|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Cam Choice
So my clutch started slipping, and I figure while the engine is out this would be a good time to toss a cam in there. A 964 cam is probably the correct and easy answer, but this car is about the fun experience for me and ive always wanted the idle of a big cam. It's currently running 3.4 p/c with 7.5:1, 3.2 carrera manifold, Full bay turbokraft intercooler Sequential EFI etc. Will probably set it up for flex fuel while its apart as well. Unfortunately I am still on the stock heads, and I cant spend the money to do the top end properly right now, so thats staying. Gt2 evo cams? I should probably just call turbokraft but I figured maybe somebody here has another interesting idea.
__________________
'86 930 Guards Red - EFI MS3Pro, 80lb inj, 3.4, GT35R, Tial 46, Bosch 044, B&B Headers, 3.2 carrera manifold, Turbokraft Full bay IC CIS sucks balls |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I'll vote for the 964 cams. With a set up like you have, which is very similar to what I have, it revs so fast to redline, why make that last 1,000 rpm come any faster?
__________________
2014 Cayman S (track rat w/GT4 suspension) 1979 930 (475 rwhp at 0.95 bar) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,032
|
LMK if you decide on 964 cams. I have a nice pair that’s had the pwr steering lobe ground.
I was going to use them in my 930 but decided on SC cams.
__________________
81 Pacific Blue 930 Euro coupe slicktop on a strict diet, Rarlyl8 headers, Blowzilla turbo, Tial waste gate, Full bay I/C, Home made center out exhaust, Leask WUR, MSD 6AL, PLX wideband Wevo shifter, LSD. Next up, Cams, Heads and port work |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Yeah a 964 cam would make sense, but wont give me the idle I'm looking for.
__________________
'86 930 Guards Red - EFI MS3Pro, 80lb inj, 3.4, GT35R, Tial 46, Bosch 044, B&B Headers, 3.2 carrera manifold, Turbokraft Full bay IC CIS sucks balls |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,647
|
Depending on your pistons, the GT2evo cams might need eyebrows cut in the pistons for valve clearance. You need to check the exhaust side AND the intake side. The last one I put evo cams in was awfully close on the intakes, too. 0.025" is cutting it really close on the intakes and leaves no room for error.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 587
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
'86 930 Guards Red - EFI MS3Pro, 80lb inj, 3.4, GT35R, Tial 46, Bosch 044, B&B Headers, 3.2 carrera manifold, Turbokraft Full bay IC CIS sucks balls |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,032
|
That beast sounds downright mean
__________________
81 Pacific Blue 930 Euro coupe slicktop on a strict diet, Rarlyl8 headers, Blowzilla turbo, Tial waste gate, Full bay I/C, Home made center out exhaust, Leask WUR, MSD 6AL, PLX wideband Wevo shifter, LSD. Next up, Cams, Heads and port work |
||
|
|
|
|
Crotchety Old Bastard
|
Those are GT2 cams with my exhaust. Two obstacles with those, one you have to relief cut the pistons and the other is it throws the torque curve to the right, harder for the tires to bust loose when the turbo hits.
__________________
RarlyL8 Motorsports / M&K Exhaust - 911/930 Exhaust Systems, Turbos, TiAL, CIS Mods/Rebuilds '78 911SC Widebody, 930 engine, 915 Tranny, K27, SC Cams, RL8 Headers & GT3 Muffler. 350whp @ 0.75bar Brian B. (256)536-9977 Service@MKExhaust Brian@RarlyL8 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 587
|
actually they are ,TK MODIFIED 965-S GRIND CAMSHAFTS -- better street & EFI use, more torque than 964 or SC .
strong bottom end - better than stock off boost, no stall , no sputter , no flat spots I have a RUF K-29 turbo and it still has the same boost threshold as a K-27. it does hit very hard but my wife can drive it to get groceries. Still CIS with a RarlyL8 adjustable WUR, modded Fuel head, headers and muffler. I've posted these before need to make new ones , the sound gets so many complements. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URADTyXSo5I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhrHoGAKG2M |
||
|
|
|
|
Crotchety Old Bastard
|
Sorry about that, I had your cams listed as GT2 in my notes, totally different. Love the loping sound!
__________________
RarlyL8 Motorsports / M&K Exhaust - 911/930 Exhaust Systems, Turbos, TiAL, CIS Mods/Rebuilds '78 911SC Widebody, 930 engine, 915 Tranny, K27, SC Cams, RL8 Headers & GT3 Muffler. 350whp @ 0.75bar Brian B. (256)536-9977 Service@MKExhaust Brian@RarlyL8 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 192
|
Well when I redo my engine I know what I'm going with now. I was considering GT2's but your car sounds awesome.
I'm still on the fence about going EFI but want to keep the CIS since it's a system I kind of know (the issues I'm currently having with it non withstanding lol). EFI would be a new learning curve but that's where the power is at. "Horsepower is expensive, how fast do you want to go" I figure 475-500 whp should be enough if I go EFI. A flat fan conversion sure does look sexy as well but costs more than what I'll probably spend on the rebuild.
__________________
3.4,K27,Andial IC,Sc cams,Ported heads,Electromotive Ign,Twin plug,Leask Wur,RarlyL8 zork,GHL headers,Simplified CIS,Ported fuel head,Fikse wheels,Etc.Go hard or go home |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Curious, how much do you gain with all of the great mods without having ported heads? Would appreciate seeing dyno sheet.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/pdqcarrera |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 587
|
@pdqcarrera
I have seriously welded and ported heads and intake http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-930-turbo-super-charging-forum/767012-forced-deal.html I was @ 450 whp , I have since installed a modded fuel head for more fuel.Car is tuned but not dyno. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58
|
I have gt2 cams efi. It doesnt have much of a lumpy idle, no where near close to the above video. Maybe my tuner just made it smooth though.
I never did get a definite answer as far as which one is better for street/mid range between 964 and gt2 cams. Based on my past research, it seems to be split. Many say 964 is for midrange while others say gt2 is for midrange and then you got people saying gt2 is only for 700hp track cars! Even the cam grinders have conflicting opinions. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
However, I was asking the original poster who noted "Unfortunately I am still on the stock heads". My heads were ported with expectation to take full advantage of 964 cam. Still CIS though. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,862
|
Hi all,
The cams we sold to Black_Hat are as radical as we go on a CIS car. They *do* require small valve pockets -- he sent us the pistons and we machined small valve reliefs in them. Fun burble at idle, great midrange torque, relentless pull to redline. They do *not* like a restrictive engine. These work best on engines with ported heads, free-flowing turbos and mufflers, good intercoolers.
__________________
Chris Carroll TurboKraft, Inc. Tel. 480.969.0911 email: info@turbokraft.com http://www.facebook.com/TurboKraft - http://www.instagram.com/TurboKraft |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
At this point im leaning towards just throwing some 964 cams at it until I do the full top end. Just seems silly to pull the engine for the clutch and not throw something on the engine at the same time.
__________________
'86 930 Guards Red - EFI MS3Pro, 80lb inj, 3.4, GT35R, Tial 46, Bosch 044, B&B Headers, 3.2 carrera manifold, Turbokraft Full bay IC CIS sucks balls |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,862
|
Quote:
964 is a good profile when you have more base CR. But they will never have a lumpy idle, if that's what you want.
__________________
Chris Carroll TurboKraft, Inc. Tel. 480.969.0911 email: info@turbokraft.com http://www.facebook.com/TurboKraft - http://www.instagram.com/TurboKraft |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Are those cams on your site?
|
||
|
|
|