plates since it would be much easier in a production setting. 5. I've read that one should disconnect the sway bars before corner balancing. Makes sense to me for free movement during adjustment, but couldn't the sway bar influence the weights? Thanks.
__________________
1983 SC Coupe Chiffon White 3.0 rebuilt by me 9.5:1 964 Cams. SSI's. Backdated heat. KEP sports clutch. Last edited by Jameel; 03-01-2018 at 04:29 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Here’s a link to a rear spring plate angle calculator.....
https://www.elephantracing.com/tech-topics/spring-plate-angle-calculator/ I recently updated my suspension, used the string method for f/r toe, digital angle level for camber/caster. Got the car close to desired ride height, leveled the car, aligned toe, caster, camber. Used floor tiles to level and grease in gallon baggies under the wheels to relax the suspension after jacking. Ended up purchasing a set of corner scales, got the cross weights close and rechecked all of the alignments. I have adjustable sway bars so it was easy to disconnect.
__________________
77 911s 16 981gts |
||
|
|
|
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Iowa
Posts: 939
|
Thanks for the link Knockdown. Looks like my base setting of 34 is within half a degree.
Look forward to hearing if anyone else has thoughts on my other questions. Bill, I am planning to corner balance and align. Just trying to get some things learned before I dive in on the corner balance, which I'll be doing partly on my own.
__________________
1983 SC Coupe Chiffon White 3.0 rebuilt by me 9.5:1 964 Cams. SSI's. Backdated heat. KEP sports clutch. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Troy, Mi
Posts: 1,937
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Corner balancing only makes a car handle in left turns the same it handles in right turns. I guess if you really screwed it up it could also affect wheel lockup in heavy braking too.
__________________
Matt - 84 Carrera Last edited by Driven97; 03-02-2018 at 08:54 AM.. Reason: quote formatting |
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: behind the redwood curtain, (humboldt county) california
Posts: 1,434
|
DIY or pay the pros???
Hi Jameel,
I have only cornerweighted one car. I did bars, springs, shocks, bushings and was able to borrow a set of scales from the local sports car club. If you don't have access to a set, you might want to consider having a shop finish the car, rather than put out $1000 or so on a set of scales you might only use once or twice. Do you have a really level floor?? If not, you get to play around with shimming up the scales so they are all on the same plane. If I can find it, I will post the rube Goldberg set up I cobbled together. I am going the same route as you, only adding adjustable rear drop links, SwayAway, adjustable spring plates, new MC, brake cooling, 21-28 T bars and a Quaife 2.5 "quick rack". There is an unavoidable bit of chasing one's tail, redoing the corner weight, or height because of something you did on the other end of the car/side. This can get frustrating. I think it is important to have a good overall target in mind before cranking on the heights or alignment. IMHO, getting height and alignment specs from Chuck Moreland would be a great time saver, since he has a good idea of your objectives and equipment. I am going back to "stock Euro ride height", because that is what the factory engineered for things to work out well for a sporting street car. Before moving from "stock", it is important to understand the compromises/costs you will be encountering. So: To make the suspension work the same, (camber changes, toe/roll steer ect, ect, you need the heights to be the same, side to side. This means you need to replicate your weight in the drivers seat, (concrete bags), disconnect the anti-roll bars, so they aren't loading the suspension. You need a half tank of gas and any equipment you "normally" carry, spare tire, jack, fire extinguisher, tools, spares, so you have a close to reality ability to get the weights right I have been told that you can shim the chasis mounts for the bars if they do not have adjustable drop links. Since I have a 74, the drop links were not adjustable and I got a later Carrera bar that can use heim jointed drop links, (also from Chuck). I will also drill one or two more holes in the rear bar arm to enable fine tuning with the rear bar. Are you going to use something like the "smart string" alignment system or farm out the job to a good Porsche shop? I am considering it too. Best, chris ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Iowa
Posts: 939
|
Thanks Chris and Matt for the input. I'm having a shop help with the corner balancing, but I'm playing an active part, thus the couple questions. I'll have another shop with a Hunter and 911 experience do the alignment itself.
__________________
1983 SC Coupe Chiffon White 3.0 rebuilt by me 9.5:1 964 Cams. SSI's. Backdated heat. KEP sports clutch. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Iowa
Posts: 939
|
Yeah, that's what was dancing around my head. I was trying to remember how I oriented them when I reassembled.
__________________
1983 SC Coupe Chiffon White 3.0 rebuilt by me 9.5:1 964 Cams. SSI's. Backdated heat. KEP sports clutch. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Quote:
Sherwood |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Instead of scales, I purchased a speedway weight checker. It has a piston and pressure gauge attached to a lever. You place it under the rim (topside) and lift the wheel until a shim plate under it just moves free - total weight on that wheel and no more. record each wheel/corner and proceed from there. Works perfectly.
Yes you need a guaranteed flat surface at the corner points - or you have a few mm of pre load somewhere. Bags of sand or whatever (I used cartons of wine) placed in driver position, near your weight equivalent. For street work, not worth getting too anal about it - as soon as you put a passenger in it, the balance is skewed by more than you would consider acceptable tolerance if trying to balance. For that reason, and variable driver weights, I doubt they were corner balanced at factory. Alan
__________________
83 SC, 82 930 (track) - Stock except for RarlyL8 race headers, RarlyL8 Zork, K27-7006, 22/28 T bars, 007 Fuel head, short 3&4 gears, NGK AFR, Greddy EBC (on the slippery slope), Wevo engine mounts, ERP rear camber adjust and mono balls, Tarret front monoball camber adjust, Elgin cams, 38mm ported heads, 964 IC. 380rwhp @ 0.8bar Apart from above, bone stock:-) |
||
|
|
|
|
Under the radar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
|
Also interesting is there is no mention of corner balancing in the original, up to the '71 edition, of the Workshop Manual. However it did state that the front ride heights should not vary by more than 5mm from side to side and the rear should not vary by more than 8mm from side to side.
I think Porsche has a specification for corner balance. When did it come into play?
__________________
Gordon ___________________________________ '71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed #56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage |
||
|
|
|
|
gduke2010
|
Btw, I lived in Iowa City when I bought my car and after adjusting ride height and corner balancing, I took the car to Kelly Moss Motorsports in Madison, Wisconsin for alignment. i think it cost $400. I think Bill V. is right you can get close. But, take it to a professional for fine tuning.
You're car will handle so, much better with the new bushings and shocks. I would also, consider turbo tie rods. Good luck you will really enjoy driving your car this summer. Gary |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Troy, Mi
Posts: 1,937
|
Quote:
You can stop the table from wobbling, but still have a table your pen will roll off of. That's heights, and that's what a measuring table will tell you. This is primarily cosmetic unless you're really off. The important thing for OP to know is that you can't adjust anything except cross weight with corner balance. No matter how much you raise or lower the rear, a 911 is still going to be 40:60. Likewise you can't make the left side sum lighter or heavier.
__________________
Matt - 84 Carrera |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Quote:
I fabricated a moon-shaped block of billet aluminum that fits the contour of the wheel at 12 o’clock; the other side has a drillled hole to accept the lift pin. In addition, I insert a thick piece of leather between the wheel and the aluminum block to cushion and avoid any trace of the lift assy. on the Fuchs. Speedway (and others) also sells a liquid level kit to measure and adjust the car’s footprint so they’re all the same. Sherwood |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I place a hunk of solid rubber between the lift pin and polished Fuchs.
Mine seems to fit straight on rim OK. Yes - I purchased the water level kit too. I think this amount of precision is only applicable to track work tho. the minute you throw a passenger and/or some luggage in the measurements are largely out the window as far as any precision goes - eg passenger would add another 80+kg largely to one side of car. Alan
__________________
83 SC, 82 930 (track) - Stock except for RarlyL8 race headers, RarlyL8 Zork, K27-7006, 22/28 T bars, 007 Fuel head, short 3&4 gears, NGK AFR, Greddy EBC (on the slippery slope), Wevo engine mounts, ERP rear camber adjust and mono balls, Tarret front monoball camber adjust, Elgin cams, 38mm ported heads, 964 IC. 380rwhp @ 0.8bar Apart from above, bone stock:-) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Great idea and much simpler. My mind didn’t stretch that far. Thanks for sharing.
Sherwood |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Iowa
Posts: 939
|
I did the corner balance yesterday. It went pretty well. It was off by about 60 pounds corner to corner initially. Ride heights were within about 1/4" or so of the typical 25 / 25.5 measurements. I didn't put a weight in the driver's seat because I'll often have a passenger. No autocross or tracking of this car. Just regular sports car driving on public roads so I didn't think it mattered that much. I wanted more predictable braking than handling (or so I've read) It really paid off measuring everything before I rebuilt the suspension. We only had to make one adjustment of the right rear spring plate, lowered the car down, and got these numbers.
![]() We put the scales away and drove to the alignment shop. Pretty happy with this result. One question. I think my front height may be a little low now, like 25-1/4". Should I leave it alone? I'm afraid I might have a little bump steer. If I decide to raise it up 1/4", can I turn the front adjustment screws precisely the same amount and not screw up my alignment and corner balance?
__________________
1983 SC Coupe Chiffon White 3.0 rebuilt by me 9.5:1 964 Cams. SSI's. Backdated heat. KEP sports clutch. Last edited by Jameel; 04-12-2018 at 06:38 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
As to whether to change it now at all, do you have a bump steer kit installed? There is a relatively inexpensive version that adds spacers to the steering rack, thereby bringing the tie rods closer to parallel. It should improve your bump steer issue and allow you to keep everything else in place.
__________________
'87 Carrera (3.4L) w/Turbo, full-bay IC; front bumper aux oil cooler, etc. '07 Boxter |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Do not touch it, if you raise it you will change the balance.
__________________
72 911 Although it is done at the moment, it will never be finished. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,751
|
For a street car, I doubt a change of 1/4 inch in ride height will create any noticeable change in bump steer behavior.
Any resulting change in front camber, caster and toe will likely be acceptable from a handling and tire wear standpoint. But only you can define "acceptable." Of course if you have a way to accurately and precisely measure toe changes versus ride height you can plot a curve and experiment with your own driving sensitivity. In my experience, few, if any of us amateur 911 racers bother to go through a process of optimizing bump steer. What seems more typical is the installation of rack spacers, and tie rod end solutions with known specs. For example, if you go to a service provider like JWE for an alignment, the measurement and adjustment of bump steer is not likely part of their standard service. Typically a static toe setting is all that is done. My application is racing, and I have 100's of hours of experience with alignment and CB with my 911-based race car and those of several friends. After a while you develop a feel for the sensitivities of these things.
__________________
Mike PCA Golden Gate Region Porsche Racing Club #4 BMWCCA NASA |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|