Pelican Parts Forums - Re-designed New URO Windshield Seal Review

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)

- Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)

- - Re-designed New URO Windshield Seal Review (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/998122-re-designed-new-uro-windshield-seal-review.html)

I have the same seam

I received the same URO seal last week for my 79’ SC and it has the same narley looking seam. That’s disappointing because at first glance it looks like a major weakness. Like a deformed flaw. Would love to hear from the URO guy about the bond seam.

Hi guys, we're currently investigating production run #11104 & #11819 due to reports of possible excess length/bulging, and an unattractive top seam. Will report back once Engineering completes its review.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1756161732.jpg

If anyone needs a data point I have a new in the package Lot 11819 seal. I just looked through the bag and I can see the seam. A bit of squeeze out on the back side of it. But it's hard to photograph through the bag.
David

Quote:

Originally Posted by reclino (Post 12522083)

If anyone needs a data point I have a new in the package Lot 11819 seal.

Thanks, looks like a few seals from recent lot 11819 are out in the wild, but the vast majority of them should still be in our SoCal warehouse.

Quote:

Originally Posted by UROParts (Post 12521993)

Quote:

Originally Posted by WMichelsen (Post 12521258)

I really apologize for the double post. But, this thread may also have relevant info and visibility.

Last year, I purchased the redesigned seal URO batch#11104. (see post #138)
I am finally installing my windshield and notice my seal has a big bonding seam.
My initial question was whether it should be on top or bottom.
But, I also realize I have not seen such a big blob in other pics. Is this normal for this seal?

Other semi-duplicate post:
https://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/1129917-report-new-uro-windshield-seal-7.html#post12521209

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1755988390.jpg
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1755989008.jpg

So, I am about to install a new seal and the number is the 11104. Car is still in the paint booth but will be done this week.

Just curious if this seal is okay to use or not???

Thread doesn't really state yay or nay?

Thanks!

Erik

Status update as of 9/11:

Confirmed that batches #11104 and #11819 have the unattractive seam.
Most of the seals in #11104 are too long.
We went through several seals from #11819 and found one that was the correct length. Hopefully there are more than we can send to buyers of #11104, though that doesn't solve the ugly seam issue.
We've frozen wholesale sales of batches #11104 and #11819, but there are still units on retailer shelves that will likely need to be scrapped.

So, can someone tell me if the factory seal is still fine to use?

Putting the car back together and need a seal sooner than later.

Thanks!
Erik

Quote:

Originally Posted by UROParts (Post 12530797)

Status update as of 9/11:

Confirmed that batches #11104 and #11819 have the unattractive seam.
Most of the seals in #11104 are too long.
We went through several seals from #11819 and found one that was the correct length. Hopefully there are more than we can send to buyers of #11104, though that doesn't solve the ugly seam issue.
We've frozen wholesale sales of batches #11104 and #11819, but there are still units on retailer shelves that will likely need to be scrapped.

Appreciate the post. Hopefully you can figure things out and move forward. Always nice to have less expensive options.

Erik

I posted about a year ago after I received my #11104 seal from Rock Auto. Still haven't used it, but I opened the bag and I can confirm the same gnarly seam.

So in addition to the seam, my seal is likely too long?

Mark