Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 914 & 914-6 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Mockmaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Berkeley/San Diego, CA
Posts: 78
Garage
Send a message via ICQ to Mockmaw Send a message via AIM to Mockmaw
Dropping in a 2.0L?

Hi All,

Wow, I just got my 914 and I'm already thinking about this:

I have the opportunity to acquire a healthy 2.0L engine for a very good price through a friend. It's a 75 or 76 (are there any differences between the 75 and 76?) It's complete from computer to exhaust.

How difficult would it be to place in my 72? Would there be any motor mounting issues or shift linkage problems?

How much performance increase would be expected over my current 1.7 if the 2.0 had stock fuel injection and a cat-bypass?

I would greatly appreciate any advice/assistance that could be spared =o)

-Tyler

Old 04-14-2002, 10:08 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Dade County, FL.
Posts: 1,145
Send a message via AIM to JP Noonan
best would to use a 73-74 2.0L system for the exhaust, and remove the smog equiptment. Then you will most likely get around 95 hp from the 2.0L next best would to be a set of 1.7L SS heat exchangers (the ones I've seen have the same diameter as the 2.0L) and your 1.7L exhaust, I'm not sure but the 1.7L heat exchangers might even be the same size as the 2.0L 73-74 he's. In any case I'd say using the 1.7L exhaust on the 75-76 motor would be better than the stock 75-76 exhaust EVEN IF you remove the cat the pipes are all kinds of looped around and flow badly.

The shift linkage would be the same as long as you use the 72 engine mounting bar.

The 70-72 1.7 and 73 49 state 1.7L had 80 hp. The CA 73 1.7L had 76. The 73-74 USA 2.0L had 95 and the Euro had 100. The 75-76 2.0L had 88h.p. due to the smog stuff.
__________________
93 Lightning
76 912e
Old 04-15-2002, 09:33 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Ron Meier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Crestline, CA
Posts: 937
JP is correct, but need a couple of additions.

If you use the GC 2.0L exhaust system, you will need the exhaust hanger that came on the late model car.

If you use the 1.7 system, it is necessary to use the exhaust hanger that came with it.

Ditch the late model exhaust and stay with the earlier system, unless you can find a system off the '73-'74 GA 2.0L.
__________________
"Inventor - Blue Flame 914 Seat Heater"

"Yellow Rusty Cars Are Faster"
_____________________________
'70 2.5 (I'll never finish it - Somewhere over the rainbow.....,)
'73 2.0 (Just Not The Same)
'74 2.0 (Heartless & Lungless)
Old 04-16-2002, 05:23 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Mockmaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Berkeley/San Diego, CA
Posts: 78
Garage
Send a message via ICQ to Mockmaw Send a message via AIM to Mockmaw
Interesting.. so I won't experience any backpressure problems by using the 1.7L exhaust system? The Heat Exchangers just bult right up without a problem? Nice! -o)

Also, I'm not sure if it comes with a fuel pump.. if it doesn't, can I use my old 1.7 fuel pump?
Old 04-16-2002, 10:12 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Ron Meier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Crestline, CA
Posts: 937
My manual is not at hand, but the 2.0 system and the 1.7 system is esentially the same. Your fuel pump from the 1.7 will work with the 2.0. As I remember, the 2.0 runs a little higher pressure to the fuel rails, which your 1.7 pump should be capable of.

The injectors are a different number. The lb/hr rate of the 2.0 is higher tham the 1.7, but the hookup is the same.

Hell, if it came down to it, I would even use a 1.7 FI system on a 2.0 ~
__________________
"Inventor - Blue Flame 914 Seat Heater"

"Yellow Rusty Cars Are Faster"
_____________________________
'70 2.5 (I'll never finish it - Somewhere over the rainbow.....,)
'73 2.0 (Just Not The Same)
'74 2.0 (Heartless & Lungless)
Old 04-16-2002, 12:38 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
mike95125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Grove City, OH
Posts: 1,397
I am doing roughly the same thing right now to a 73. It had a 1.7 and I got a used 2.0 from a 76. You will need to plug the air injection ports on the heads with 10mm valve adjusting screws. You can get them from any VW shop from $1-$5 each. For sure use your stock 1.7 heat exchangers. I trial fitted mine on the heads and no problem. One thing that I am not certain of though is the spacing between the heat exchangers when you bolt on your exhaust pipe. This dimention may be off slightly, dunno. I have done this conversion before with and the 1.7 Fuel pump worked just fine. The injectors for a 2.0 are different, but I heard that you could use the FI brain from the 1.7 with the 2.0 wiring. I cant be too sure, but I think that I did that last time I converted (6 years ago). Be sure to get all of the intake hoopla as it will be a pain to aquire all of the stuff piece by piece. 1.7 intake stuff will not work with the 2.0, wrong bolt pattern and such. I think that that is it. Ill write as my conflicts arrise. Good luck!!!
Old 04-16-2002, 06:03 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Administrator
 
Dave at Pelican Parts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 14,915
Garage
Send a message via AIM to Dave at Pelican Parts Send a message via Yahoo to Dave at Pelican Parts
The 1973 ECUs were the same for the 1.7s and the 2.0s. The rest seem to be somewhat different. I'd try to stick with the 2.0 parts if at all possible, to avoid oddd interactions. Check Brad Anders' page for some great info on what goes on inside the MPS and the ECU. http://members.rennlist.com/pbanders

The exhaust port spacing should be the same between the 1.7 and 2.0 heads. If I recall correctly, you use the exhaust gaskets for the 2.0 rather than the 1.7 . Use the muffler gaskets that go with your muffler (i.e., the 1.7 ones).

Myself, I'd use all of the 2.0 stuff except the exhaust.

--DD

__________________
Pelican Parts 914 Tech Support

A few pics of my car: http://www.pelicanparts.com/gallery/Dave_Darling
Old 04-17-2002, 08:37 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:54 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.