|
|
|
|
|
|
1.367m later
|
Quote:
(In most cases) An officer has already determined/decided if he has cause to search your vehicle before he even makes contact with you. When he asks you if you will consent to a search he is simply stacking the deck (probable cause) in his favor by adding your reluctance to be searched the situation.
__________________
non velox ad propitiare, verisimile non oblivisci If it's not The Original Automotive Innovations and Restoration, then it's just hot AIR. Last edited by KevinP73; 06-02-2009 at 04:01 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: I be home in CA
Posts: 7,718
|
Quote:
How long ago was this? Did he say why he pulled you over? From what I understand all they can do is tow you and get a warrant. But that again, lower municipal courts are the worst and an appeal takes serious cash.
__________________
Dan |
||
|
|
|
|
Control Group
|
That is why you tell them, "No, I do not consent to your searching my vehicle. I need to be somewhere by XX:XX, why did you pull me over officer?"
__________________
She was the kindest person I ever met |
||
|
|
|
|
1.367m later
|
This was back in '83 or '84 in Burbank. The reason he gave for stopping me was because I had a cracked windshield and he saw me make a right turn without using my turn signal. He felt that I was trying to flee when I made the turn w/o my signal.
__________________
non velox ad propitiare, verisimile non oblivisci If it's not The Original Automotive Innovations and Restoration, then it's just hot AIR. |
||
|
|
|