|
|
|
|
|
|
Cars & Coffee Killer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: State of Failure
Posts: 32,246
|
Just use MQ Series....
__________________
Some Porsches long ago...then a wankle... 5 liters of VVT fury now -Chris "There is freedom in risk, just as there is oppression in security." |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Langley,B.C.
Posts: 12,113
|
Quote:
Except we built a 3.8 with all the goodies including cams.The V8 builds create some pretty large drive shaft angles as the gearbox is moved rearward by the additional length of motor plus the adapter plate. The Audi V8 bolts right up so the angles are better...
__________________
Turn3 Autosport- Full Service and Race Prep www.turn3autosport.com 997 S 4.0, Cayman S 3.8, Cayenne Turbo, Macan Turbo, 69 911, Mini R53 JCW , RADICAL SR3 Last edited by Jeff Alton; 12-08-2016 at 05:23 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,765
|
Quote:
I suspect with respect to driveability, it's probably as good or better than a stock Cayman. I'm sure that motor makes more torque through the entire rpm range than a stock Cayman or Cayman S motor which means that you could idle away from every stop if you wanted and idle around at 1000-2000 rpm all day long. So from that point of view, it would be an easier DD. If you could get something that was a lower profile motor that fit in the engine compartment without the major mods, and leave the car otherwise fairly stock (assuming the brakes and suspension are up to handling the new power/speed), then it would make a spectacular daily driver.
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa SOLD 2004 - gone but not forgotten
|
||
|
|
|
|
Did you get the memo?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 33,007
|
Because the motor swap is the easy part. The hard part is integrating the Porsche systems with a Ford motor. That is what separates a great engine swap from a hack job.
__________________
‘07 Mazda RX8 Past: 911T, 911SC, Carrera, 951s, 955, 996s, 987s, 986s, 997s, BMW 5x, C36, C63, XJR, S8, Maserati Coupe, GT500, etc |
||
|
|
|
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,765
|
Yeah, but you're OLD.
You'd rather be driving one of these from the gold old days. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa SOLD 2004 - gone but not forgotten
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,612
|
My stock '11 says 320 HP. I have no idea, mind you, if we are comparing apples to apples (i.e. rwhp or bhp). All I know is that the stock "S" needs PASM in my opinion because whatever it's got, it will spin the wheels half way down my block already. I think that 30% more power might be a bit scary in the rain with no PASM.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,765
|
Quote:
PSM keeps you from spinning the tires and spinning out in a curve if you screw up. IIRC (Porsche Stability Management) PASM means your shocks can get stiff or soft depending upon if you are on a bumpy road or driving aggressively or try to change lanes to avoid something in the road. IIRC (Porsche Active Suspension Management) And yes, I have PSM on in my car 99% of the time, and my '08 only has 303hp (first boxster to break the 300hp mark).
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa SOLD 2004 - gone but not forgotten
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,612
|
^ Yes, I am bad at acronyms. The button to the left of the "Sport" one, I like to turn off. Way too stiff for me. The button that shows a curvy road, I leave on.
When I first got it, I buried the throttle in the rain, driving perfectly straight. I could feel the car's stability management oscillate to keep the car moving in a straight line. Eerie feeling. I do not like it much in the dry though, I have to admit. It moves the apex too abruptly and too far to the inside in a 4 wheel drift. Anyway, the Mustang motor Cayman looks fun. Not ready for market yet, but fun still. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,790
|
Quote:
LOL! Yep, I'm old...may you keep breathing long enough to reach the same status. I will confess to having reached the age point where I can understand the appeal of a luxobarge. Driving a bumper to bumper stop and go city arterial finds me thinking that an automatic might be better than the Mustang's 5 speed. IF there is a next new car for me, I might give Lexus a test drive... I can understand the fun aspect of the coyote swap into a Cayman...but really no urge to own one.
__________________
"Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have a radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. '73) (I, Paul D. have loved this quote since 1973. It will remain as long as I post here.) |
||
|
|
|