|
|
|
|
|
|
just me
|
3.2 intake
everybody seems to go on about exhaust and muffler for a 3.2 motronic engine.
how good are things on the intake side? I know the "cold air" filters are not better, and MAF sensors are expensive for the amount of power they deliver over stock. what are the possiblities for improving the stock intake?
__________________
1975 911s, 3.2l and 915 transmission front oil cooler RUF replica bumper ducktail and SC rear flares SW chip ssi's m&k 2 in 1 out sc front calipers PF 97 pads fuchs 16 x 7 and 8 225/ 245 toyo ra-1s 22/29 torsion bars 25mm Charlie Bars Neatrix bushings lowered and corner balanced DAS bolt in roll bar kirkey seat 5 point harnesses. http://www.hairydoggrrrage.com/ |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nash County, NC.
Posts: 8,556
|
Years ago there was a lot of porting and polishing done on them.
What would be done is cutting each side in half, right through the word PORSCHE, then port, polish and weld back together. I havent seen this done in 15 years but I was out of the loop for several Bruce |
||
|
|
|
|
UFLYICU
|
The stock intake is as good as it gets. Minimal gains can be had by smoothing the manifold innards, and the MAF would flow better than the barn door, but there's not much there without changing the whole shootin match.
__________________
_______________________ Racer Rix Spec911 #5 prc-racing.com |
||
|
|
|
|
just me
|
interesting. was there any marked advantage from it? or is the intake pretty well done from the factory?
__________________
1975 911s, 3.2l and 915 transmission front oil cooler RUF replica bumper ducktail and SC rear flares SW chip ssi's m&k 2 in 1 out sc front calipers PF 97 pads fuchs 16 x 7 and 8 225/ 245 toyo ra-1s 22/29 torsion bars 25mm Charlie Bars Neatrix bushings lowered and corner balanced DAS bolt in roll bar kirkey seat 5 point harnesses. http://www.hairydoggrrrage.com/ |
||
|
|
|
|
UFLYICU
|
Factory did the best, right down to the airbox cover. Most will make less horsepower with a modified (opend) cover. The choke point on these motors is on the bottom. That's why so many go on and on about exhaust/mufflers/headers, etc.
__________________
_______________________ Racer Rix Spec911 #5 prc-racing.com |
||
|
|
|
|
UFLYICU
|
There are gains in the fuel maps, and timing, and those are obvious first choices when optimizing these motors. The best changes come with a comprehensive approach to the chip maps and exhaust setup.
__________________
_______________________ Racer Rix Spec911 #5 prc-racing.com |
||
|
|
|
|
|
just me
|
so the next step is the cylinder heads and cams. are there gains there on a stock displacement 3.2?
__________________
1975 911s, 3.2l and 915 transmission front oil cooler RUF replica bumper ducktail and SC rear flares SW chip ssi's m&k 2 in 1 out sc front calipers PF 97 pads fuchs 16 x 7 and 8 225/ 245 toyo ra-1s 22/29 torsion bars 25mm Charlie Bars Neatrix bushings lowered and corner balanced DAS bolt in roll bar kirkey seat 5 point harnesses. http://www.hairydoggrrrage.com/ |
||
|
|
|
|
MBruns for President
|
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
|
|
|
|
just me
|
I've read a lot there and have a SW chip. just curious to hear what folks have done on the intake side
__________________
1975 911s, 3.2l and 915 transmission front oil cooler RUF replica bumper ducktail and SC rear flares SW chip ssi's m&k 2 in 1 out sc front calipers PF 97 pads fuchs 16 x 7 and 8 225/ 245 toyo ra-1s 22/29 torsion bars 25mm Charlie Bars Neatrix bushings lowered and corner balanced DAS bolt in roll bar kirkey seat 5 point harnesses. http://www.hairydoggrrrage.com/ |
||
|
|
|
|
MBruns for President
|
Usually you extrude hone the intake to even up the flow - minimal increase - especially if you are optimizing. As others have said - Porsche did the top right. Any gains that don't cost cubic dollars are found in the chip and the exhaust.
On the cam front - depends on your delivery More aggressive and you run out of room with the motronic - so probably something similar to 993 SS cams and you can still maintain and idle. Get more aggressive and you need to switch to PMO's or ITB's. Then of course you need to worry about piston to valve contact so switch out the pistons and cylinders too.
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
|
|
|
|
just me
|
it is what I figured. maybe something to look at down the road. juust rebuilt the engine so I have plenty of enjoyment before I need to upgrade anything!
__________________
1975 911s, 3.2l and 915 transmission front oil cooler RUF replica bumper ducktail and SC rear flares SW chip ssi's m&k 2 in 1 out sc front calipers PF 97 pads fuchs 16 x 7 and 8 225/ 245 toyo ra-1s 22/29 torsion bars 25mm Charlie Bars Neatrix bushings lowered and corner balanced DAS bolt in roll bar kirkey seat 5 point harnesses. http://www.hairydoggrrrage.com/ |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,612
|
Porsche designed several intakes, including the 3.2, to actually compress air at higher rpm. That means you get more air going into the cylinders than the actual displacement. As for modifying the intake? Move along, nuthin to see here folks.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 681
|
What about this, I am thinking of buying one:
911 and Porsche World Magazine Visit AmD. http://www.gekkatec.com/Products.html Last edited by whiterabbit; 02-04-2010 at 08:38 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
UFLYICU
|
If you plan to spin the motor beyond the factory stock limiter, you should replace the rod bolts with ARP racing bolts. The Carreras were reduced to 9mm bolts which have seen issues when revved too high.
__________________
_______________________ Racer Rix Spec911 #5 prc-racing.com |
||
|
|
|
|
a.k.a. G-man
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,614
|
Quote:
Throttle response will improve though. I have the LB1 kit from FVD, a similar system.
__________________
Сидеть, ложь, Переворачиваться |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
I need a new AFM anyway so will give this a go for the $500 difference. No matter what I do the present one is reading too lean...... I already have two dyno runs, one stock and one with the SW chip so will post the diference once it gets a little warmer and I can purchase and install this. So are you happy with the FVD system? Last edited by whiterabbit; 02-07-2010 at 07:48 AM.. |
||
|
|
|