![]() |
Quote:
|
As the virus is becoming more contagious, its becoming less deadly.
A smarter course of action might be to rely more on natural immunity then these vaccines. Let's see how this idea ages in the next year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
As of today, only 3 states account for 40% of new cases.. if those numbers don't wake the mind of the unvaccinated, there really is no hope.
|
Quote:
Expect a new, "deadlier" variant periodically to excuse governmental overreach until all private property is "shared" with others that did not work as smart and hard as you did to earn it (note the unconstitutional eviction moratorium). All stepping stones on the road to less personal freedom/marxism...unless citizens step up to cry foul/stop it. |
Quote:
|
Hopefully that new requirement for foreign nationals to be vaccinated in order to enter, will be put into effect.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1628197967.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1628198434.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1628198434.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1628198434.jpg |
Darwin
Don't protect yourself or others - Darwin will see to it.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Interesting, read it until the very end:
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/29/87-percent-covid-deaths-are-vaccinated-people/ |
Quote:
Those who really can't are likely to be offered work from home of some sort and if appropriate and available. Sandbaggers are likely to be seeking employment. What are you going to do if your place brings a mandate? |
Quote:
In a way the virus is smart, in a much more profound way you are really stupid. |
Quote:
Any chance that phenomenon has something to do with millions of vaccinated people? |
Quote:
You’re free to not get vaccinated and roll the dice. |
This may have been said previously, but if one refuses to get vaccinated, then perhaps insurance companies should deny all payment for any directly related medical treatments expenses.
That probably won't work because IMHO people who refuse the vaccination believe they won't get sick from it and are willing to "roll the dice". Perhaps insurance companies can add a surcharge to the insurance premiums of the unvaccinated, a premium that cannot be legally be paid by one's employer or government-sponsored health care plan (e.g. Medicare) so it would have to come directly out of the individuals pocket. They are, after all, increasing their risk factors and insurance companies charge more to smokers, right? I also wonder if it is possible that vaccinated immunocompromised people (say those with MS, RA, lung cancer survivor, etc.) have grounds for a lawsuit against no-mask state laws and in a broader sense the voluntarily unvaccinated. |
The libs would like to castrate you for dodging the needle. Bottom line, personal choice...No way you can justify forcing people. Biden’s got this... Lol
Tim |
https://archive.is/FdoHV
Pfizer CEO's Israel visit canceled because he is not fully vaccinated Bourla said in December that he has not yet received the vaccine yet because he does not want to "cut in line." By JERUSALEM POST STAFF MARCH 7, 2021 00:39 |
Quote:
https://www.logically.ai/articles/actors-behind-uk-misinformation-site-the-daily-expose |
Quote:
Quote:
But, isn't that exactly the opposite of the premise of this thread...that the freaky left wants government to "punish" those who do not get vaccinated (with the vaccine that many told us was dangerous when the Trump Administration was pushing it through development/approval)? I was probably one of the first vaccinated here...but I certainly do not want government to make others take it against their will. As noted, government overreach is always the answer for some...but never really the right answer. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
COVID is dangerous - this is true but the #s are a huge steaming pile of manure. Here is one example:
https://www.foxnews.com/health/california-county-cuts-covid-death-toll Quote:
|
Quote:
I agree with you. Make your choice and roll the dice. |
Quote:
|
I question the legitimacy of the FDA making the Pfizer vaccine approved. Supposedly, it will be approved a month from today. That sounds a wee bit fishy to me.
|
Pfizer applied for full approval on or about May 7th. Priority revew is "within 6 months ". The time frame fits within their standards. Personally, I would rather wait a few more months. Early approval will only add to the rushed and untested complaints. I doubt if it gives much confidence to those that are already sceptical. It should give companies more confidence in applying employee or customer requirements.
https://www.fda.gov/patients/fast-track-breakthrough-therapy-accelerated-approval-priority-review/priority-review Prior to approval, each drug marketed in the United States must go through a detailed FDA review process. In 1992, under the Prescription Drug User Act (PDUFA), FDA agreed to specific goals for improving the drug review time and created a two-tiered system of review times – Standard Review and Priority Review. A Priority Review designation means FDA’s goal is to take action on an application within 6 months (compared to 10 months under standard review). |
I have questioned myself, and the data. I don't think the later outweighs the prior.
I had covid, pretty bad stuff. My wife had covid as well, and she got sick after both shots. Why the hell would I want to go through that, again? Is she better off than I am? How does anyone know? I "rolled" the dice once, we all did, or better yet, the Chinese did for us all. The numbers don't substantiate the immediacy for me to be vaccinated. Now when you vaccinated people get covid, I should have the right to pull your pants down and kick you squarely in the ass. You are, after all, allowing a virus to enter your body via an injection. Has anyone made a direct correlation to the vaccine and the spread? Why not? Sure seems plausible to me. I really can not wait to kick you in the ass for damning me. See you then, dumbass. |
I just think it’s odd that they say it’s going to be approved a month from now and give the specific day. Normally, I would expect they would simply wait until it’s approved, then announce it on whatever day that turned out to be.
|
I haven't seen where they mentioned a specific day. I have heard early next month or by Labor Day.
They have been answering questions when asked. I guess they could answer "no comment". You know they have all hands on deck for the approval process. |
Well at least there are no political pressures on any of this. /sarc
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’ve yet to hear that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why do you fail to see that breakthrough cases were to be expected? Look at the percentages of folks who are vaccinated ending up in the hospital let alone croaking? |
Quote:
You have proof of that? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website